It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NeverSleepingEyes
your title claims "proof"
I'm sorry, there's no proof whatsoever
I would appreciate if people would be more careful when using words like "evidence" or "proof".
what's wrong with "possible"?
Originally posted by xFiDgetx
Soooo.... It was, what, one alien? Did he come down here in a one way little pod with nothing but his trusty pocket gene modifier?
You want to talk about infrastructure, sheesh.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
how does this prove Anunnaki built this? Does it say built by Anunnaki? How do you jump strait to anunnaki when there is an old city found? Most likely it 99.9% it was built by humans.
Originally posted by Viking9019
I believe that this is nothing but speculation on how it got there.
Originally posted by On the level
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
Originally posted by Dannijca
Originally posted by NeverSleepingEyes
your title claims "proof"
I'm sorry, there's no proof whatsoever
I would appreciate if people would be more careful when using words like "evidence" or "proof".
what's wrong with "possible"?
Show me a proof that egiptians have made the piramides....
The exact location of the calendar is listed on www.makomati.com. The first calculations of the age of the calendar were made based on the rise of Orion, a constellation known for its three bright stars forming the "belt" of the mythical hunter. The Earth wobbles on its axis and so the stars and constellations change their angle of presentation in the night sky on a cyclical basis. This rotation, called the precession completes a cycle about every 26,000 years. By determining when the three stars of Orion's belt were positioned flat (horizontal) against the horizon, we can estimate the time when the three stones in the calendar were in alignment with these conspicuous stars. The first rough calculation was at least 25,000 years ago. But new and more precise measurements kept increasing the age. The next calculation was presented by a master archaeoastronomer who wishes to remain anonymous for fear of ridicule by the academic fraternity. His calculation was also based on the rise of Orion and suggested an age of at least 75,000 years. The most recent and most acurate calculation, done in June 2009, suggests an age of at least 160,000 years, based on the rise of Orion - flat on the horizon - but also on the erosion of dolerite stones found at the site. Some pieces of the marker stones had been broken off and sat on the ground, exposed to natural erosion. When the pieces were put back together about 3 cm of stone had already been worn away. These calculation helped assess the age of the site by calculating the erosion rate of the dolerite.
Originally posted by gekados
The following discovery is of immense importance in our quest to find the TRUE human history.
Something amazing has been discovered in an area of South Africa.
Part of a larger community that is about 10,000 square miles and appears to have been constructed - are you ready - from 160,000 to 200,000 BCE!
Read everything here: HumansAreFree.com...
Originally posted by NeverSleepingEyes
Originally posted by Dannijca
Originally posted by NeverSleepingEyes
your title claims "proof"
I'm sorry, there's no proof whatsoever
I would appreciate if people would be more careful when using words like "evidence" or "proof".
what's wrong with "possible"?
Show me a proof that egiptians have made the piramides....
No, I will not enter your discursive trick.
As I am not claiming a thing, I don't have to "proof".
Those who claim should proof (and should understand what "proof" means")
Originally posted by Dannijca
Originally posted by NeverSleepingEyes
Originally posted by Dannijca
Originally posted by NeverSleepingEyes
your title claims "proof"
I'm sorry, there's no proof whatsoever
I would appreciate if people would be more careful when using words like "evidence" or "proof".
what's wrong with "possible"?
Show me a proof that egiptians have made the piramides....
No, I will not enter your discursive trick.
As I am not claiming a thing, I don't have to "proof".
Those who claim should proof (and should understand what "proof" means")
So you are asking for "proofs" and you dont have proof for anything? lol