It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Section31
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
reply to post by Section31
yeah! screw those people! They should be out on their butts in the cold!
Entitlement for the delinquent!
What the hell is wrong with our president!
Article 25.
(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.
He is dumber than George Bush Jr.!
Do you know how to get a crap load of Democrats to vote Republican? You take their hardworking cash, and then you give it to someone who thinks they are entitled to free stuff.
Originally posted by Section31
I have a solution.
Once we discover the means for efficient space travel, we re-enact what Christopher Columbus did in the past. As the 50% who pay taxes leave the 50% who don't behind, we setup new military defenses on a new home world. When those 50% slackers finally get off their duff to find us, we blow them out of the sky before they touchdown.
edit on 6/4/2011 by Section31 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
So you tell me...where did the repeal of Glass-Steagle begin?
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Wrong question. Allow me to elucidate you.
Article 25.
(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
- Article XXV, clause 1 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The United States voted as one of the 48 nations in favor of the Declaration. The Declaration is a foundational document of the United Nations, of which the United States is a founding member. It provides definition to the terms "fundamental freedoms" and "human rights" used in the United nations Charter; this charter is legally binding to all member states, including, of course, the United States of America.
Originally posted by dawnstar
The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act........hmmm.....all republican names.....repealed the Glass–Steagall Act . yes, president clinton signed it, but it was mostly a republican piece that the democrats didn't jump on board of until there were a few concessions made to it....
so, it seems to me, that if you chose to blame the dems for this piece of ligislation, then well...you'd also have to blame the republicans, since the put twice as much time and energy into making it a reality.....
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Section31
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
The United States voted as one of the 48 nations in favor of the Declaration. The Declaration is a foundational document of the United Nations, of which the United States is a founding member.
I don't care about the United Nations. I care about the United States.
Originally posted by macman
All right.
Stop making payments on my home and the Fed Govt will help make payments.
Gotta love it.
What a wonderful time this it.
Originally posted by LeoTolstoy
Originally posted by macman
All right.
Stop making payments on my home and the Fed Govt will help make payments.
Gotta love it.
What a wonderful time this it.
I think you've missed the point. This programme is designed to help people who are unable or facing difficulty making mortgage payments, not those unwilling to.
I think you've missed the point. This programme is designed to help people who are unable or facing difficulty making mortgage payments, not those unwilling to.
Originally posted by Bordon81
reply to post by LeoTolstoy
I think you've missed the point. This programme is designed to help people who are unable or facing difficulty making mortgage payments, not those unwilling to.
So do they have to show need by filing a chapter 13 or something? Otherwise how will the banks know the homeowners are truly in need?
Normally when a delinquent homeowner files chapter 13 the courts investigate the homeowners resources and restructure their debt into more affordable payments that are then paid through a trusty.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
what i shame i dont do requests.
the fantasy is welfare and i couldnt live with myself knowing that the only reason that check comes is the fact that is stolen from someone else just trying to make it destroying other people because some idiots morality trumps property rights in this country.
Originally posted by Kali74
Its far more draining on taxpayers to shelter and feed homeless than it is to give a lifeline and help someone keep their home while they look for new employment. The middle class have footed the bill and carried this country for a long time, and got the biggest shaft thanks to GW Bush. Obama didn't create this mess, you can delude yourselves all you want. You can't cry how americans aren't being bailed out and then when they are cry about a welfare state. You're like children with too many toys.