It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RealAmericanPatriot
reply to post by WordPlayJAy
Sharia law DOES authorize it by empowering the "mullahs" that authorize it.
Islam...coming soon...to a state near you...
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
Originally posted by Stewie
reply to post by nightbringr
By, comparison, the Muslim people are civilized compared to Americans...and I am American.
Look closer to home before you demonize an entire culture.
That is my point.
While I agree that we have our own atrocities here, and I will be the first one to shout my defiance at the bastards that spit on our rights every day, I have to take a leaf from the old redneck book and say, "if you don't like America, you can geet owwt!" Seriously dude, you think that the Arab nations are more civilized than us? Take a !@#$ing vacation there some time then, and you just might appreciate what little freedoms we still have in this country. You will certainly have a bit more respect for our culture when you see the pathetic lives those people have brought upon themselves based on a ridiculous religion.edit on 30-5-2011 by Q:1984A:1776 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wcitizen
Originally posted by nightbringr
Originally posted by Stewie
Ah yes...
and in the U.S. we just pump 50 rounds into somebody because someone suspects that the "house" is a drug house.
Innocent father dead, leaves behind a six year old son and a pregnant wife.
Repeat that scenario a few hundred times for the cases that don't get reported because the victim is a nobody.
What is your point?
That was off-topic and has nothing to do with the discussion at hand.
I think this is awful and is simply another shining example on why Sharia law should be stopped by any means possible from spreading its diseased tentacles into the West.
By the same token the US should be stopped by any means possible from spreading its diseased tentacles of murderous, demonic alleged democracy and mass murder and financial terrorism across the world.
I don't agree with stoning, absolutely not. But the self-righteousness tone of your comments ignores the immense number of atrocities the US government is perpetating on three-quarters of the world. Obama and Bush are self-proclaimed Christians..... Christianity's history of mass murder remains unsurpassed.
Originally posted by nightbringr
[
My comments in no way, shape or form ignore the evil the West has caused. Do you think i am unaware of the wrongs perpetrated over here? If so, why do think im unaware? I frequently post on outrages caused or perpetrated here in the West.
Are you simply so focused on the wrongs on this side of the ocean you are unwilling or able to see that evil happens elsewhere? Simply because bad things happen here, i am supposed to ignore when somthing awful happens to a poor, young girl in the East? You do this poor girl a great injustice by saying to us "Dont worry about her! There are bad things here, too!". You minimize the plight of all people hurt, both in the East, AND the West.
Read though your last 4 posts. The OP's topic is specific. It is about how a girl was murdered, and you insist time and time again on pointing the finger at the West, when this simply did not happen here. Well newsflash; if this happened here, i would be talking about it as well, demanding the perpetrator be penalized to the full extent of the law.
Your message is also very selfish. You claim that while there are issues at home here in the West, we should focus clearly on those, and nothing else it would seem. Well im not that selfish. I worry about the plight off ALL people, no matter how near or far.
You are off topic, and clearly have an anti-Western agenda. Please try and stay on topic. No one here is denying the West is responsible for horrible things, it simply isnt the topic matter.edit on 3-6-2011 by nightbringr because: (no reason given)
I think this is awful and is simply another shining example on why Sharia law should be stopped by any means possible from spreading its diseased tentacles into the West.
Originally posted by wcitizen
Originally posted by nightbringr
[
My comments in no way, shape or form ignore the evil the West has caused. Do you think i am unaware of the wrongs perpetrated over here? If so, why do think im unaware? I frequently post on outrages caused or perpetrated here in the West.
Are you simply so focused on the wrongs on this side of the ocean you are unwilling or able to see that evil happens elsewhere? Simply because bad things happen here, i am supposed to ignore when somthing awful happens to a poor, young girl in the East? You do this poor girl a great injustice by saying to us "Dont worry about her! There are bad things here, too!". You minimize the plight of all people hurt, both in the East, AND the West.
Read though your last 4 posts. The OP's topic is specific. It is about how a girl was murdered, and you insist time and time again on pointing the finger at the West, when this simply did not happen here. Well newsflash; if this happened here, i would be talking about it as well, demanding the perpetrator be penalized to the full extent of the law.
Your message is also very selfish. You claim that while there are issues at home here in the West, we should focus clearly on those, and nothing else it would seem. Well im not that selfish. I worry about the plight off ALL people, no matter how near or far.
You are off topic, and clearly have an anti-Western agenda. Please try and stay on topic. No one here is denying the West is responsible for horrible things, it simply isnt the topic matter.edit on 3-6-2011 by nightbringr because: (no reason given)
I see you are someone who is very quick to throw judgements around.
What I object to is people in the west taking the moral high ground. Why is that an anti-Western agenda? Or does this conclusion of yours betray your own agenda...west is best?
To be clear, I don't have an anti-western agenda, nor do I have an anti-muslim agenda, etc. I abhor violence in all its forms.
I do have an agenda about us westeners taking the moral high ground on these issues.
Please show me exactly where I said we should only focus on our western problems and not on others? You can't because I didn't say that, nor did I imply that.
You say that to do so would be selfish. IMO it's selfish focus on the faults of other cultures and portray them as worse than our own, when our own countries have and are still causing massive, humungous amounts of terrible suffering all over the world.
My post is not off topic. Or if it is, yours must be too. Here's the sentence which you posted which I was replying to:
I think this is awful and is simply another shining example on why Sharia law should be stopped by any means possible from spreading its diseased tentacles into the West.
What you aren't acknowledlging here is that the US has its diseased tentacles all over the world. Military-industrial bases in how many countries? Do you even know how many? Those people don't want the US in their country any more than you want Sharia law in yours.
edit on 3-6-2011 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Maslo
People do not realize that Islam indeed is a religion of violent savages that do support stonings of adulterers, killing of apostates and so on.
There are hundreds of millions of extremists supporting this, making up significant part of world muslims, often majorities. It is worse than nazism.
This is not in any way an exception or chance.
pewglobal.org...
Originally posted by wcitizen
What I object to is people in the west taking the moral high ground.
I do have an agenda about us westeners taking the moral high ground on these issues.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by wcitizen
What I object to is people in the west taking the moral high ground.
I do have an agenda about us westeners taking the moral high ground on these issues.
So are you saying that it is a Western "moral high ground" to oppose the murder of another human being over antiquated, barbaric religious law?
I find it quite abhorrent to reduce the quite natural humanitarian opposition to murder to a western moral agenda.
Originally posted by nightbringr
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by wcitizen
What I object to is people in the west taking the moral high ground.
I do have an agenda about us westeners taking the moral high ground on these issues.
So are you saying that it is a Western "moral high ground" to oppose the murder of another human being over antiquated, barbaric religious law?
I find it quite abhorrent to reduce the quite natural humanitarian opposition to murder to a western moral agenda.
I found it amusing that he is taking the moral high ground over me taking the moral high ground!
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by wcitizen
What I object to is people in the west taking the moral high ground.
I do have an agenda about us westeners taking the moral high ground on these issues.
So are you saying that it is a Western "moral high ground" to oppose the murder of another human being over antiquated, barbaric religious law?
I find it quite abhorrent to reduce the quite natural humanitarian opposition to murder to a western moral agenda.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by ShadowZion
I would like to believe you. But I have even met quite a few muslims online advocating such things, and online population is usualy among the elite of the country. There are indeed plenty of normal, non-extremist muslims, but I believe these stats are more or less accurate, and the threat of extremism is actually downplayed in western media for some reason, because most people are not aware of the true extent of the threat.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by ShadowZion
That may be true, but in the end it is not important what religious book says, but what majority of people following it think it says, or do in practice. Just like Gandhi said: "I like your Christ, but I dont like your christians." I am not blaming Islam for extremism, I am blaming majority of muslims (at least in non-western countries) for extremism.
I dont have any problems with liberal or moderate muslims whatsoever. Its just that according to my research, they are in the minority in many countries. Not like western politically correct media preach that its the other way around (extremist is defined as someone who would even think about agreeing with stoning married woman for adultery, not whether he supports terrorists or not).