It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
[The general assembly] Urges all state :
To ensure the effective protection of the right to life of all persons under their jurisdiction and to investigate promptly and thoroughly all killings, including those targeted at specific groups of persons, such as racially motivated violence leading to the death of the victim, killings of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities, killings of persons affected by terrorism or hostage-taking or living under foreign occupation, killings of refugees, internally displaced persons, migrants, street children or members of indigenous communities, killings of persons for reasons related to their activities as human rights defenders, lawyers, journalists or demonstrators, killings committed in the name of passion or in the name of honour, all killings committed for any discriminatory reason, including sexual orientation, as well as all other cases where a person’s right to life has been violated, and to bring those responsible to justice before a competent, independent and impartial judiciary at the national or, where appropriate, international level, and to ensure that such killings, including those committed by security forces, police and law enforcement agents, paramilitary groups or private forces, are neither condoned nor sanctioned by State officials or personnel;
In operative paragraph 6 (b), replace any discriminatory reason, including sexual orientation with discriminatory reasons on any basis
During action on the draft resolution on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, the Committee engaged in a debate over and ultimately approved by a vote of 79 in favour to 70 against with 17 abstentions an amendment removing “sexual orientation” as one of the discriminatory reasons that killings had been committed and warranted investigation.
The representative of Benin, on behalf of the African Group, the main sponsor of the amendment, said that sexual orientation had no legal foundation in any international human rights instruments and there was no legal justification to highlight it. St. Lucia stated that listing specific groups was dangerous because it could lead to the omission of some people and legal manipulation by following the letter of the law in an unintended way, while Morocco asserted that such selectivity should be avoided because it accommodated particular interests and groups over others. South Africa added that a formal process to define sexual orientation and its parameters under human rights law was needed to prevent future division on the issue.
On the other hand, the representative of Sweden stated that sexual orientation had often been the motive for extrajudicial killings, and the deletion of the reference would amount to the Committee looking the other way concerning arbitrary executions based on sexual orientation. Both Finland and France noted that the reference to sexual orientation had been included in the resolution since 1999, based on the Special Rapporteur’s concern for homosexuals that had been victims of such crimes – a concern that still persisted. Switzerland pointed out that homophobic violence was still a reality caused by law enforcement forces in many countries.
In the end, the draft resolution, by which the General Assembly would strongly condemn all extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions that continued throughout the world and demand that all States ensure the practice of such executions be brought to an end, had sufficient agreement to be approved by a vote of 165 in favour to 0 against, with 10 abstentions.
A resolution is not a law but, say, a declaration of goodwill.
Only Security Council resolutions permit that actions be taken to enforce them and actions are actually rarely taken.
Originally posted by Manouche
So the final wording doesn't exclude sexual orientation, it's only not singled out.
Originally posted by Manouche
reply to post by Aeons
Had the amendment not be voted, nothing would have changed nowhere. It's only a declaration.
The final text was approved by 165 countries out of 175 not only by Muslim coutries like you are trying to make believe.
The UN has no right to define a crime for a sovereign country.
You probably wouldn't like the UN promulgating laws in your home country, am I right ?
You won't instill what you deem as progress by force. In the long run, only the spread of knowledge and education will achieve this aim.
A little bit of understanding might help, your people whichever it is was not always so 'enlightened'.
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
I don't get what your problem with this is, they are just making them equal to the rest of us, their sexual orientation shouldn't exclude them from being executed if required, while me not being gay doesn't exclude me.
That what I take from this, they are just saying your sexual orientation doesn't make you special, you are still a human being like the rest of us.
that said, I don't agree with execution, but I do agree with equality.
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
Actually ignore what I said, I had to re-read the entire article to actually "get it" yup, it is literally saying:
Being Gay is no longer considered an illegal reason to be executed. I took it competely backwards.
Originally posted by SG-17
Well this is monumentally stupid. At least though we now have a list of all nations that are loose with human rights.
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
well thats too bad... someone call rainbow-man to the rescue of gay "rights" (or whatever gays think they're entitled to just because of their "sexual orientation")