Sarah Palin Is about to become the GOP Lead Candidate for POTUS !

Originally posted by Ancient Champion
I'm not defending her when i say this but i don't see any of yall running in the next election

then you haven't looked very far

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by jessejamesxx


So you don't like Romney because he's mormon? How about because he is responsible for the State version of Obamacare? This is where left and right do seem the same. Some have called romney the "Stealth Progressive". And I even saw him on the news once defending his State version of Universal health care right in the middle of all this debate about Obamacare, I mean the Affordable Health Care Act.

Originally posted by boondock-saint
is the RNC completely friggin nuts ???
I believe they have lost their minds.
Palin cannot win.
She is also too friggin stupid
to hold this office.

She may look nice in a bikini,
but she's got the brains of
a peanut.

I think the RNC should just step
back from the bottle of Jim Beam
and the line of coke, cuz right now
they are just not thinking clearly.

By giving Palin the GOP nomination
you have just conceded 4 more years
to Obama. Congratulations.

edit on 5/26/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)

Keeping in mind that the RNC is most likely in bed with the elitist NWO gang, they would certainly get behind Palin over Ron Paul, because they would not want Dr. Paul to win the nomination - he's an outsider, even to the Republican establishment.

Let's hope she steps in a moose patty early on so she tanks in the polls and bails.

Originally posted by Version100
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus

 

You did not answer the simple question, you went off on some tangent about
"code pink" which had absolutely nothing to do with my commentary regarding
Sarah Palin.

You seem to be inside some little box where you are hearing, seeing, and
responding to, things that have not been said, or even implied.


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0040fe5ab516.jpg[/atsimg]

Who is inside the box when you expect everyone to be cut of of some cookie cutter format of your choosing?

Originally posted by jessejamesxx
Palin - "Dumb Broad"
Romney - Mormon

I think Paul's got a chance!

an update to ur assessment:

Palin - Dumb Broad
Romney - Mormon, Wall Street backed and Illuminati Bloodline
Gingrich - Crooked as a 3 dollar bill
Paul - End of Social Security and Medicare, too radical

please show me a viable choice in that lot ???

there's not one !!!

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by intelinside451

 

Yes, that's exactly right. And the more upset they get, the more they accuse others of being off their meds, off topic, too left/right, too this too that.

As you seem so badly in need of education, let us school you once again.

#1, I am a vet, didn't vote for Obama, and am not democrat or liberal.

#2, I said you were off your meds because your responses are totally out of
context and make no sense, at all.

Which indicates you are not thinking logically and that you are responding
to things you perceive to be happening when they are actually only in your
mind.

Do you think it is logical to make all of the crazy assumptions you keep
making ?

Like I said, you are on a crusade in your mind and anyone that speaks
in any way that you think is bad, irrespective of context, about Sarah
Palin is instantly labeled as "lib", "dem", "them", and thus, in your mind,
has to be taken to task as all the other "libs", "dems", "thems"...

Sir, you are a prime example of the mindlessness that is so pervasive
throughout Western civilization.

Enjoy your bread and circuses.

reply to post by boondock-saint


Face it, there's very few people who will go against the status quo, the ones who do get called names. What this country needs is a kind of political homeopathic remedy.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

Originally posted by Version100
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus

 

You did not answer the simple question, you went off on some tangent about
"code pink" which had absolutely nothing to do with my commentary regarding
Sarah Palin.

You seem to be inside some little box where you are hearing, seeing, and
responding to, things that have not been said, or even implied.


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0040fe5ab516.jpg[/atsimg]

Who is inside the box when you expect everyone to be cut of of some cookie cutter format of your choosing?

This is known as "transference" in the world of psychology.

You are the one who is trying to use a cookie cutter to define
everyone that thinks Sarah Palin unqualified as being a "lib"
"dem" or "them".

Originally posted by Version100

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by intelinside451

 

Yes, that's exactly right. And the more upset they get, the more they accuse others of being off their meds, off topic, too left/right, too this too that.

As you seem so badly in need of education, let us school you once again.

#1, I am a vet, didn't vote for Obama, and am not democrat or liberal.

#2, I said you were off your meds because your responses are totally out of
context and make no sense, at all.

Which indicates you are not thinking logically and that you are responding
to things you perceive to be happening when they are actually only in your
mind.

Do you think it is logical to make all of the crazy assumptions you keep
making ?

Like I said, you are on a crusade in your mind and anyone that speaks
in any way that you think is bad, irrespective of context, about Sarah
Palin is instantly labeled as "lib", "dem", "them", and thus, in your mind,
has to be taken to task as all the other "libs", "dems", "thems"...

Sir, you are a prime example of the mindlessness that is so pervasive
throughout Western civilization.

Enjoy your bread and circuses.

Ya know, I am not a moderator, but could you guys take it outside or stay on topic without getting personal. Or maybe punch each other with U2Us and keep it off the thread. Seems like every single thread gets trolled and baited down to a pissin contest.

Originally posted by Version100

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by intelinside451

 

Yes, that's exactly right. And the more upset they get, the more they accuse others of being off their meds, off topic, too left/right, too this too that.

As you seem so badly in need of education, let us school you once again.

#1, I am a vet, didn't vote for Obama, and am not democrat or liberal.

#2, I said you were off your meds because your responses are totally out of
context and make no sense, at all.

Which indicates you are not thinking logically and that you are responding
to things you perceive to be happening when they are actually only in your
mind.

Do you think it is logical to make all of the crazy assumptions you keep
making ?

Like I said, you are on a crusade in your mind and anyone that speaks
in any way that you think is bad, irrespective of context, about Sarah
Palin is instantly labeled as "lib", "dem", "them", and thus, in your mind,
has to be taken to task as all the other "libs", "dems", "thems"...

Sir, you are a prime example of the mindlessness that is so pervasive
throughout Western civilization.

Enjoy your bread and circuses.

I don't care what you are or aren't. Your comments to me are nasty and vicious. I am not giving you the time of day. You can stew in your own nasty juices.
I have a very good understanding of the left/right hegelian dialectic. Perhaps you ought to stop running around telling people they are off their meds. Frankly, your opinion is just that, an opinion.

Lol, I just saw your post on transference. That's funny. I love how people like you want to appear intellectual so you have to go around using psychology terms. Ok whatever. Have it your way.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by boondock-saint

 

Face it, there's very few people who will go against the status quo, the ones who do get called names. What this country needs is a kind of political homeopathic remedy.

V for Vendetta comes to mind here.
But good luck finding such.

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by jessejamesxx
Palin - "Dumb Broad"
Romney - Mormon

I think Paul's got a chance!

an update to ur assessment:

Palin - Dumb Broad
Romney - Mormon, Wall Street backed and Illuminati Bloodline
Gingrich - Crooked as a 3 dollar bill
Paul - End of Social Security and Medicare, too radical

please show me a viable choice in that lot ???

there's not one !!!

If you listen to Ron Paul talk about that, even he admits that as president, he won't be able to get rid of SS and Medicare, and that at best it would be a process that would have to be undertaken over time. Of that crowd, he is definitely the right one. We NEED radical to defeat radical. Wouldn't you agree? No more tiptoeing around trying to be "PC" - we need to get this country out of the crapper, and fast.

Hey I'm honest... I like her based on her looks.

I have no need for her brain. For brains I already have mine... I dont need hers. But she does have other assets that I will never have there for she could complete me as a human being... a very happy one.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

Originally posted by Version100

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by intelinside451

 

Yes, that's exactly right. And the more upset they get, the more they accuse others of being off their meds, off topic, too left/right, too this too that.

As you seem so badly in need of education, let us school you once again.

#1, I am a vet, didn't vote for Obama, and am not democrat or liberal.

#2, I said you were off your meds because your responses are totally out of
context and make no sense, at all.

Which indicates you are not thinking logically and that you are responding
to things you perceive to be happening when they are actually only in your
mind.

Do you think it is logical to make all of the crazy assumptions you keep
making ?

Like I said, you are on a crusade in your mind and anyone that speaks
in any way that you think is bad, irrespective of context, about Sarah
Palin is instantly labeled as "lib", "dem", "them", and thus, in your mind,
has to be taken to task as all the other "libs", "dems", "thems"...

Sir, you are a prime example of the mindlessness that is so pervasive
throughout Western civilization.

Enjoy your bread and circuses.

I don't care what you are or aren't. Your comments to me are nasty and vicious. I am not giving you the time of day. You can stew in your own nasty juices.

And now you've reduced your argument to "you're mean"...

You've shown that as a vehement supporter of Ms. Palin you are utterly unable to
logically address any issue presented and can only respond by making nonsense
accusations, out of hand labeling, and childishly indignant blatherings, that have
no correlation to the material you responded to.

Best of luck to you.

reply to post by Version100


Best of luck? Ok


Well, since you have brutishly told me I need to get an edumacation like ol Bush, here is my lecture to you on Hegelian Dialectic reasoning as used by those who are undermining our country, and please note the infiltration of that intellectual institution YALE by members of Skull and Bones and the famed RUSSELL Trust.

www.sntp.net...

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Version100

 

Best of luck? Ok


Well, since you have brutishly told me I need to get an edumacation like ol Bush, here is my lecture to you on Hegelian Dialectic reasoning as used by those who are undermining our country, and please note the infiltration of that intellectual institution YALE by members of Skull and Bones and the famed RUSSELL Trust.

www.sntp.net...

Which, once again, has nothing to do with the context of this conversation.

No matter how hard you try to push this onto me it still has nothing to
do with what I originally posted.

You are living in some world where context does not matter, where you
can just keep pushing things that are non sequitur to the dialogue.

I think we all get it that you are unhappy with the treatment of Sarah Palin
but that just doesn't have anything to do with the original subject matter.

I'm most sorry but repeating yourself over and over will not make you
correct.

Get ready for it folks. The country was run into desperate shape before Obama even took office. Since then, the banksters and special interests have illustrated that no matter who is in office, the status-quo is still in effect as long as banksters and special interests (and big corps) are still holding the purse strings. If you thought G.W. was bad, Palin PALES in comparison to even G.W. If you think Obama is bad, Palin PALES in comparison to him. If you think *things in general* are bad right now, imagine what it is going to be like WHEN she is elected, not *IF,* but WHEN. If you've ever read Terry Goodkind's "Wizard's First Rule," then you'll know what I mean right off. What is the Wizard's First Rule?

Wizard's First Rule: People are stupid. They will believe a lie because they want it to be true OR they are afraid the lie IS true.

Most are desperate and reacting instead of thinking.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by jessejamesxx

 

So you don't like Romney because he's mormon? How about because he is responsible for the State version of Obamacare? This is where left and right do seem the same. Some have called romney the "Stealth Progressive". And I even saw him on the news once defending his State version of Universal health care right in the middle of all this debate about Obamacare, I mean the Affordable Health Care Act.

I was just stating the reasons they would have a very hard time making it to the primaries or to potus

Originally posted by boondock-saint
an update to ur assessment:

Palin - Dumb Broad
Romney - Mormon, Wall Street backed and Illuminati Bloodline
Gingrich - Crooked as a 3 dollar bill
Paul - End of Social Security and Medicare, too radical

please show me a viable choice in that lot ???

there's not one !!!

Unless R's have an ace up their sleeve, Paul looks like he would be the most fitting. Foreign policy, the war, and he's a genius when it comes to the economy.

Personally, I feel like this is going to be like the last election. McCain didn't really stand a chance, and Palin was a deathblow. It was either a very desperate "first woman in the whitehouse" move, or it was deliberate so Obama would win, hands down. I feel that this is how the next election will go...but I'll still back Paul til the end. At the very least it will help get his message out there and might bring up important topics.

Sarah Palin is legally retarded. I mean that with every ounce of my soul. I would gladly sign up for ______________ (and it hurts me to say that) if she were elected President. I would _____ ______ against that ignorant woman's _________ any day of the week.

Originally posted by Version100

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Version100

 

Best of luck? Ok


Well, since you have brutishly told me I need to get an edumacation like ol Bush, here is my lecture to you on Hegelian Dialectic reasoning as used by those who are undermining our country, and please note the infiltration of that intellectual institution YALE by members of Skull and Bones and the famed RUSSELL Trust.

www.sntp.net...

Which, once again, has nothing to do with the context of this conversation.

No matter how hard you try to push this onto me it still has nothing to
do with what I originally posted.

You are living in some world where context does not matter, where you
can just keep pushing things that are non sequitur to the dialogue.

I think we all get it that you are unhappy with the treatment of Sarah Palin
but that just doesn't have anything to do with the original subject matter.

I'm most sorry but repeating yourself over and over will not make you
correct.