posted on May, 14 2011 @ 03:25 AM
reply to post by RicoInFlorida
Ok, perhaps your sense of time is different than mine, but when a movie runs 4+ hours, and countless minutes are devoted to watching the lead
character eat, bathe, shave, and urinate, a reasonable person is willing to admit that a bit of editing wouldn't hurt. Of course rather than admit
that, you'd prefer to avoid the issue altogether and instead contend that I'm somehow unable to process the message. Wrong. I'm quite capable of
extracting what this film has to offer, but I do so in spite of the directors' willingness to waste my time with such inanity.
I would think, as an obvious fan of the film, you would be willing to admit these flaws, or at least address and attempt to justify them, in order to
lend some credibility to your praise. Otherwise, you seem like a shill.
I am critical, without being damning. My points ARE valid. No film is perfect, for god's sake.
On to part three...
edit on 14-5-2011 by joechip because: elaboration