WikiLeaks Lake Eerie Ufo's ( full length ) Just released 3rd May 2011

reply to post by gortex


Yes, we must be watching a completely different video because I don't see aviation lights.

reply to post by gortex


Gortex at 5:17 I did see a couple of flashing lights but does that mean or prove its aviation lights, also when the guy zooms in there seems to be a few bright colours there like pink etc.. if it was a plane would the light not be bright white all the time?.

reply to post by KoolerKing

post by KoolerKing
Are you insane

YES....and it's this thread and the others of planes like it that have sent me there .
Man , I believe UFO's are real , and SOME are of extraterrestrial origin , but wanting to believe that planes are UFO's is just ridiculous .

reply to post by gortex


I'll ask the question again. How busy is an airport in lake erie on a tuesday?

Originally posted by SaberTruth

Originally posted by healthyscepticYour video simply shows point light sources. The appearance of the dark edges is simply a common artifact of cheap video cameras (actually it's a sensor readout problem combined with compression articfacts). The very same effect is visible as a dark 'halo' around the aeroplane you showed after.

edit on 12-5-2011 by healthysceptic because: dam speeling mishtakes

It wasn't the dark areas that caught my attention. ;-)

These "light sources" were in an area where I know there are no towers and these were moving. And if they were reflective balloons they shouldn't have gone in opposite directions. I know how bright the landing lights on military aircraft can be even during the day, but this was far brighter. Many others have taken photos of identical orbs with no sign of wires or wings. Granted my camcorder is low-end, but I've recorded many other aircraft and can easily see the details. Plus there's the orb that was right over my head the next day, as I explained in the text I added to my comment.

Too many differences with normal air traffic, IMHO. As for the jet after the orb section, it has an extremely short tail fin and wings; that's why I recorded it. I do actually look with binoculars and not just the camcorder.

Obviously I can't possibly comment on what you saw with your own eyes, nor do I claim to.

But, with respect to the video clip presented, I can conclude in an absolute sense that the objects you recorded were small or distant (way below the resolving power of the cam), and bright (beyond the dynamic range that can be captured by the cam). This is easily confirmed, like I said, by comparing them to the artifacts and characteristics of the plane you filmed directly afterwards. The lights could easily be (from the evidence presented) balloons, largish white birds, helicopters, RC toys, and many other things.

Like I said - I wasn't there, so I can only judge what was recorded.

reply to post by gortex


In the video I posted to you from MSNBC they contacted NASA, FAA, and the Pentagon and none of those sources could say what the lights were and the source from FAA acknowledges "the light pattern seems different from commercial flight paths in the area" - For them to not be able to identify the objects as airplanes seems to me their could be a little more going on. .

From the guy that filmed the " UFO's "

Mr Hill said: 'I've been filming these for a long time and it's just grown to the point where they've let me know, they know I'm sittin' there filming them. 'You know, they come in - every year they've come in closer and closer.'

The original thread Please read the JohnnyAnonymous post on page 1
www.abovetopsecret.com...

The planes are from Cleveland Hopkins International, apparently.

EDIT: beaten to it by Gortex!

reply to post by gortex


Gortex did you watch all of the vid, at 17:00 mins do you really think thats a plane flashing red green blue and orange.

Originally posted by restless genius
reply to post by gortex

 

Gortex did you watch all of the vid, at 17:00 mins do you really think thats a plane flashing red green blue and orange.

It isn't flashing red green blue and orange. It's partly atmospheric movement, but mostly simple chromatic aberations. Again, the recording equipment is been pushed WAY beyond its capabilities.

reply to post by ziggyproductions05

Ok mister high and mighty. I skimmed it the first time but since you are demanding I deny ignorance I watched it all the way through. It's still a damn stationary strobing light miles away from the camera. DENY STUPIDIY!

Yet another one bites the dust.

Relegated to the HOAX bin.

Originally posted by DerbyCityLights
reply to post by ziggyproductions05

 

Ok mister high and mighty. I skimmed it the first time but since you are demanding I deny ignorance I watched it all the way through. It's still a damn stationary strobing light miles away from the camera. DENY STUPIDIY!

Oh its stationary? You still didnt watch the video or even read the rest of the thread did you? Im just trying to help you in future situations. You've created threads here at ATS, how would you feel if people just ignored your OP and the article you reference and started writing obviously misinformed posts? Im sure you wouldnt be too happy..

Seems pretty legit to me. Those are UFO's. I really wish some of you that keep" posting deny ignorance" would take some of your own advice.

reply to post by EnigmaAgent


I don't mind where the mods put this, I find this very interesting I still don't think its planes though.

reply to post by gortex


that guy is definitely out there - thx for pointing that thread out i hadnt seen it yet. In addition to his footage, there has been a lot to come from the Lake Erie area from many others and in spring of '10 there was a UFO flap with hundreds of witnesses. I think if anything these could be some kind of experimental aircraft or were maybe using different kind of lighting figurations on their aircraft.

reply to post by ziggyproductions05


No I had not seen that thread either, I did do a search on ATS about this but the reason that thread never came up is because the title is different and does not mention lake eerie.

Thanks for your comments and everyones comments, I'm off now to watch inside the human body be back on later.

I liked it too OP. Some people just reject things just to reject things. Thank you for posting it.

Where the hell do you get the wikileaks part? That is just BS. Remove it from the topic or I'll report to mods.

[edit to add] Oh that site. That is not wikileaks. Wikileaks is trademarked and I've reported this to JA. No mods needed but this could as well be sent to hoax bin.

reply to post by PsykoOps


Do you work for weki leaks? what are you so mad about? Easy newfinland