WikiLeaks Lake Eerie Ufo's ( full length ) Just released 3rd May 2011

reply to post by gortex


I did not see aviation lights, one of the ufo's seems to hover for a good while I have never seen a plane do that, and I did not realise a shorter version had been posted.

reply to post by FlySolo

I'm no expert but that is damn strange. It really seems they are communicating with each other.

I liked it. It was shaky but I know zooming at that distance you cant avoid the shake. The appearance is consistent with other videos. Completely unexplainable. It's other life without a doubt. Advanced travel and what appears to be cautionary distance. They never seem to get close enough. It's as though they have to be careful or have reason to be careful. It tells you something about other things that are out there. Probably from experience, they know to keep their distance. Some of the smaller ones could be probes. We did the same thing on the moon.

Well I wasted 10 minutes of my life, I sure damn wasn't gonna waste another 10. Little lights in the sky, oh wow. (sarc).

It might be the same as what I shot a few years ago (go to the 4:34 mark):



On the video I talk about balloons but I was being sarcastic and giving the likely "official" story. The next day I was out with my still camera and for some reason I sensed something above me. There was another orb, and it was dragging something rectangular behind it. But in the moment it took to raise the camera to my eye, it was completely gone. No wind, no clouds in that area, and I looked all over the sky.

reply to post by ziggyproductions05


Good find

reply to post by FlySolo

post by FlySolo
Can you point out the time where you see aviation lights?

3.34 , 5.09 ,6.02 plus many more ,

KoolerKing
I did not know planes could not move while being in the sky.

They can appear to be stationary when they are coming toward the viewer .

Open your eyes people ... do some research .

There are many airports around the Lake Eerie area ... check google maps

The video is actually pretty interesting... there are a few interesting moves in the video and some pretty cool interaction.

Thanks for posting

reply to post by gortex


I am gonna watch it again and check the times you posted to see if I can see the aviation lights.

reply to post by gortex


What? Dude you need to do some research. They are not moving. This is not a mirage.

What does an airport have to do with anything? Did you watch the video?

reply to post by KoolerKing


Stationary UFO's over an airport .... these to are planes , its called stacking ...

Originally posted by gortex
Since when sis UFO's start using aviation lights ?
These are ... in my opinion , planes , the other video's of Lake Eerie UFO's videos show the the same thing ...planes.
A shorter version of this has been posted before.

100% correct.

SaberTruth...

Your video simply shows point light sources. The appearance of the dark edges is simply a common artifact of cheap video cameras (actually it's a sensor readout problem combined with compression articfacts). The very same effect is visible as a dark 'halo' around the aeroplane you showed after.

Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by FlySolo

 

post by FlySolo
Can you point out the time where you see aviation lights?

3.34 , 5.09 ,6.02 plus many more ,

KoolerKing
I did not know planes could not move while being in the sky.

They can appear to be stationary when they are coming toward the viewer .

Open your eyes people ... do some research .

There are many airports around the Lake Eerie area ... check google maps

edit on 12-5-2011 by gortex because: (no reason given)

I gave you the benefit of the doubt and looked at 3:49 and 5:09. I stopped there because CLEARLY it is way to far to be able to see any aviation lights over the intense brightness. I think you are seeing what you want to see.

As for the stationary illusion, a little math shows a plane traveling 300 kms/hr in 20 minutes would be 15km out. Yet the intensity of the light remains the same.

So here we go with the usual tried techniques to debunk a stationary light. A plane coming in for a landing but yet "WE" can see the aviation lights from 15 kms away?

Open your mind

ETA: actually, it must be even more than 15km out because in 20 minutes it should be directly overhead but its not.

reply to post by KoolerKing

]post by KoolerKing
What does an airport have to do with anything? Did you watch the video?

Because thats why these planes are stacking over Lake Eerie ... they are holding waiting to land .
They are not stationary , they are traveling toward the camera

Deny ignorance , man this thread is full of it

Originally posted by FlySolo

Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by FlySolo

 

post by FlySolo
Can you point out the time where you see aviation lights?

3.34 , 5.09 ,6.02 plus many more ,

KoolerKing
I did not know planes could not move while being in the sky.

They can appear to be stationary when they are coming toward the viewer .

Open your eyes people ... do some research .

There are many airports around the Lake Eerie area ... check google maps

edit on 12-5-2011 by gortex because: (no reason given)

I gave you the benefit of the doubt and looked at 3:49 and 5:09. I stopped there because CLEARLY it is way to far to be able to see any aviation lights over the intense brightness. I think you are seeing what you want to see.

As for the stationary illusion, a little math shows a plane traveling 300 kms/hr in 20 minutes would be 15km out. Yet the intensity of the light remains the same.

So here we go with the usual tried techniques to debunk a stationary light. A plane coming in for a landing but yet "WE" can see the aviation lights from 15 kms away?

Open your mind

edit on 12-5-2011 by FlySolo because: (no reason given)

12:21 (i think) is definately a plane. They're all planes.

As to the seeming intensity of the lights, in those conditions any bright light will easily saturate the sensor, meaning everything has the apparent same intensity.

Open you're mind. We learnt how to fly over a century ago. No aliens required.

reply to post by gortex


Care to show the airport on the lake? Just because stacking is the answer for lights at an airport doesn't refute lights hovering over a lake.

reply to post by FlySolo

post by FlySolo
As for the stationary illusion, a little math shows a plane traveling 300 kms/hr in 20 minutes would be 15km out. Yet the intensity of the light remains the same.

We must be watching different video's because I dont see anything staying stationary for 20 min .

reply to post by gortex


Are you insane? Really? Those planes are not in a holding pattern. How many planes are landing at a lake erie airport on a tuesday night?

Originally posted by healthyscepticYour video simply shows point light sources. The appearance of the dark edges is simply a common artifact of cheap video cameras (actually it's a sensor readout problem combined with compression articfacts). The very same effect is visible as a dark 'halo' around the aeroplane you showed after.

edit on 12-5-2011 by healthysceptic because: dam speeling mishtakes

It wasn't the dark areas that caught my attention. ;-)

These "light sources" were in an area where I know there are no towers and these were moving. And if they were reflective balloons they shouldn't have gone in opposite directions. I know how bright the landing lights on military aircraft can be even during the day, but this was far brighter. Many others have taken photos of identical orbs with no sign of wires or wings. Granted my camcorder is low-end, but I've recorded many other aircraft and can easily see the details. Plus there's the orb that was right over my head the next day, as I explained in the text I added to my comment.

Too many differences with normal air traffic, IMHO. As for the jet after the orb section, it has an extremely short tail fin and wings; that's why I recorded it. I do actually look with binoculars and not just the camcorder.