It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by megabogie
before it was removed, here is the RSOE report
hisz.rsoe.hu...
Nuclear Accident at Plant in Mississippi USA gets Totally Ignored!!! Why?,
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
Something weird at a nuke plant in Georgia too...www.abovetopsecret.com... on April 25.
Originally posted by ANNED
Nuclear Accident at Plant in Mississippi USA gets Totally Ignored!!! Why?,
Where is the accident,
This was not a accident is why its not listed as one.
This was a intentional release.(hazardous waste dumping)
If this is classed as a nuclear plant accident then you must class any accident where cobalt-60 from old X-ray machines find its way into the scrap steel stream as a nuclear plant accident.
The Goiânia accident was a radioactive contamination accident that occurred on September 13, 1987, at Goiânia, in the Brazilian State of Goiás. Considered one of the worst nuclear disasters in history,[1] it took place after an old radiotherapy source was stolen from an abandoned hospital site in the city. It was subsequently handled by many people, resulting in four deaths and radioactive contamination of 245 other people, 20 of who showed signs of radiation sickness and required treatment
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
This is looking like a seriously grim trend.
Maybe it's time for you do create a thread with a more generic title outlining all this, muzzleflash! Or get a mod to change this title?
Lucens partial core meltdown (Switzerland), 21 January 1969. A test reactor built in an underground cavern suffered a loss-of-coolant accident during a startup, leading to a partial core meltdown and massive radioactive contamination of the cavern, which was then sealed
Some sources on CDF consider core damage and core meltdown to be the same thing, and different methods of measurement are used between industries and nations, so the primary value of the CDF number is in managing the risk of core accidents within a system and not necessarily to provide large-scale statistics.