Media Scrambles as Bin Laden Story Crumbles

Since the night this story broke, my husband has been keeping track of the "story" from the very beginning, and each day after. He's been recording different comments, especially some of the interesting ones made by Sanjay Gupta, cnn's doctor, in regards to just how the military performed that dna test on Bin Laden.

The stories change and vary from day to day. The facts are shifted.

Obama indeed did say that he watched this all go down in "real time". Then that story changed. Just like how Bush said he watched the first plane hit the WTC.

My husband went to visit our doctor, who happens to be a good friend of his, and lives within the same vicinity as us. And he asked him about Sanjay Gupta's amazing story about how the dna was taken and processed so quickly. And you know what our doctor did? He laughed and laughed. That was enough there for me to see that this whole freaking thing is fabricated.

What I see is, a story. Then that story starts tumbling around, and it morphs into other tales. Just the way a child lies and adds to another tall tale, and the hole keeps getting deeper and deeper. The tale gets taller.

I have to wonder if anyone else has been recording and paying close attention to what people are saying since last sunday. It truly has been interesting. My husband and I are going to keep recording everything, and he wants to put all of this into a video. The inconsistencies of these tales are amazing.

reply to post by burntheships

My question is....could this all be intentional? Have they made it so confusing on purpose...obfuscate the matter as a grand tactic? I am curious to hear from everyone about this.

OBL has been out there, for the last decade, probably to fill a moment just like this. This isn't to say that it was OBL that was killed and dumped at sea, or that he was alive or even a real person to begin with. But he filled a certain position, both for those of us in the west and the jihadists.

So, why now? Whether real or contrived, dead or alive, why was he publicly killed off at this moment?

Think of the whole sordid 9.11 thing as a stage play or a TV series like... oh, Desperate Housewives. There is a plot and it likely changes over time; tweaked and adjusted by the writers to create a larger audience and make the ratings. Characters are killed off regularly and so too, for a reason.

This drama is going somewhere... and OBL's part was finally eliminated. This act will lead to something and it is only a matter of time and paying attention to the world stage to discover exactly what.

Don't touch that dial!

Was talking to a close friend about OBL last night at the pub. He laid it out for me how it went down, but I was so #ty that I forgot most of what he said, LOL!

I do remember him saying that the swat team didn't actually kill him, and he has evidence from a trusted associate that he was dead before the swat team even arrived on the scene.

I've seen the many conflictions and contradictions in the news, and it's made me be totally turned off from trying to gather up a sense of what happened. Until last night, I thought that I'd never find out what really went down. Now, I was told in detail the full story, and don't even remember it.



I'm slippin', lately...

reply to post by Watts


It's funny how the media always mentioned the "Al Qaeda insurgents" that we were fighting in Iraq. Most of them were Iraqis, fighting for their country and their livelihoods. Their lives had totally been uprooted and destroyed. Not to mention the 500,000 armed members of the military that that were hastily let loose. If you haven't seen this movie, you need to...


www.noendinsightmovie.com...


It shows what an incompetent bunch of baffoons our government was in the early years of the Iraq war. They pretty much did EVERYTHING wrong.

Originally posted by randomname
if they would have just focused on bin laden, they could have just killed him, declare the war on terror over and everybody can go on with their lives.

but this perpetual fear they have going, with no end in sight is depressing and destroying the fabric and mood of the nation.

If you have read 1984, that is all part of the plan. Cast fear into the masses. Fear is a control mechanism, and that is why it works to get people to give up rights.

And it has become quite clear that 1984 is being used as a blueprint.

Relating to that, I have noticed the "spellcheck" function no longer has words it used to. In 1984, the idea of reducing the language was put forth to disallow ideas to be formulated that were not "party line."

On topic... I am unsure whether this is more distraction - perhaps We should be watching the world still - or just a rushed and poor job. One would think They would have put more effort into verisimilitude of the charade - was it a sudden choice to "kill" the bin Laden Goldstein? "Gee, we need a distraction... Hey! bin Laden is of no real use. Let's "kill" him off. Quick, look for a plausible location and situation and we'll wing it as the story develops."

I think the OP may be on to something. This may also be distraction.

reply to post by Aeons

The date and time of the raid was Moinday, May 2, 2011, at approximately 1:30 a.m. Abbattobad local time.

This is the first date and time I heard on SkyNews moments after the announcement from the US president, and I haven't seen it vary from this in the "official story."

Initially, the rumormill was pumping out speculation that it had happened days or even up to a week before the announcement, but that was never official as far as I can tell.

Originally posted by Watts
I just wanna know why there wasn't this same fervor with Bush's Iraq war and the blatant lies. That whole country is wrecked for the forsee-able future and everyones fine with it.

What were the blatant lies from Bush that you are referring to? You people fail to realize that Bush did not lie about anything. It has now been proven and made public that the only person who lied was an Iraqi intelligence officer who was a "spy" for us, who was feeding our government the info about Hussein's WMD. He wanted Hussein out, so he lied to us. Our whole government believed what we were fed. Bush did not lie. There is a difference. I really wish you people would get your heads out of your asses and get your facts straight before you go around calling someone a liar.

reply to post by burntheships


The media has made an abortion out of the whole Usama Bin Laden death.

No photos of OBLs corpse.
No photos of OBL while he was being watched by the CIA (as sky news claims)
Several changes in the official story.

This whole OBL story is a stinking pile of horse#. Those who trust and believe the government can do as they please. It does not change the fact that grand claims are being made with ZERO evidence.

reply to post by burntheships


I don't see why they would know everything. In less than an hour a team of seals bashed in, killed everyone in sight, and didn't even stay to clean up the bodies. They wanted one man. They took that one man and ran. Why should they have known everything?

Oh, and yes he was totally assassinated. You see, he knew too much. Why do you think he ditched the cia to fight the cia?

Originally posted by dalepmay

Originally posted by Watts
I just wanna know why there wasn't this same fervor with Bush's Iraq war and the blatant lies. That whole country is wrecked for the forsee-able future and everyones fine with it.

What were the blatant lies from Bush that you are referring to? You people fail to realize that Bush did not lie about anything. It has now been proven and made public that the only person who lied was an Iraqi intelligence officer who was a "spy" for us, who was feeding our government the info about Hussein's WMD. He wanted Hussein out, so he lied to us. Our whole government believed what we were fed. Bush did not lie. There is a difference. I really wish you people would get your heads out of your asses and get your facts straight before you go around calling someone a liar.

Wow, we've finally located the sole fan of George Bush on ATS. I thought it was just an urban legend. Attack!

reply to post by Watts




My answer to this- gentrification, technology, WAR, demoralized veterans, too much death, recession, bail outs...

Obama was part of the script. If you didn't go for Obama then the Zionist central banking Rothschild family backup was war mongering McCain. McCain is a petty man living in the shadow of a brave father.

That seems to always be the m-o of these nwo pissants. Spineless sons of brave fathers. Although their brave fathers were also crooks.

Google "Prescott bush coup"

Wiki is not correct ,, It was May1,2011 on Sunday and it aired about 11:30 I watched it on ABC

content.usatoday.com...

It is now being called Propaganda now by some of the media lol ,, I thought to myself what the heck now the media is backing off on all of this lol. I have been trying to save as much as I can so I have a lot of dated media . I wanted to do this just to prove that there are tons of discrepancies if not that real lies
,,,

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by burntheships

 

I don't see why they would know everything. In less than an hour a team of seals bashed in, killed everyone in sight, and didn't even stay to clean up the bodies. They wanted one man. They took that one man and ran. Why should they have known everything?

Oh, and yes he was totally assassinated. You see, he knew too much. Why do you think he ditched the cia to fight the cia?

edit on 7-5-2011 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)

Nice hypothesis but you are wrong. OBL was dead by 2002.

Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by Aeons

 

The date and time of the raid was Moinday, May 2, 2011, at approximately 1:30 a.m. Abbattobad local time.

This is the first date and time I heard on SkyNews moments after the announcement from the US president, and I haven't seen it vary from this in the "official story."

Initially, the rumormill was pumping out speculation that it had happened days or even up to a week before the announcement, but that was never official as far as I can tell.

edit on 5/7/2011 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)

LOL. That's why Obama was on my Rothschild tv Sunday @ 10:30 pm saying they killed osama.
Haha. This is such a joke. Anyone younger than 28 shouldn't even be discussing this because you were likely raised on fluoride and your pineal in your brain is likely calcified

reply to post by DONTBEIGNORANT


You say that but I simply don't know. If it was for political reasons, I think then Bush would have done so.

I have yet to see any reason to doubt the story. And I don't quite seem to see why they would fake it. Makes no sense. Obama got a mere 5 point gain in the polls too. There simply is nothing gained from this.

reply to post by burntheships


There is one theory that 9/11 was SUPPOSED to look like a huge coverup, and when finally proven to be, the masses will demand a new government to replace the current one... Conveniently, a global government will be advertised as uncorruptable and the masses will demand for it.

How do we even know a "daughter" of OBL said anything? Out of all these lies you believe this piece of the story? Sorry, anything this contrived, and EVERYTHING spit out by the MSM/Government is suspect.

This is a meme SO tasty most everyone wants to believe. The military certainly wants to believe, and why not?

Most likely, OBL was already dead. The raid killed OBL associates and family.

And, outed a previously secret helicopter type!

reply to post by sprtpilot


Actually, we learned it was a cloaked variety of black hawk. Not a new helicopter.

"We donated a $60 million helicopter to this operation. Could we not afford to buy a tape measure?", as Obama put it.

And Osama has a huge family. not all agree with him. Some even want him dead. In addition, there was nothing gained by this event. So there is no logical reason to assume it to be fake. Assume it is real until factual evidence says otherwise.

"the more things change, the more they stay the same,"

What have we accomplished?