It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by boondock-saint
This is the reason why I come to this site. (S+F)
And yes, I'm still voting for you.
Originally posted by Logman
WTF IS A LFBC.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by boondock-saint
My question would be this. If the opera they portray is false, WHAT could be so damning that the truth holds?
If they think this has honestly answered the issue, they might have to think again. Then again, with the way the country is going, maybe they want this issue to continue to distract.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
ok, here's where I am right now.
I saw what I thought was
initials of of CIA-61 and initials of
Allen Welsh Dulles and Keny.
This was proved wrong. Sorry, my bad
eye sight
Then they said it was bleed over ink
from Obama's short form BC underneath
which it is, I found Obama's name underneath.
However in finding Obama's short form underneath
I also found a VOID hand written on it too.
So that's where I stand at present.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by boondock-saint
This is the reason why I come to this site. (S+F)
And yes, I'm still voting for you.
Originally posted by RicoMarston
the DNC confirmed his citizenship before they would even have allowed him to run in the primaries.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by RicoMarston
the DNC confirmed his citizenship before they would even have allowed him to run in the primaries.
ummm
would that be the fake short form
or the VOIDED short form Obama
showed the DNC ???
just asking
cuz he didn't have a long form until
now. And there is at least 1 short form
Obama BC that is voided as shown
in the bleed over ink.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by boondock-saint
This is the reason why I come to this site. (S+F)
And yes, I'm still voting for you.
You didn't read the whole thread? Obviously.
Blind faith. Is sad.......
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
So where you stand is that the first point you made which you were CONVINCED was the truth has been found to be yet another FAIRY TALE EASILY BELIEVED BY THE GULLIBLE...
So you have concocted YET ANOTHER FAIRY TALE...
Originally posted by micpsi
The text is not CIA-61. It's OAHU. You mistook the capital letter "O" for the capital letters "CI". This is the island of birth of Obama, according to the short form
www.barackobamabirthcertificate.net...
Just above the horizontal line below the title "Certificate of Live Birth" is the faint heading "HOUR OF BIRTH". This is because there is for some reason an impression on this certificate of most or all of the short form Certificate of Live Birth issued by Obama's people during the election campaign in 2008. Evidence of this is the heading "SEX" that is visible on the right of "File Number 151". It corresponds exactly to the position of the same word on the old document! There is also a lot of writing in the box entitled "19a. Signature of Attendant".
Unless someone can explain how the short form version of the Certificate of Live Birth (or some of it, at least) could come to be on the long form, the latter has to be a forgery.edit on 28-4-2011 by micpsi because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Hessling
reply to post by boondock-saint
Couple of more tidbits from Michael Rivero at www.whatreallyhappened.com to share:
Kenya (listed as Obama's father's nation of birth) wasn't called Kenya in 1961. It was the British East Africa Protectorate. It was not known as "Kenya" until 1963.
In 1961, the hospital Obama was born in was NOT named the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital , as shown on the above certificate. In 1961, the hospital Obama was born in was named the Kauaikeolani Children's Hospital. It did not change its name to the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until it merged with the Kapiolani hospital system in 1978.
What the hell is going on here folks?
This just has to be a distraction. Now comes the big question: a distraction from what?
Originally posted by Furbs
This is a serious question, and I would like a serious response.
Since you admit to being wrong about the CIA-16 business, is it within your realm of possibility that you are mistaken about the VOID as well, or are you once again infallible because no one has proven it wrong?