It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NellahB
reply to post by Caji316
Found this today:
www.wnd.com...
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
Originally posted by Danbones
www.kapiolani.org...
the addresses are not matching with the birth certificate
Stop it .. &*#& .
Do you really think anyone would be this #ing retarded ? You think that the people running your country are so incompetent that they could not get the address right on a forged document ?
There is no way to debunk the bc. Even if it was faked (it is not, get over it) you would never know.
Birthers have nothing left but other stupid birthers to tell each other that they still think he is from Kenya .. for no reason at all ... other then the he is a different color then you.
Originally posted by derst1988
no one cares that he is black, get over it.
Originally posted by Katie
Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecolegical Hospital didn't use that name until 1978.
Maybe he has a hidden agenda with Bin Laden. Where is Bin been these days? Living in the basement of the White House. I'll see if I can find a picture of these 2 together or Barracks father.
Originally posted by Perplexity
reply to post by General.Lee
Ironically you spelled his name Wrong in your post... when the image you posted was his name... guess that speaks loads about your intelligence level. Also, using GIMP just screams out ignorance, you have no clue what you are talking about here so it'd be best to just quit while you're behind. Gimp is such a low tier application it can distort any image while imported. Do some research if you're going to act like you "cracked the case!"
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
Originally posted by derst1988
no one cares that he is black, get over it.
Explain why anyone would think he is anything but American ?
Keep in mind we never heard anyone ask for Clinton's or Bush's bc ?
What software are you planning to use?
From a recently generated pdf using LaTeX, I have this: Version 1.4 producer: pdfTeX-1.40.3
When using print to pdf (this web page in safari) I get version 1.4, producer Mac OS X 10.5.6 Quartz PDFContext.
Originally posted by PrinceDreamer
People should download the original and save it, because I suspect the PDF will be altered very soon and the layers merged, no doubt those then that bring the matter up will be called frauds and accused of faking it.
Excellent post OP well done S&F for you
Originally posted by Rekrul
its defiantly illustrator. i went to college for graphic design and i know my programs. the layers are there, no doubts about it. i had my suspensions to begin with. the government can do anything, even con its own citizens. notice how the criminal president keeps trying to drop the subject. he has more important things to do, like talk to opera.
s+f
Originally posted by zerohistory
reply to post by derst1988
Yes, we do know what program created the PDF. A PDF contains metadata that identifies the program that was used to produce the PDF. This applies to any PDF. (For reference, the same thing happens with digital photos.) All you need to do is open any PDF reader/viewer and prompt the application to view the PDF's metadata details.
As regards to Obama's long-form birth certificate, in PDF format, I have now opened the PDF in three different programs. I've used Mac OS X's Preview, PDFPen Pro, and Adobe Photoshop CS4. Viewing the metadata in each of those programs (each developed by different software companies) confirms that Obama's long-form birth certificate, in PDF format, was produced in Mac OS X 10.6.7 Quartz PDFContext. That's two pieces of vital information. The computer operating system and the PDF application are identified.
I use Mac OS X 10.4.11. So it's absurd to draw the conclusion that the applications on my computer would even know anything about Mac OS X 10.6.7, or the applications that are available for it. No, the PDF viewers on my computer are simply reading the metadata that is embedded into the PDF-formatted version of Obama's birth certificate.
You quoted the following quote:
What software are you planning to use?
From a recently generated pdf using LaTeX, I have this: Version 1.4 producer: pdfTeX-1.40.3
When using print to pdf (this web page in safari) I get version 1.4, producer Mac OS X 10.5.6 Quartz PDFContext.
There is a simple explanation for that. Printing a PDF on any computer with any operating system that is capable of printing a PDF will only use the PDF creation software that is available to be used on that computer. The reason that whomever saw version "producer Mac OS X 10.5.6 Quartz PDFContext" is because his/her computer is running Mac OS X 10.5.6 and so it only has Apple's Quartz PDFContext software that is made to work with that version of the OS X operating system!
And there is no mystery why a PDF that is generated using LaTeX will show in its metadata the version of the software used!
Yes, I really do understand what's going on here.
Originally posted by zerohistory
reply to post by derst1988
Yes, we do know what program created the PDF. A PDF contains metadata that identifies the program that was used to produce the PDF. This applies to any PDF. (For reference, the same thing happens with digital photos.) All you need to do is open any PDF reader/viewer and prompt the application to view the PDF's metadata details.
As regards to Obama's long-form birth certificate, in PDF format, I have now opened the PDF in three different programs. I've used Mac OS X's Preview, PDFPen Pro, and Adobe Photoshop CS4. Viewing the metadata in each of those programs (each developed by different software companies) confirms that Obama's long-form birth certificate, in PDF format, was produced in Mac OS X 10.6.7 Quartz PDFContext. That's two pieces of vital information. The computer operating system and the PDF application are identified.