It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by halfoldman
This issue of wife-beating, like corporal punishment for children and animals, is becoming increasingly unacceptable and emotive in Western countries.
Therefore I must firstly say that I regard any wife-beating as abusive and unacceptable.
However, we do have politically correct multi-multiculturalism in the Western culture, which claims all cultures and customs are equal, and we have no right to judge the legalities of another culture.
Wife beating was common in Christian cultures, and even in high or "decent" middle class society it was considered a private matter, and this was widely accepted and ignored by the churches and law well into the 1980s.
I recall that only a century ago the colonial laws allowed "reasonable" beatings, and beatings with a rod no thicker than the man's thumb.
It has grown to be increasingly unpopular and socially unacceptable.
Of course that doesn't stop real abuse from going on, but abusers can no longer look to religious or legal support, and women are increasingly empowered to stop it.
That means: no Western abuser can honestly say he is beating a woman because his religion and culture tells him to do so.
The male abusers are also increasingly stigmatized and cast out from society.
Christianity increasingly shies away from its sexist verses, and ignores the history of "ducking stools" and other means that once silenced verbose females according to scripture.
However, Islamists openly admit beating a woman is "hononoring her", after the failure of verbal admonishment.
Would the multiculturalists and "tolerant" people say we should allow special laws to allow for such "gentle" beatings?
To be consistent, I guess they should?
It is clearly instructed in streams of Islamic culture:
edit on 26-4-2011 by halfoldman because: (no reason given)edit on 26-4-2011 by halfoldman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SonofPeleus
reply to post by poet1b
"All your claims do nothing to counter the reality that the nations who respect women as equals are the nations who are the most prosperous, and develop most of the technology that allows humanity to advance."
Most prosperous nations? Like USA? Last time I checked, your country was 14 trillion dollars in debt to the rest of the world. Please don't be delusional.
If a woman harmed her children, should she not be punished? When a woman is on a course to break up her family through wrongdoing, publicising her intent to commit adultery , she is shaming her husband, herself, her parentage and her children. Fifty percent of Americans come from broken homes so I understand why you cannot grasp my point. The damage has already been done. When children see how weak the bonds are between mother and father, husband and wife, nothing is sacred anymore. Worse yet, as children are introduced over time to a slew of mother's new boyfriends, what message is being sent? Mother is no better than a common whore? Your values have become bastardised.
You seem to believe slapping an immoral woman is a crime when rather it is the punishment. Household affairs should be run like a courtroom: there must be consequences to wrongdoing. When there is no fear of reprisal, we are free to do whatever we please with impunity. Which is worse: a slap to the face or the total collapse of morality? Don't be so short-sighted. It seems your 'good' people will try to do anything to avoid punishment and accountability for sins. That is the way of the weak and the wicked.
Originally posted by dawnstar
Originally posted by SonofPeleus
reply to post by poet1b
if 50% of the children in america are living in single parent homes, then I am willing to bet around 50% of those children have FATHERS THAT ARE WITHOUT MUCH MORAL STANDING who are sleeping around, and well, at least some of those relationships broke up because daddy was beating mommy and children!! not every relationship breaks apart because moms are sluts!! or don't you just not grasp the idea that men are just as crappy as women are?? " there must be consequences to wrongdoing."...those are your words!! but well, then you try to put women in a position where men will not have to face any consequences for any wrongdoing he might want to commit!! Accept the fact that you men aren't women's gods and well, step out of between her and her god, or well, the Real God, just might decide to remove you himself!!!
You sound like a sensible woman. Any partner, be it man or woman, must be faithful to the oaths taken in marriage. Selfish men who are disloyal to their families should, too, first be counselled, then admonished, and, as a last resort, beaten. Beaten by the woman, her father and brothers until he sees the error of his ways.
Originally posted by poet1b
No, the idea that expecting a woman to cover her breasts in public places is somehow comparable with wearing a burqa is juvenile and stupid.