It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jimnuggits
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
Are we all sexist and homophobes too?
How about all of us with mixed heritage?
Originally posted by jimnuggits
reply to post by mishigas
I'm not calling for a 'quota system,' spin ninja. The ratio of 'race' to 'race' should be a mirror image of the society at large, if a group is to be seen as a true representation of the people it serves. Tea Party? Not.
!
Originally posted by LosLobos
reply to post by OptimusSubprime
I have no problem with that. I never thought the Tea Party was "all" racists.
Just like not all people who need government help are lazy. Just like not all public workers are living high off the hog. Just like not all Mexicans are illegal. Just like not all black Presidents are socialists muslims. Just like not everyone needs to show their birth certificate because a bunch of loons want to see it. Just like not all media megastars personally insult the first lady and her children. Just like not all republicans want to do away with social programs. Just a lot of them.
If you agree with that then I will agree not all Tea Party folks are racists.
Deal?
So the best man or woman for the job isn't a plank in the Tea Party movement?
Can you honestly tell this board Trump is a better option than Obama?
Can you honestly tell me all the Republicans who voted to kill old folks is better than Obama?
Let's put this in perspective. Obama wants to save a program that helps everyone no matter what. He wants to institute regulations that help everyone. He wants to shore up our infrastructure. He wants to do things that help ALL of us.
The republicans want to privatize help
They want to give tax breaks to billionaires who don't need it.
History has shown time and time again that cutting taxes DOES NOT CREATE JOBS. It creates wealth for the top 1%
Originally posted by wakeUpOrDie
I notice you never answered if you voted for Barrack Obama. Might that be because the answer is obviously YES!
That explains a lot, that you are easy to dupe because the guy had absolutely no executive experience and spent millions to hide his past. hell he might not even be legally qualified to be POTUS
Not only are you a troll and the ONLY ONE on this thread who thinks Rush Limbaugh is a racist, you have proven that you have no idea how to think. so then you resort to calling me 12 and drinking koolaid! lolol
Originally posted by mishigas
since they voted for Obama simply because he is black.
Originally posted by mishigas
since they voted for Obama simply because he is black.
Seriously??
SERIOUSLY?
You are ACTUALLY arguing that every single person who voted for Obama did so because he was Black?
What would you say if someone said that EVERYONE who didnt vote for him did so because he was black? Would you find that statement to be accurate, too?
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by mishigas
since they voted for Obama simply because he is black.
Seriously??
SERIOUSLY?
You are ACTUALLY arguing that every single person who voted for Obama did so because he was Black?
I dont think I said that, did I? Let me check...nope, I didnt.
Originally posted by mishigas
since they voted for Obama simply because he is black.
Seriously??
SERIOUSLY?
You are ACTUALLY arguing that every single person who voted for Obama did so because he was Black?
I dont think I said that, did I? Let me check...nope, I didnt.
Actually, yes you did. It's quoted right there above. Not sure how you can deny that now
Good thing I tok a screen shot, too, just in case.
Again again here: "I dont think it is a plank. I know its not a liberal plank, since they are overly concerned with quotas, and since they voted for Obama simply because he is black. "
The NBA doesn't represent the people of the US when it comes to laws, genius.
And what's wrong with profit? Have you learned nothing from Enron, Madoff, Worldcom, Lehman Brothers, and AIG?
It's hard to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by jfj123
Care to submit evidence that would suggest Im dependent on social welfare? You do understand the definition of social welfare correct? Shall I define it for you so that you correctly comprehend the term?
Based on your non-argument and continued efforts to portray yourself as an uneducated half wit ( which wasnt to difficult) would suggest that your trolling efforts are baffling at best.
Troll on ~ You do that very well...the only thing you do well.edit on 25-4-2011 by Whereweheaded because: (no reason given)
I like the way you troll but complain I'm trolling
I've posted a bunch of audio and video
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by jfj123
Im fully aware what social programs are. Further, I do not utilize any of the mentioned. You claim you have degrees, and yet have been pointed out by many other posters of your illogical thought processes. Sounds to me your alleged degrees were bought online?
I made valid arguments, that contradicted your statements. I stated that I heard nothing in your submitted source that would suggest anything racist from Rush.
By me questioning the legitimacy of your sources, Im a troll?
Especially when I have asked questions you have yet to identify.