It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by bruji76
Yes, and I will agree with you there. Corporations have taken over the government, but please don't call that capitalism. The elite have been putting their finger in the pie for centuries - this current crop of economic issues is just them taking another step in their attempt to gain total control like when they had the divine right of kings. When people rose up and threw down monarchies / church rule it put a kink in their fun.
Originally posted by Shadowfoot
reply to post by beezzer
Did you even watch the videos through? Sounds like all your doing is making a sophomoric stand on a shaky principle thinking you are being attacked. Please watch the videos and let us know what you think. I am sure that is all the OP is asking for. I shouldn't of been inflammatory for that I apologize. The proof is in the video pudding above.
Originally posted by bruji76
Originally posted by freedish
reply to post by cushycrux
lolololol...
like the tea party are all billionaires...
these videos are not truthful. stop spreading lies.
No, tea party are not ALL billionaires, tea party are mindless sheep mislead by millonaires to follow interests that go against themselves. See the difference.
Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by bruji76
Never said I had the solutions, but I am just trying to enlightening you to some issues I have with your perceptions of how things should work (and you are more then entitled to have your opinion, just trying to have a friendly discussion)
I believe in a smaller government, limited terms, more accountability for those in government. I believe in less government intervention with individuals, and yes, I understand that for some people that means they are going to have to live some crappy lives due to dealing with the consequences of their decisions.
As I read your posts, I picture that you want more government, more regulation - and more social programs?edit on 23-4-2011 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by DougWood3
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Rich people earn more than 80% of this nations wealth, they pay 60% in taxes likewise.
Have a reputable citation for that, because I'm pretty sure you're lucky if they pay 30%? You don't think the rich use every loophole in the book to avoid paying taxes? They have the money to hire teams of accountants to hide, exploit and abuse every loophole to avoid paying taxes.
For instance, the entire company of G.E (made 14 billion in profits last year) paid NOTHING in taxes last year. Yes, you heard me. NOTHING.
And i'm not an accountant (nor have I ever played one on t.v.) but G.E. pays wages to its workers and they pay taxes.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by Stewie
reply to post by bruji76
Capitalism is THE REASON WE CAN DIFFER...ARGUE...DRINK WINE FROM SPAIN.
The thinking person is a fan of regulated capitalism...this allows it to remain a capitalist society for a long time
When capitalism becomes unregulated (dog off leash), it stops becoming capitalism and quickly becomes a corporatism
in the mid 80s, the dog was let off the leash.
we reap what we sow
Originally posted by bruji76
Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by bruji76
To be honest, there hasn't been true capitalism in quite a long time.
In a true market, free of corruption at the higher offices of government - the market would regulate itself (with safeguards put in place)
Free markets are destroyed by capitalism itself via accumulation of wealth that leads to accumulation of power, and consequent abuse of power. Absolute free market is a chimera.edit on 23-4-2011 by bruji76 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Stewie
reply to post by bruji76
I have "had" a corporation, that is, I have created them with others. Corporations aren't necessarily bad...no worse than people in general.
In fact, I can say that I did not ask for, and don't necessarily agree with all rulings that pertain to the "rights" of corporations.
What needs to be understood is this. It is not about corporations. It is not about capitalism. It IS about POWER, and ABSOLUTE POWER.
There is a huge difference. If you can buy judges off, if you have the power to get judges elected? You are corrupt bastard, whether you operate as a corporation, a drug dealer, or a politician...it doesn't matter.
Oh, and the judge should rot in hell too.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by bruji76
Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by bruji76
To be honest, there hasn't been true capitalism in quite a long time.
In a true market, free of corruption at the higher offices of government - the market would regulate itself (with safeguards put in place)
Free markets are destroyed by capitalism itself via accumulation of wealth that leads to accumulation of power, and consequent abuse of power. Absolute free market is a chimera.edit on 23-4-2011 by bruji76 because: (no reason given)
So I guess that means you agree with Obama that someone like he should have the right to specify what is "enough" wealth to accumulate.
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by Stewie
reply to post by bruji76
Capitalism is THE REASON WE CAN DIFFER...ARGUE...DRINK WINE FROM SPAIN.
The thinking person is a fan of regulated capitalism...this allows it to remain a capitalist society for a long time
When capitalism becomes unregulated (dog off leash), it stops becoming capitalism and quickly becomes a corporatism
in the mid 80s, the dog was let off the leash.
we reap what we sow
How so? What kind of regulations would stop capitalism from becoming corporatism? Corporations only exist because of the state, in a free market corporations as we know them today would not exist, so IMHO state imposed regulations would only help to advance corporatism and not stop it.
Originally posted by bruji76
reply to post by neo96
I am still waiting for you to explain how is it?
Who does get rich in capitalist society?
Creative people or lucky manipulative coiners?
Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by bruji76
Guess I am just simply going to have to disagree with you....I do not believe in sharing / division of the wealth so to speak. There are too many individuals who are willing to rest while watching others sweat and toil. I will go so far as to say that even if we all were put in the same social / economic standing you will have a significant portion that are simply willing to do what I said, sit back and let others do the work for them.
Yours is a nice ideal, but simply not practical in society (or for individuals like me)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by bruji76
reply to post by neo96
I am still waiting for you to explain how is it?
Who does get rich in capitalist society?
Creative people or lucky manipulative coiners?
Hey, Starbucks on every corner, and they donate to "sustainable" causes.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
you must have mistaken me for someone who cares to listen to anything you have to say
identify crisis eh theres no such thing as a moderate capitalist either you are or your not your a socialist and yet center of the political spectrum
okayyyyyyyyyyyyy.
Originally posted by bruji76
Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by bruji76
Never said I had the solutions, but I am just trying to enlightening you to some issues I have with your perceptions of how things should work (and you are more then entitled to have your opinion, just trying to have a friendly discussion)
I believe in a smaller government, limited terms, more accountability for those in government. I believe in less government intervention with individuals, and yes, I understand that for some people that means they are going to have to live some crappy lives due to dealing with the consequences of their decisions.
Smaller or bigger government, it doesn't really matter, still the power will be in corporations under a capitalist system.
As I read your posts, I picture that you want more government, more regulation - and more social programs?edit on 23-4-2011 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)
Nope. I think the ideal should be direct democracy, no state and no corporations . People sharing the productive resources in cooperation rather than competition. Productive resources should be public rather than private.