It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Providing a long form would have opened too
many possibilities of being detected as a fraud
as there is quite a bit more details on the LF
like a delivery doctors name, Barry's feetprints,
birth weight, citizenship of parents, etc... etc ....
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
he would have logically had to do...then why the Hell couldn't he have them forge a 'long form' Birth Certificate as well???? The answer is HE COULD.......
ur right he could have.
However, it was NOT required BEFORE he became
president. The short form sufficed to get him in
office. Now that he is already there, there is no
need to produce further fake documents. Plus, Barry
has also signed an EO sealing all his history.
Providing a long form would have opened too
many possibilities of being detected as a fraud
as there is quite a bit more details on the LF
like a delivery doctors name, Barry's feetprints,
birth weight, citizenship of parents, etc... etc ....
Opening up all those other doors of info would have
proven under normal scrutiny that it was fake.
We still do not know to this day, what doctor
delivered Barry. And there is NO doctors signature
on his short form BC only the signature of a gov offical
claiming it is a valid document and even that signature
is only a inked rubber stamp applied to the paper.
But it is not my intention to turn this into a birther thread
either. But it seems it just can't be avoided when we discuss
genetic engineering of a Alien/Human hybrid.
edit on 4/22/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sinnthia
2 questions. Can anyone see that EO besides you?
Sec. 4. Claim of Executive Privilege by Former President.
(a) Upon receipt of a claim of executive privilege by a living former President, the Archivist shall consult with the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other executive agencies as the Archivist deems appropriate concerning the Archivist's determination as to whether to honor the former President's claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding the claim of privilege.
Sec. 6. Revocation. Executive Order 13233 of November 1, 2001, is revoked.
BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 21, 2009
Originally posted by Sinnthia
What line do the feet prints go on?
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Plus, Barry has also signed an EO sealing all his history.
We still do not know to this day, what doctor delivered Barry.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
yes it is freely viewable from the WH website,
but here's your excerpt and link.
they go on the reverse side of the document,
not on the front.
Originally posted by ShakaDoodle
Hey boondock, pay no attention to these worthless detractors. Your thread is by no means a "train wreck", it is simply too deep and subtle in conception for a lot of people to grasp. Look at the works of Z. Sitchen, please dont bring sitchin into this train wreck of a post,many thanks
Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
how in the world would a doctor that performs deliveries everyday be
able to remember whether or not he delivered Obama...
Originally posted by boondock-saint
yes it is freely viewable from the WH website,
but here's your excerpt and link.
Sec. 4. Claim of Executive Privilege by Former President.
(a) Upon receipt of a claim of executive privilege by a living former President, the Archivist shall consult with the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other executive agencies as the Archivist deems appropriate concerning the Archivist's determination as to whether to honor the former President's claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding the claim of privilege.
Sec. 6. Revocation. Executive Order 13233 of November 1, 2001, is revoked.
BARACK OBAMA
Originally posted by dereks
Nothing in there about sealing Barack's personal details, it say "living former President"....
So just another birther lie!
Originally posted by Sinnthia
I guess the onus is on you to back that claim up now, isn't it?
Originally posted by boondock-saint
please read the whole document.
you are taking it out of context.
source then perhaps you can provide everyone with the context you have that apparently others are missing.
Most hospitals in the U.S. issue a souvenir birth certificate which typically includes the footprints of the newborn. However, these birth certificates are not legally accepted as proof of age or citizenship, and are frequently rejected by the Bureau of Consular Affairs during passport applications. Many Americans believe the souvenir records to be their official birth certificates, when in reality they hold little legal value.[25]
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by Sinnthia
I guess the onus is on you to back that claim up now, isn't it?
I have 3 children born over a 2 decade span.
All 3 of them had foot prints on the reverse side
of their BC.
I am not about to post pics of my children's BC
on the internet just to suffice this thread.
Originally posted by dereks
Care to show us the names of the doctors, and their signatures on the long form birth certificates of previous POTUS's? no, funny that,, but then none of them were black, were they!
Just more birther lies.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Basically it is saying that no presidential records of any kind, past or present cannot
be revealed without being approved by the current president (summarized version)
Originally posted by dereks
Nothing in there about sealing Barack's personal details, it say "living former President"....
So just another birther lie!
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by dereks
Nothing in there about sealing Barack's personal details, it say "living former President"....
So just another birther lie!
when the EO states that any presidential info
must get the permission of the current president
BEFORE being released,
it's the same thing as sealing them.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
When you get around to backing up your claim about footprintssource then perhaps you can provide everyone with the context you have that apparently others are missing.
Most hospitals in the U.S. issue a souvenir birth certificate which typically includes the footprints of the newborn. However, these birth certificates are not legally accepted as proof of age or citizenship, and are frequently rejected by the Bureau of Consular Affairs during passport applications. Many Americans believe the souvenir records to be their official birth certificates, when in reality they hold little legal value.[25]