It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by BadPenny
My views on sex are pretty wide open, so it will be hard to convince me of any "sexual trauma" that isn't violent or forcible rape/sodomy.
Calling somebody's Johnson too small, or slapping them on the arse in the shower isn't going to cut it as "trauma." These guys are training to go into war zones, where they will face life and death on a daily basis, surely they can handle a little slap and tickle from their buddies, or some harsh words in a locker room.
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
*Yawn* You guys know how many women get raped in the Military? A lot, and no one throws a pity party for them, but as soon as a few men get their buttholes torn open everyone acts like the world is ending. You can go to any country, America, Australia, Russia, etc and find an extremely high percentage of female rape victims with in the military, but it always takes a story of a few men getting their butts torn to get people to care.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by P3ACE0WAR
I don't believe this is possible. The numbers have to be skewed.
How effective is a soldier that is capable of being raped? I think our soldiers are much more fit, capable, and confident than that. #1, they physically would not let it happen. #2, if they were overpowered by a group, or some other rare circumstance, they wouldn't let the issue drop, they would be seeking justice or revenge, and we would be hearing about this in the press more often.
ETA:
OK, wait, 110 cases, maybe I can believe, but I still don't beleve the 50,000 number that they cited as "sexual trauma."edit on 14-4-2011 by getreadyalready because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by P3ACE0WAR
reply to post by getreadyalready
Are you talking about Western Press?
That's not gonna happen. Men have a lot more dignity to lose for opening up, I mean for god sakes they are in military, the manliest place on planet, they are trained to be tough.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by BadPenny
My views on sex are pretty wide open, so it will be hard to convince me of any "sexual trauma" that isn't violent or forcible rape/sodomy.
Calling somebody's Johnson too small, or slapping them on the arse in the shower isn't going to cut it as "trauma." These guys are training to go into war zones, where they will face life and death on a daily basis, surely they can handle a little slap and tickle from their buddies, or some harsh words in a locker room.
Originally posted by Steve8511
...
Gays or fetishes have no place in the military. If a person likes to have sex with pigeons in his spare time- who cares. But for some reason a man who loves harry butt holes gets a special place? It’s all a political grandstand for votes from a vocal minority.
Yeah the truth hurts.