It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mysticnoon
reply to post by sirnex
Stop eating, take out your heart, take out your brain, prove to me you wouldn't cease to function after that.
You might be interested to read David Chalmer's philosophical zombie argument in relation to the theroy of consciousness where he does, in effect, address your hypothetical position.
Philosophical zombie
Originally posted by sirnex
Originally posted by mysticnoon
reply to post by sirnex
Stop eating, take out your heart, take out your brain, prove to me you wouldn't cease to function after that.
You might be interested to read David Chalmer's philosophical zombie argument in relation to the theroy of consciousness where he does, in effect, address your hypothetical position.
Philosophical zombie
I don't feel it answered my question at all.
If I stop eating, my body dies.
If I remove my heart, my body dies.
If I remove my brain, my body dies.
I've yet to see any verified tangible evidence that I continue to exist as me after bodily death.
And you probably wont until this body dies, but given your position....... "I cant see it so it doesn't exist"
you will only remember until your next incarnation, when you will forget it all over again.
Progression is letting go of the restrictions and boundaries placed on your thinking by our society,
its just like people raving on about the "Big Bang" THEORY, it has all but been debunked as a completely unobtainable theory that lacks any means of proving anything about creation, yet people still quote it as "law" because they can not think beyond the boundaries and refuse to accept that there is more to this universe than the physical.
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by CouncilOfNine
Why would I believe in something I can't see in any fashion? (quote sinex)
I don't believe in any 'thing', all things are mirages pointing us back to the source.
you will only remember until your next incarnation, when you will forget it all over again.
That makes no sense to me. What would be the point if past lessons learned are forgotten? What exactly is the point of relearning everything? (quote sinex)
It makes complete sense. God is all there is, or should i say consciousness is what there is.
However it wants to have experience and the only way a whole thing can experience itself is by looking in the mirror. The mirror makes it look like it is two or more. So it has to split itself, so it can experience.
It is the game of hide and seek. God hides himself from himself and then forgets on purpose and then looks to find himself. When he remembers himself he is liberated from the world of 'things', he sees it has always all been one thing. There are no 'things' as such.
It is all god.
Progression is letting go of the restrictions and boundaries placed on your thinking by our society,
I personally feel progression involves tangible discoveries. Our technology has progressed and continues to progress significantly due to materialist science. Idealist and metaphysical pseudo-science hasn't progressed our understanding one bit, hasn't provided new technologies, hasn't benefited mankind other than through dvd and books sales. (quote sinex)
Our technologies are all part and parcel of god looking for himself. He looks at the 'things' of the world in hope of finding himself.
So the scientists search is also in hope of finding god.
The ultimate truth is there is nothing but god.
The big bang did not happen billions of years ago. This 'now experience' is the big bang banging right now. Prior to this instant there was nothing. You looking at the apparent world is what makes the bang, the bang produces the vision of what is seen.
Conscious observer + waves of probability(nothing)=this experience.edit on 23-4-2011 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)
Why would I believe in something I can't see in any fashion? Dinosaurs certainly don't exist anymore, I can't see them, so I have no reason to believe they exist today. There are many many many many thing's that you and I both agree that don't exist despite never have seen them. Unless you do believe dinosaurs exist today?
That makes no sense to me. What would be the point if past lessons learned are forgotten? What exactly is the point of relearning everything?
I personally feel progression involves tangible discoveries. Our technology has progressed and continues to progress significantly due to materialist science. Idealist and metaphysical pseudo-science hasn't progressed our understanding one bit, hasn't provided new technologies, hasn't benefited mankind other than through dvd and books sales.
I agree with you there, I personally don't subscribe to the big bang theory due to recent observations that to me bring that account of how the universe began in question. Yet what you just said makes me wonder, what if the universe was born from the anal drippings of a cosmic unicorn? We can't prove or disprove it, so it's just as probable and true as the claims you make yourself. If I am to take your unsubstantiated claims with any seriousness, then you should equally entertain the though that perhaps reality was really created from the anal drippings of a cosmic unicorn. Of course, that would imply that we're not really that special... being born from crap and all without any purpose.
That makes no sense to me. What would be the point if past lessons learned are forgotten? What exactly is the point of relearning everything?
Originally posted by VonDoomen
reply to post by sirnex
Sirnex, thought you may enjoy browsing this!
The emergence of the physical world from information processing
Link
Pretty interesting read, regardless what side of the fence you sit on!
Originally posted by mysticnoon
reply to post by Sunlionspirit
Yes, the computer game analogy is very useful for explaining the different levels of consciousness, but I still have a fondness for the simplistic life as a play:
"All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players;"
Here in this world, at the physical level of consciousness, we have identified ourselves so strongly with the parts that we play, that we have forgotten we are merely actors playing the parts. It is for this reason that we experience all the ups and downs of life, and it is not until we can participate in this world as an observer playing a role, that we can journey through this life in a state of equipoise and peace.
Originally posted by sirnex
Yet you would sit there and state that an advanced AI would not be conscious despite passing all consciousness tests, having experiences, acting upon those experience and claiming itself to be conscious.
Why?
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by sirnex
Yet you would sit there and state that an advanced AI would not be conscious despite passing all consciousness tests, having experiences, acting upon those experience and claiming itself to be conscious.
Why?
I didn't say it wouldn't be conscious.
I said you can't know if it is.
You can't observe "having experiences".
This is most definitely a leap of faith, one that I have decided is worthy, considering the research I have done into this area. Some things I have discovered delve into information that is very very believable and through further research I have found that the Illuminati also believe these very thing with incredible conviction.
I suspect that the highest of the order have read the original parchments from the Ark of the Covenant.
It does if you understand how things work. This planet at this time is of 3rd density and is purely a time of choice, you must progress past selfishness, manipulation, etc, (this is the negative path) into love compassion, thoughtfulness, kindness, this is where your progression starts onto the positive path.
This is where we disagree, did you know that ALL our present technology is reverse engineered from spacecraft recovered from Roswell?
and even though you think we are progressing we are not.
The technology we currently know about is minuscule compared to what the US government has in their possession. They give certain items to private enterprise to see what they can make from it, this includes silicon chip technology.
Im sure what I posted has much more relevance than the theory of a universe made from unicorn anal drippings.
I can not help you past this point except to ask you to read it a few times and look into Dewey Larsons work as it will give you much insight into the universe from an astrophysicists point of view.
Well, considering the research I have done and the information I have learned, but with the addition of looking for proven verifiable studies, most I've been able to see is that there are a ton of book and dvd sales going on.
Please post peer reviewed scientific sources.
Oh come on, that's a load of bullcrap! All of our technology is human made without help from ET beaming down crashed spaceships. Seriously...
More complete crap.
I try not to buy books and dvd's. No need to financially support kooks.
Originally posted by sirnex
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by sirnex
Yet you would sit there and state that an advanced AI would not be conscious despite passing all consciousness tests, having experiences, acting upon those experience and claiming itself to be conscious.
Why?
I didn't say it wouldn't be conscious.
I said you can't know if it is.
You can't observe "having experiences".
No, you said it doesn't mean it does, not that you can't know if it is.
So, we can't observe ourselves having experiences?
Most scientists do not like to endorse or indeed study anything they cant work out in a maths equation, this is quite sad really because all it means is that they are very closed minded and living inside a box.
Originally posted by mysticnoon
reply to post by CouncilOfNine
Most scientists do not like to endorse or indeed study anything they cant work out in a maths equation, this is quite sad really because all it means is that they are very closed minded and living inside a box.
In all fairness, the scientists are only restricted by the scientific method as it currently exists. By adhering to the scientific method, they are simply practicing science. What is needed is a revolution in the scientific method itself which integrates inner and outer epistemologies, where the inner domain of experience is not disregarded as irrelevant to scientific observation. Quantum mechanics has already opened the door, and I think in time there will be a much greater integration than exists presently.