It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"I personally think that the White House has caved too much on their demands," McGovern told The Huffington Post. "There's a human face behind some of these cuts. I do lot of work on hunger and nutrition issues. Cutting WIC [Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children], that has consequences. That’s here at home. Domestically, Rajiv Shah, the head of USAID said if the cuts they’re insisting on this year go through, 70,000 children will die. I mean, there’s a human face behind these things.”
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
How about letting us keep our money to feed and clothe our own children? I hate to say it, but if you can't afford to have children, maybe you shouldn't have them.
Originally posted by Caji316
""I wonder where the soul, the compassion is, the empathy in those who don’t care that 70, 000 children, innocent children may die so the American budget can be balanced. Something they are not likely to accomplish anyway'.'"
The people running this country and the world do not have a soul nor empathy....
So do you have a fix for the problem? Because right now we reward irresponsible behavior. How about the state take the children and feed them while the parents that cannot support the kids go with out? No? Then what exactly would you suggest?
Originally posted by Whipfather
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
How about letting us keep our money to feed and clothe our own children? I hate to say it, but if you can't afford to have children, maybe you shouldn't have them.
While I agree, the problem with these consequences is that they punish the children - not any parents that might have made bad choices. And I don't think we can blame children for "being born".