It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by creatednotEvolved
By the way, santa clause is not outside the realm of space and time. He's in shopping malls every year around december.
Originally posted by creatednotEvolved
Originally posted by Kingalbrect79
I have just as much evidence to say that "Santa Clause" created the universe and everything in it because he is outside the realm of space and time and therefore cannot be questioned.
Kingedit on 8-4-2011 by Kingalbrect79 because: Edit to add...
By the way, santa clause is not outside the realm of space and time. He's in shopping malls every year around december.
OKAY....here is the answer...ITS GOD!!!
Originally posted by leemachino
Originally posted by creatednotEvolved
Originally posted by Kingalbrect79
I have just as much evidence to say that "Santa Clause" created the universe and everything in it because he is outside the realm of space and time and therefore cannot be questioned.
Kingedit on 8-4-2011 by Kingalbrect79 because: Edit to add...
By the way, santa clause is not outside the realm of space and time. He's in shopping malls every year around december.
Santa Claus would have to outside the realm of time in order to deliver toys all over the world in one night. I have yet to hear a sonic boom from his sleigh
Originally posted by creatednotEvolved
reply to post by Kingalbrect79
In ancient times, all believed in God because I guess it was more obvious back then than it is now.
The few who did not beileve in God were considered fools and outcasted as mental cases.
Today, they are called the same thing but in a non direct way. Agnostic, which means 'without knowledge'.
What is more insane, to believe in a God who created everything because He is obviously infinitely intelligent
or to believe that a rock, just like the ones you have outside your house, came alive and everything somehow
came to be from that rock.
Maybe if we get the best looking rock outside of our house and we stare at it long enough, it will come alive and eventually it will turn into a beautiful princess we can marry.
Originally posted by Theophorus
I posted this in one thread I was commenting on and thought it would be a wonderful topic here in this forum.
Everyone would have to agree that if we consider the universe we find that everything does exist but very well might not have existed. We ourselves exist, but we would not have existed if man and woman had not met and mated. The same mark can be found with everything. A valley exists because a stream of water took that way down, perhaps because the ice melted up there. If the melted ice had not been there, there would have been no valley. And so with everything.Everything exists,but they would not have existed if some other thing had not been what it was or done what it did.Considering this, none of theses things are an explanation of its own existence or the source of its own existence. In other words existence is contingent upon something else. Each thing possesses existence, can pass it on,but it did not originate its existence.Its essentially a receiver of existence. Thus being said, its impossible to conceive of a universe consisting exclusively of contingent beings.
Question is this: If nothing exists except beings that receive their existence,How does anything exist at all? Thanks for your replies.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by Theophorus
There are no 'evolutionists'.
Now...you're not even asking a question that relates to evolution at all, you're asking about the theological/philosophical question of a universe derived from an idea of pure causation. Frankly, we don't know what happened at the very very very very beginning of the universe, so we can't really answer that question.
So....I don't know. It's a damn honest answer to a dishonestly titled thread.
I suppose you can't, now can you? Your theory of evolution brings you no closer to the truth of how we were created as humans or not.Truth is, is that The Judeo christian faith does. This you can not deny.Now weather or not this truth is valid is up for debate.Problem is ,is that you cant prove the Judeo-christian belief to be wrong, on the contrary Judeo-christians have been waiting for a sufficient answer for many milenia.Bible says that we as man were created. My question remains.
Frankly, we don't know what happened at the very very very very beginning of the universe, so we can't really answer that question.
you said it.
So....I don't know
Originally posted by Theophorus
Your theory of evolution brings you no closer to the truth of how we were created as humans or not.
Truth is, is that The Judeo christian faith does.
This you can not deny.
Now weather or not this truth is valid is up for debate.
Problem is ,is that you cant prove the Judeo-christian belief to be wrong, on the contrary Judeo-christians have been waiting for a sufficient answer for many milenia.
Bible says that we as man were created.
My question remains.
Originally posted by Theophorus
reply to post by madnessinmysoul
I suppose you can't, now can you? Your theory of evolution brings you no closer to the truth of how we were created as humans or not.Truth is, is that The Judeo christian faith does. This you can not deny.Now weather or not this truth is valid is up for debate.Problem is ,is that you cant prove the Judeo-christian belief to be wrong, on the contrary Judeo-christians have been waiting for a sufficient answer for many milenia.Bible says that we as man were created. My question remains.
Frankly, we don't know what happened at the very very very very beginning of the universe, so we can't really answer that question.
you said it.
So....I don't know
haha, I would really like to see you try to start a religion based on santa claus as a creator. You would have to reply to your own posts.