It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama's Faked Photographic Past For All To Clearly See.

page: 9
43
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 12:50 PM
link   
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


Really?



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic

Originally posted by Buford2
Can you honestly say you can sit beside someone with your shoulder down and then bend your elbow to lay your arm across someones shoulder.


Yes. My husband and I just did it.
Keep in mind that the shoulder seam of Grandpa's suit doesn't necessarily indicate the position of the arm underneath. Grandpa's a big man and Obama is smaller. It can definitely be done!


This. If you look at the picture Obama's right arm is blocking ANY view of the grandfather's. This means you have NO IDEA where the elbow is, so even if his shoulder indicates that his arm isn't going straight around to Obama, you can clearly make this sort of pose. Unless the rest of the world has something wrong with their arms that I'm not aware of..



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 12:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by pshea38
I hope this is the right forum for this.

There are about 7 or 8 obama photos altogether, each one analysed and conclusively
shown to have been photoshopped fakery.
Why? has to be the big question....



Please check the link for full details.
This analysis to me is a smoking gun as each and every one of the photographs presented
are proven fakes. Obama has some huge questions to answer.
Why has this not been discussed more and why is obama still in office?


There is no evidence here but vague, and certainly not scientific or even rigorous investigation. There is not one bit of evidence in the bits that you quote which can not be refuted just as easily. To say that the evidence presented here "conclusively" proves anything is just plain nonsense.

The reason that this has not been discussed more is because there is nothing to discuss, as far as evidence goes, this isn't any.




edit on 6-4-2011 by pshea38 because: (no reason given)

edit on 6-4-2011 by pshea38 because: inserted photos

edit on 6-4-2011 by pshea38 because: added photos



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by cushycrux
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


Really?




Had to laugh...what is it with that family..what the hell is Jermane(?) dressed in...just came back from the village people trials?

anyhow, ya...that doesn't look like my family either (wish my family had that family's money though).

and ya, everyone loves Michael...he never had any rumors or issues in his life to assassinate his character...yep, universally loved and respected for his work and love for family/children
-cough-



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:01 PM
link   
reply to post by pshea38
 


Man the Obama bashers are really reaching with this one.



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:06 PM
link   
reply to post by cushycrux
 


The feet are cut off in that version you found. Just look at the original posted picture on the first page. I don't know how you can't see it.
edit on 4/7/2011 by FoJAk because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:08 PM
link   
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


I don't understand...You're afraid of different cultures? Is that what you're saying?


Btw, I got your sarcasm.

edit on 4/7/2011 by FoJAk because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:10 PM
link   
Look I'm not completely sucked into this whole Obama's past is fake thing, but the pictures posted do seem photo shopped. Whether they are originals, I don't know. Not going to look that much into it, though.



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by FoJAk
reply to post by cushycrux
 


The feet are cut off in that version you found. Just look at the original posted picture on the first page. I don't know how you can't see it.
edit on 4/7/2011 by FoJAk because: (no reason given)





Ok, I really see noting. I think you mean the guy on the far right side and you can see on the first pic he feets, and on the one i posted you can see his legs and his back, am I correct?

If you mean the man on the far left, take a long look, his leg is in front of the chair then, not really right? There is a white blanked on the chair.
edit on 7-4-2011 by cushycrux because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by DeepThoughtCriminal
In OP's first photograph all I can see is Stanley Dunham's crotch. Oh god, it cannot be unseen.



Having read that line I glanced across to your name to see who was saying this, imagine my shock as I read deep throat criminal, lol, I agree with your appraisal re the claims in the OP.



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:14 PM
link   
reply to post by cushycrux
 


What I was saying was that the man on the far right has a purple pant leg on his right leg, and a light gray pants or blue jeans on the left leg. If you look at the picture on the first page it is not cropped out like the ones that you keep bringing up and is very easy to see.



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by FoJAk
reply to post by cushycrux
 


What I was saying was that the man on the far right has a purple pant leg on his right leg, and a light gray pants or blue jeans on the left leg. If you look at the picture on the first page it is not cropped out like the ones that you keep bringing up and is very easy to see.


Thats just because the whole picture is too blue, grey always tend to red or blue, look at the pic i posted, this has correct color. The Dark area makes the pinkish tone violet, thats all.



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:19 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Because they are watching center stage and the picture is of him leaving the stage.
Generally when you graduate several people shake your hand and this was probably the last guy as he was walking off stage.



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:22 PM
link   
reply to post by cushycrux
 


The color does look a lot better in that one and is much clearer, but I can't see both feet, so I can't really agree or disagree with you on that.



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:30 PM
link   
This reminds me of those "structures on the moon" pictures where you only see something if you truely want to believe its there.
I think someone took a picture of his textured wall once and people were pointing out mining facilities and all sorts.

Ya...seeing is believing, so long as you start with belief, then push that onto what your seeing.



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:31 PM
link   
reply to post by cushycrux
 


Here we go. Found a good version.



See what I mean. I don't think it's shading. Anywho, I do think these pictures have gotten way too much fanfare for my tastes. I just hope I don't get famous and everybody looks at all of my old fat pictures.
You know what, actually, all of my old photos were faked, I was never that fat!

edit on 4/7/2011 by FoJAk because: (no reason given)

edit on 4/7/2011 by FoJAk because: silly spelling



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:32 PM
link   
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7266f577a34e.jpg[/atsimg]

This picture is funny for so many reasons. First I have to give the guy in the upper left corner props for his shirt. Secondly to the unfortunate soul behind Obama (Barry?)'s afro. And third to the player in the upper right corner that was cut off. Is there a full picture of this available? I can't find it on some searches I did.

Why wouldn't the photographer put the tallest player in the back row as opposed to in the middle? (unless they wanted to frame it as "Obama, future president," which would be even stranger).



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:33 PM
link   
reply to post by FoJAk
 


Look at the man on the right. Look at HIS left pant leg. On the outside of the chair, it's light, but in the shadow if the chair, it's very dark, just like the other pant leg.
It's just in shadow.

As far as his shoes, I'm not sure why people are saying that he has 2 different shoes on. The black stripes that appear to be on his shoes are actually on the woman's dress who sits in front of him. Her feet are tucked under the chair and you can see part of her dress there.



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 




I'm actually dropping the different shoes thing. Looking closely at the latest clean version I found I can see that both shoes do indeed have the Adidas stripes. You can just barely make them out on his left shoe. So, my bad on that one. As for the pant leg, still not sure. Could be shading, could not. Looks weird and possibly photo shopped to me is all.
edit on 4/7/2011 by FoJAk because: secret stuff ,lols



posted on Apr, 7 2011 @ 01:41 PM
link   
racist thread



new topics

top topics



 
43
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join