It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
If you input the word "targeted individual" (TI) or "gangstalking" in a Search Engine you will find Forums, Discussion Boards, Reports and Sites of Millions of Individuals who claim to be victims of Government harassment, Gang harassment, electronic harassment, psychotronic harassment, remote mind control, group stalking.
If most of this is true it is important because it would mean that there is a lot going on that is outrageous and illegal and we`d have to act on it.
If most of this is untrue it is important because it means that there are millions of mentally ill people running around without getting proper help.
No matter which side of the debate you are on, this is an emergency-issue. This thread asks the question whether the majority of this phenomena is due to...
1. Psychotronic/Remote Mind Control Harassment
2. Paranoid Schizophrenia/Mental Illness
3. Demonic/Entity Possession
4. Overactive Imagination
5. Other Causes
There are a lot of people around who seem unable to view this from any other than their own position. I really do think that all five are possible, even after looking into the subject for some time. Meanwhile I have become somewhat a skeptic because in lengthy conversations with TI's I have found that they fail to produce evidence and fail to desire or act for a resolution of the issue much more preferring to remain a victim of overpowering circumstances. I get impatient with this. I ask "Why dont you go have that checked?" and "Why dont you set up a camera at your window?" and "Why dont you have your brain scanned to see whether it is really true if you have a brain implant?" and "Why dont you get help?" but very little initiative comes from these people. I am willing to be open-minded enough to consider that they are really being targeted by psychotronic devices of the Government or that they are really being gangstalked, but are they willing to consider they may be wrong and that their minds are making it all up?
If there is ever going to be some resolution and learning on these issues, they need to be discussed from all sides. No thanks to the media who pretends the problem does not exist.
Thoughts?
edit on 3-4-2011 by Skyfloating because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Skyfloating
If you input the word "targeted individual" (TI) or "gangstalking" in a Search Engine you will find Forums, Discussion Boards, Reports and Sites of Millions of Individuals who claim to be victims of Government harassment, Gang harassment, electronic harassment, psychotronic harassment, remote mind control, group stalking.
If most of this is true it is important because it would mean that there is a lot going on that is outrageous and illegal and we`d have to act on it.
If most of this is untrue it is important because it means that there are millions of mentally ill people running around without getting proper help.
No matter which side of the debate you are on, this is an emergency-issue. This thread asks the question whether the majority of this phenomena is due to...
1. Psychotronic/Remote Mind Control Harassment
2. Paranoid Schizophrenia/Mental Illness
3. Demonic/Entity Possession
4. Overactive Imagination
5. Other Causes
There are a lot of people around who seem unable to view this from any other than their own position. I really do think that all five are possible, even after looking into the subject for some time. Meanwhile I have become somewhat a skeptic because in lengthy conversations with TI's I have found that they fail to produce evidence and fail to desire or act for a resolution of the issue much more preferring to remain a victim of overpowering circumstances. I get impatient with this. I ask "Why dont you go have that checked?" and "Why dont you set up a camera at your window?" and "Why dont you have your brain scanned to see whether it is really true if you have a brain implant?" and "Why dont you get help?" but very little initiative comes from these people. I am willing to be open-minded enough to consider that they are really being targeted by psychotronic devices of the Government or that they are really being gangstalked, but are they willing to consider they may be wrong and that their minds are making it all up?
If there is ever going to be some resolution and learning on these issues, they need to be discussed from all sides. No thanks to the media who pretends the problem does not exist.
Thoughts?
edit on 3-4-2011 by Skyfloating because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TruthDamnTruth
reply to post by Skyfloating
The problem with targeting individuals it's a boring job, I don't see how anybody can waste there time watching someone pick there nose and sit down eating popcorn while watching tv, I mean come on? If they do target individuals it's a waste of time and money. I am not disproving the theory, I am just saying the truth.
Originally posted by ManInWonderland
reply to post by nomnom
If your brain doesn't send "signals" that can be received, then there's no way (that I know of) for anyone to read your mind, period. What would they be reading? There's nothing there to read until you get the scanner close enough to the brain. A signal is typically simply an electromagnetic field. If the EM fields the brain creates are only a few feet in diameter, then the scanner would have to be within a few feet of the person whose mind is being read to accomplish any such reading. How did you think it would work?
If you have time, could you also elaborate on what you find hard to follow on my blog and why? I guess my brief argument about why not all synchronicity can be explained by chance is a bit hard to swallow for a lot of people. And in some cases I've acknowledged that I need to study something more or write a proper section in the future. But other than that?
Regarding synchronicity, did you read the quotation from Philip K. Dick? He didn't say it happened only with one character, but with many. Don't you think that that kind of thing is so unlikely that paranormal explanations seem more acceptable than pure chance explanations?
I have some stunning pseudo divination experiences I could share with you, but if that PKD quotation strikes you as normal, you wouldn't have much difficulty ignoring my stuff either. Let me ask you a question though. Consider this scenario: you have a book that has 140,000 words. You want to think of a question, to open the book at random, and to find an apt response to that question where ever your eyes first glance at the pages. The response would usually be within 10 to 30 words, so that if the book included five apt responses to your question, you would have a 0.07% chance of glancing at one of the words contained in the response (which you would then read from the beginning). That's one in 1,500. You would choose a question that you'd imagine the book would be able to respond to no more than five times in any circumstances (it's a book you haven't read before), and more likely only once or twice at most if at all. But let's say there would be five responses to it in the book.