It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ILovePeace
You may be able to join freely, regardless of background to some groups but this is again part of the charade. The idea is to leave it open to everyone and then pick the ones of ideal mindset who will truly advance. You may very well be 'a mason' and a good person trying to better yourself but there are ALOT of people who use these fraternities to advance personal and global agendas.
Originally posted by Magzoid
If freemasonry "makes good men better" then it makes "bad men" what?
Originally posted by SecretSky
How are 'bad' men expelled? Are they voted out by the lodge members?
Originally posted by ILovePeace
Come on, you dont need to be part of a club to be a good human being that strives to better him or herself and the community around them.
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. -Margaret Mead
Originally posted by SecretSky
OK, I have another question - just out of curiosity again.
Lessons are taught and learned via ceremony, and presumably some form of moral tale to go with it.
Is the tale taught as fact?
Originally posted by Nobama
reply to post by SecretSky
They sacrifice him for the better good of the lodge of course.
Originally posted by raiders247
Heres my opinion from what I have found out:
Lower ranking free-masons usually get together for harmless fraternal activities and such, while the higher degree masons congregate in secrecy for World domination.
Originally posted by SecretSky
Why aren't women allowed? Is it simply tradition? And if so, is that tradition simply because at that time women were disqualified from most things? (voting/education etc.).
Are you happy that there are no women in your lodge?
Lessons are taught and learned via ceremony, and presumably some form of moral tale to go with it.
Is the tale taught as fact? Or is it open to interpretation? (Story and tale sound somehow patronizing, but I can't find a better word!)
I'm curious - as there seems to be a lot of mentioning of the journey/experience being more important than the final moment of obtaining the knowledge.