It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Threat claim Nuclear Bombs Hidden All over US?
page: 9share:
This is B.S. This story was leaked out to curb any backlash at implementing more control laws. There is no way they could get that many nukes in this
country with out our own government knowing. So "IF" this were true then our government is bringing them in period.
Originally posted by JerryB08
I guess I'm gullible. But I don't beleive our government did anything like that in 9/11 and I'm not so sure they intended on this even getting out. I can't find a single second source anywhere in the MSM. What good would come from telling the American people. Would just cause panic.
Are you a paid government agent? Hi! Wazzup!
You watch pro football or pro baseball?
I like the Cowboys.
reply to post by dudly
I think this is yet and other ploy to go to war again or start a new one. Just like they did on 9/11. They need a catalist to have peoples aprovals. So with the Japan nuclear thing why not fake a nuclear threat. People will be more suseptable to this kind of thing in trying times.
I think this is yet and other ploy to go to war again or start a new one. Just like they did on 9/11. They need a catalist to have peoples aprovals. So with the Japan nuclear thing why not fake a nuclear threat. People will be more suseptable to this kind of thing in trying times.
I didn't read the whole thread to be honest because frankly the weapon has already been used...
Ok, the nukes aren't real, never were, never will be but the intended use "FEAR" has been successful, that's the main principal behind "terrorism" hense the name.
Just the inconvenience, the fear, the resources used to debunk this is enough for it to be called a successful attack.
Don't let "them" win, to be fearful means they have won.
Ok, the nukes aren't real, never were, never will be but the intended use "FEAR" has been successful, that's the main principal behind "terrorism" hense the name.
Just the inconvenience, the fear, the resources used to debunk this is enough for it to be called a successful attack.
Don't let "them" win, to be fearful means they have won.
Anyone remember when those 6 Nukes were on a plane from some AFB in North or South Dakota that was flying around the US for several hours? i wonder
where those nuked ended up at.Hmmmm
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman
No I'm not a paid agent although I wish I could get in. I hear they even have pet insurance! I just don't think any sane American believes that their own government would organize such a thing on their own people. Is our government corrupt and self providing? Oh sure they are. Have been since the founding fathers But would they mass murder their own people. No not in my opinion. For one there would be way too many people that would have to be involved. on your other questions I wasn't aware they even still played baseball. And I am a football fan and like the Steelers. When they can hold on to the ball.
No I'm not a paid agent although I wish I could get in. I hear they even have pet insurance! I just don't think any sane American believes that their own government would organize such a thing on their own people. Is our government corrupt and self providing? Oh sure they are. Have been since the founding fathers But would they mass murder their own people. No not in my opinion. For one there would be way too many people that would have to be involved. on your other questions I wasn't aware they even still played baseball. And I am a football fan and like the Steelers. When they can hold on to the ball.
reply to post by JerryB08
Well, I am a sane American and I think 911 was an inside job.
And from what I understood, only 5 nukes were delivered to Louisiana. There was a big disinfornation campaign on this subject, but clearly something disappeared in transit.
Well, I am a sane American and I think 911 was an inside job.
And from what I understood, only 5 nukes were delivered to Louisiana. There was a big disinfornation campaign on this subject, but clearly something disappeared in transit.
reply to post by SunnyDee
It's just my opinion. I'm open minded I like to think. I personally just don't buy in to that one. I also read they were "live" and they were not supposed to be armed. That was the reason of the article. I don't remember one missing but it wouldn't surprise me.
It's just my opinion. I'm open minded I like to think. I personally just don't buy in to that one. I also read they were "live" and they were not supposed to be armed. That was the reason of the article. I don't remember one missing but it wouldn't surprise me.
Originally posted by JerryB08
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman
No I'm not a paid agent although I wish I could get in. I hear they even have pet insurance! I just don't think any sane American believes that their own government would organize such a thing on their own people. Is our government corrupt and self providing? Oh sure they are. Have been since the founding fathers But would they mass murder their own people. No not in my opinion. For one there would be way too many people that would have to be involved. on your other questions I wasn't aware they even still played baseball. And I am a football fan and like the Steelers. When they can hold on to the ball.
Green bay took care of your overrated a---es.
Can these threats be political false flag?
Scare people away from alternative fuel.
maybe they are planning a Japan disaster here.
edit on 31-3-2011 by John_Rodger_Cornman because: (no reason given)
Have you heard of psychological warfare? This is probably a ploy by some terrorist organizations to put the fear of God in Americans. And most
Americans get into panic mode at the drop of a hat!
However, IF a "dirty bomb" could be exploded by terrorists, it would not be a 'nuclear' bomb, but an ordinary explosive device, loaded with radioactive waste such as is found in spent fuel from a nuclear reactor. It would NOT have an affect like a Hiroshima type bomb, for chrissake!
But such radioactivity can contaminate the location where the bomb explodes, to a range of perhaps a hundred feet or a few hundred feet. Coming close to such radioactivity is not likely to kill or seriously harm anyone. However, the contamination would need to be cleaned up fast. Failing to do so could create a long term health hazard.
America ain't going to be blown to smithereens any time soon! At least not before the Sun becomes a red giant!
So banish such thoughts! Or you'd be playing into the hands of those bozos! For them, fear is the key!
Don't worry, be happy! Have a nice day!
However, IF a "dirty bomb" could be exploded by terrorists, it would not be a 'nuclear' bomb, but an ordinary explosive device, loaded with radioactive waste such as is found in spent fuel from a nuclear reactor. It would NOT have an affect like a Hiroshima type bomb, for chrissake!
But such radioactivity can contaminate the location where the bomb explodes, to a range of perhaps a hundred feet or a few hundred feet. Coming close to such radioactivity is not likely to kill or seriously harm anyone. However, the contamination would need to be cleaned up fast. Failing to do so could create a long term health hazard.
America ain't going to be blown to smithereens any time soon! At least not before the Sun becomes a red giant!
So banish such thoughts! Or you'd be playing into the hands of those bozos! For them, fear is the key!
Don't worry, be happy! Have a nice day!
edit on 31-3-2011 by OrionHunterX because: (no reason given)
Probably unrelated but the MSM is picking up a story about a letter blowing up at a Swiss Nuclear Group Office and injured 2 people. Something smells
fishy....
www.cnn.com...
www.cnn.com...
edit on 31-3-2011 by concernedcitizen519 because: provided
link
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman
Sure it could be a false flag. But you would think it would be all over the media. You would also think that our government would know few people would believe that terrorists could get a hold of the materials for that many weapons.
The Green Bay Packers are the champs however The Steelers beat themselves. You can beat any NFL football team with the negative turn over ratio they had. But that's football. I recall Seattle giving us a ring a few years back.
Sure it could be a false flag. But you would think it would be all over the media. You would also think that our government would know few people would believe that terrorists could get a hold of the materials for that many weapons.
The Green Bay Packers are the champs however The Steelers beat themselves. You can beat any NFL football team with the negative turn over ratio they had. But that's football. I recall Seattle giving us a ring a few years back.
One of the things that don't add up to me is why they would be sent to just regular people. One was to a private investigator. Why not to the news
outlets? And why Chicago? Are we supposed to think they crossed the great lakes from Canada. It said they were all post marked in Chicago. Why isn't
the other media outlets all over this? Was it accidentally leaked? And If so why would they leave the article up on their site?
Someone Posted this in another thread I thought It was VERY intresting.
Domestic military of 20,000 planned by 2011
By Spencer S. Hsu and Ann Scott Tyson
The Washington Post
Posted: 12/01/2008 12:30:00 AM MST
Updated: 12/01/2008 12:34:27 AM MST
WASHINGTON — The U.S. military expects to have 20,000 uniformed troops inside the United States by 2011 trained to help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe, according to Pentagon officials.
The long-planned shift in the Defense Department's role in homeland security was recently backed with funding and troop commitments after years of prodding by Congress and outside experts, defense analysts said.
There are critics of the change, in the military and among civil-liberties groups and libertarians who express concern that the new homeland emphasis threatens to strain the military and possibly undermine the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old federal law restricting the military's role in domestic law enforcement.
But the Bush administration and some in Congress have pushed for a heightened homeland military role since the middle of this decade, saying the greatest domestic threat is terrorists exploiting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, dedicating 20,000 troops to domestic response — a nearly sevenfold increase in five years — "would have been extraordinary to the point of unbelievable," Paul McHale, assistant defense secretary for homeland defense, said in remarks last month at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. But the realization that civilian authorities may be overwhelmed in a catastrophe prompted "a fundamental change in military culture," he said.
The Pentagon's plan calls for three rapid-reaction forces to be ready for emergency response by September 2011. The first 4,700-person unit, built around an active-duty combat brigade based at Fort Stewart, Ga., was available as of Oct. 1, said Gen. Victor Renuart, commander of the U.S. Northern Command.
Read more: Domestic military of 20,000 planned by 2011 - The Denver Post www.denverpost.com...
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: www.denverpost.com...
Domestic military of 20,000 planned by 2011
By Spencer S. Hsu and Ann Scott Tyson
The Washington Post
Posted: 12/01/2008 12:30:00 AM MST
Updated: 12/01/2008 12:34:27 AM MST
WASHINGTON — The U.S. military expects to have 20,000 uniformed troops inside the United States by 2011 trained to help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe, according to Pentagon officials.
The long-planned shift in the Defense Department's role in homeland security was recently backed with funding and troop commitments after years of prodding by Congress and outside experts, defense analysts said.
There are critics of the change, in the military and among civil-liberties groups and libertarians who express concern that the new homeland emphasis threatens to strain the military and possibly undermine the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old federal law restricting the military's role in domestic law enforcement.
But the Bush administration and some in Congress have pushed for a heightened homeland military role since the middle of this decade, saying the greatest domestic threat is terrorists exploiting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, dedicating 20,000 troops to domestic response — a nearly sevenfold increase in five years — "would have been extraordinary to the point of unbelievable," Paul McHale, assistant defense secretary for homeland defense, said in remarks last month at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. But the realization that civilian authorities may be overwhelmed in a catastrophe prompted "a fundamental change in military culture," he said.
The Pentagon's plan calls for three rapid-reaction forces to be ready for emergency response by September 2011. The first 4,700-person unit, built around an active-duty combat brigade based at Fort Stewart, Ga., was available as of Oct. 1, said Gen. Victor Renuart, commander of the U.S. Northern Command.
Read more: Domestic military of 20,000 planned by 2011 - The Denver Post www.denverpost.com...
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: www.denverpost.com...
Domestic military of 20,000 planned by 2011
By Spencer S. Hsu and Ann Scott Tyson
The Washington Post
Posted: 12/01/2008 12:30:00 AM MST
Updated: 12/01/2008 12:34:27 AM MST
WASHINGTON — The U.S. military expects to have 20,000 uniformed troops inside the United States by 2011 trained to help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe, according to Pentagon officials.
The long-planned shift in the Defense Department's role in homeland security was recently backed with funding and troop commitments after years of prodding by Congress and outside experts, defense analysts said.
There are critics of the change, in the military and among civil-liberties groups and libertarians who express concern that the new homeland emphasis threatens to strain the military and possibly undermine the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old federal law restricting the military's role in domestic law enforcement.
But the Bush administration and some in Congress have pushed for a heightened homeland military role since the middle of this decade, saying the greatest domestic threat is terrorists exploiting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, dedicating 20,000 troops to domestic response — a nearly sevenfold increase in five years — "would have been extraordinary to the point of unbelievable," Paul McHale, assistant defense secretary for homeland defense, said in remarks last month at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. But the realization that civilian authorities may be overwhelmed in a catastrophe prompted "a fundamental change in military culture," he said.
The Pentagon's plan calls for three rapid-reaction forces to be ready for emergency response by September 2011. The first 4,700-person unit, built around an active-duty combat brigade based at Fort Stewart, Ga., was available as of Oct. 1, said Gen. Victor Renuart, commander of the U.S. Northern Command.
Read more: Domestic military of 20,000 planned by 2011 - The Denver Post www.denverpost.com...
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: www.denverpost.com...
Domestic military of 20,000 planned by 2011
By Spencer S. Hsu and Ann Scott Tyson
The Washington Post
Posted: 12/01/2008 12:30:00 AM MST
Updated: 12/01/2008 12:34:27 AM MST
WASHINGTON — The U.S. military expects to have 20,000 uniformed troops inside the United States by 2011 trained to help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe, according to Pentagon officials.
The long-planned shift in the Defense Department's role in homeland security was recently backed with funding and troop commitments after years of prodding by Congress and outside experts, defense analysts said.
There are critics of the change, in the military and among civil-liberties groups and libertarians who express concern that the new homeland emphasis threatens to strain the military and possibly undermine the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old federal law restricting the military's role in domestic law enforcement.
But the Bush administration and some in Congress have pushed for a heightened homeland military role since the middle of this decade, saying the greatest domestic threat is terrorists exploiting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, dedicating 20,000 troops to domestic response — a nearly sevenfold increase in five years — "would have been extraordinary to the point of unbelievable," Paul McHale, assistant defense secretary for homeland defense, said in remarks last month at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. But the realization that civilian authorities may be overwhelmed in a catastrophe prompted "a fundamental change in military culture," he said.
The Pentagon's plan calls for three rapid-reaction forces to be ready for emergency response by September 2011. The first 4,700-person unit, built around an active-duty combat brigade based at Fort Stewart, Ga., was available as of Oct. 1, said Gen. Victor Renuart, commander of the U.S. Northern Command.
Read more: Domestic military of 20,000 planned by 2011 - The Denver Post www.denverpost.com...
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: www.denverpost.com...
That s the link where the entire article may be read. It's from 2008. That is in addition to our national guard and DHS
www.denverpost.com...
www.denverpost.com...
What is interesting to me is that if this is a false flag opperation, obviously 160 nukes hidden across the U.S. would need to be a inside job. There
is no other way possible for that amount of nuclear energy to be hidden without extrodinary help. The letters i hope are just a hoax/scare tactic.
Has anyone found any other news source that has picked up this story? I cannot seem to find anything else about the letters anywhere.
I just found this clip on youtube it it hasnt been posted yet.
www.youtube.com...
Has anyone found any other news source that has picked up this story? I cannot seem to find anything else about the letters anywhere.
I just found this clip on youtube it it hasnt been posted yet.
www.youtube.com...
edit on 31-3-2011 by dudly because: link added
reply to post by Protostellar
that's the big give away, lost what credibility they had at that point, doesn't make any sense
that's the big give away, lost what credibility they had at that point, doesn't make any sense
new topics
-
Federal law trumps state and local law every time
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 9 hours ago
top topics
-
Federal law trumps state and local law every time
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 9 hours ago, 16 flags
active topics
-
Well, here we go red lines crossed Biden gives the go ahead to use long range missiles
World War Three • 390 • : Freeborn -
Anyone like the Scorpions?
Music • 21 • : belkide -
Federal law trumps state and local law every time
Social Issues and Civil Unrest • 26 • : tamusan -
Comcast dumping MSNBC
Mainstream News • 36 • : Kaiju666 -
Post A Funny (T&C Friendly) Pic Part IV: The LOL awakens!
General Chit Chat • 7831 • : DBCowboy -
DOJ Special Counsel Robert HUR Says JOE BIDEN Can Be ARRESTED After Jan 20th 2025.
Above Politics • 25 • : Kaiju666 -
-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- ---TIME TO SHOW THE WORLD--- -Part- --44--
Dissecting Disinformation • 3380 • : RelSciHistItSufi -
Remember These Attacks When President Trump 2.0 Retribution-Justice Commences.
2024 Elections • 94 • : xuenchen -
I thought Trump was the existential threat?
World War Three • 77 • : EyeoftheHurricane -
The Acronym Game .. Pt.4
General Chit Chat • 993 • : JJproductions