It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ambient Sound
Then are you saying he should not have gone and talked to the Urban League? What would people say about that? They would bash him for not going just like with the NAACP.
Like I said. Double Standard. Can't have it both ways.
Originally posted by Ambient Sound
So, like I said, no matter what he did at this point, if he did or didn't go, you would still be bashing him.
So, did the Urban League invite him to speak 9 months ago? How about the NAACP? How long were those invitations hanging out there? I don't know. Do you?
Originally posted by J0HNSmith
Yes, no matter what he did at this point he would get slammed because it's to late. Do you think in the last 4 years part of his job might have been helping out minorities that are in this country? He did a good job helping ILLEGAL MEXICANS get drivers licenses. He doesn't' need to be invited to a NAACP to UL meeting to do something for americans, he's the president it's his job to do it.
Are you saying that you think this is a sincere effort to improve the African American community and has nothing to do with a election year? Given his track record on false election promises and the timing I hope you are smarter than how you are sounding. Come on he's basically saying vote for me and here's what I will give you, why not just start handing out cash to black people, wait this works better because if he's reelected he doesn't have to give them squat.
Originally posted by CherokeeLeader
Never forget Lincoln was a Republican.
es.
As for those Americans with African ancestery, what exactly should he be doing for them that he shouldn't be doing for every American? The entire idea of a political group whose membership is based on race is offensive anyway and I applaud him for not going to the NAACP as I believe they are race card pimps and class warfare whores.
Originally posted by Ambient Sound
In other words, you are going to bash Bush no matter what he does or when.
Originally posted by Seth BullockAnd, JohnSmith, 'just start handing out cash to black people" is Kerry's platform, not Bush's.
[edit on 7/23/04 by Seth Bullock]
Originally posted by Ambient Sound
Originally posted by J0HNSmith
Are you saying that you think this is a sincere effort to improve the African American community and has nothing to do with a election year? Given his track record on false election promises and the timing I hope you are smarter than how you are sounding.
As for those Americans with African ancestery, what exactly should he be doing for them that he shouldn't be doing for every American?
Originally posted by marg6043
Well Muaddib,
Knowing your by your post for some time I have to say that not matter what I say you have your mind work out.
Yesterday we noted that John Kerry had claimed, in a Columbus, Ohio, speech, that more black Americans are in prison than in college. It turns out that KERRY LIED!!!! Blogger Clyde Middleton has the numbers (links below in PDF):
The US [Department of Justice] tells us the number of blacks incarcerated at mid-year 2002 (page 11, Table 13): 818,900 black men; 65,600 black women; total 884,500 blacks.
The US Census Bureau tells us the number of blacks in college during 2002: 802,000 black men; 1,476,000 black women; total 2,278,000 blacks.
Originally posted by curme
[...]Want to see what the military thinks of Bush? Just read through any issue of Army Times.
Originally posted by marg6043
And for bush lies here is a link with days in wish he has turn his back after promising things.
www.house.gov...
No body in this forums are lying about bush lies to the nation.
Originally posted by Majic
Originally posted by curme
[...]Want to see what the military thinks of Bush? Just read through any issue of Army Times.
The Army Times Publishing Company is owned by the Gannett Company, which also owns USA Today and dozens of "local" newspapers, none of which maintain a neutral editorial position.
It no more represents the opinions of members of the Army than the New York Times represents the opinions of the people of New York. It does not and should not ever be considered an authority on "what the military thinks of Bush". That is for military members to decide on their own.
Just as Americans have differing political opinions, so do members of the armed services. To suggest otherwise is to suggest a falsehood.