It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JustSomeIdiot
Originally posted by rapunzel222
reply to post by AwareOfSurroundings
life's pretty weird - you'll adjust to it i reckon.
its actually kind of cool that a spaceship could be that big.
it probably was originally a natural body that was hollowed out by aliens.
there are giant 'mascons' below its surface that distort the gravity when you fly around it. Leftovers from the hollowing out phase/equipment?
it IS almost hollow acc to Nasa as they did tests by dropping things on it and it rang 'like a bell'.
the problem wiht that is that natural bodies aren't hollow.....
What have you been smoking? Can you share some?
Really, NASA said the moon is hollow and rang like a bell. Uh, no they did not. And no it is not. Seriously, do you believe this crap?
Originally posted by Xterrain
That being said, you're wrong that the moon wasn't there 6000 years ago...in Incan culture, there were two moons in their times. Look into Teahuanaco...literally means, 'city of the doomed moon' and was destroyed by a lunar collision some 12,000-17,000 years ago.
edit on 30-3-2011 by AwareOfSurroundings because: Post the whole thing as quote. Didn't meant to.
Originally posted by AwareOfSurroundings
Your absolutely right. Also, the moon is OLDER then the EARTH. The Mayans also clearly saw the moon and spoke of it.
If the moon is older then the Earth, then the moon could not of been here when the Big Bang Theory happened because wouldn't it of been knocked from its position? Seems so perfectly precise. Everyone knows that NASA says that the moon is hollow. How would that be possible if it were a "natural" celestial body. Celestial bodies are not hollow.
Originally posted by realanswers
There is no record of the Moon in ancient civilization dating over 6,000 years ago because it wasn't here at that time.
Astronomers and Egyptologists have searched hard for ancient Egyptian eclipse records without any success.
www.eclipse-chasers.com...
www.touregypt.net...
Their interpretation of the Moon being the round object always laying in a boat/banana shaped object is a joke. They don't know what they're talking about.
The Moon was NOT here over 6,000 years ago period!
www.youtube.com...edit on 29-3-2011 by realanswers because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by realanswers
There is no record of the Moon in ancient civilization dating over 6,000 years ago because it wasn't here at that time.
Astronomers and Egyptologists have searched hard for ancient Egyptian eclipse records without any success.
www.eclipse-chasers.com...
www.touregypt.net...
Their interpretation of the Moon being the round object always laying in a boat/banana shaped object is a joke. They don't know what they're talking about.
The Moon was NOT here over 6,000 years ago period!
www.youtube.com...edit on 29-3-2011 by realanswers because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AwareOfSurroundings
Your absolutely right. Also, the moon is OLDER then the EARTH. The Mayans also clearly saw the moon and spoke of it.
If the moon is older then the Earth, then the moon could not of been here when the Big Bang Theory happened because wouldn't it of been knocked from its position? Seems so perfectly precise. Everyone knows that NASA says that the moon is hollow. How would that be possible if it were a "natural" celestial body. Celestial bodies are not hollow.
edit on 30-3-2011 by AwareOfSurroundings because: Post the whole thing as quote. Didn't meant to.
Originally posted by hp1229
This reminds me of a thread by 'Kid-Cudi' ...'Dolphins and Whales caused japan earthquake'
Although I have to admit had a great time reading and laughing my butt off. I can definitely use much needed humor to cheer me up and prevent a heart attack from depression and stress