majority of ATS "debunkers" have no Avatars..??

reply to post by gmac10001


It's still not trolling. Yes, he could have given more information, but it's not required. I too think it's lens flare. My reasoning is, it looks like lens flare, and there is no second sun.

reply to post by snowspirit


I wish I had thought to say that

reply to post by Rossa


You are taking this all wrong just cause you dont have an avatar doesnt mean your a dis informationist not at all what im saying.

Maybe skeptics don't believe avatars are real. You can't believe everything you see on the internet. If avatars are real, why doesn't one just land on the White House lawn? Yeah, my avatar has a birth certificate, but you're not allowed to see it. Nor are you allowed to know where he gets his funding.

OP, maybe not everyone is as technologically savvy as you are. i've tried to put up an avatar, but evidently another ATS site hosts the photos, then you has to manipulate the image over to here (ATS), which is where i get lost on the sauce.

-- But -- i have noticed, as i'm a short timer myself, how many posts are nothing more than Johnny Come Lately troll bait. this site seems to be a troll magnet, but it's understandable. ATS has more National Enquirer trash topics than any other site i've seen. with all that natural lure is a very strange appeal.

There are changes on other large popular sites as well. Aside from the trolls, it feels like there are ears and eyes on all over the place.

See, I have an avatar. It's a black picture surrounded by a black frame.
Second line.

reply to post by LadySkadi


lol I made two of those lists. Guess I must have peed in his Wheaties more than once

reply to post by whatukno


Lol... yep. Lots of cool kats made it.

reply to post by LadySkadi


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/aad5844c7e2c.jpg[/atsimg]

Here are a couple more terror-o-bloggers that have been added.

LadySkadi

~Lucidity

WTF!! BenevolentHeretic!! NOOo!!!!

say it aint so!!!!


OP
it seems to me that trolls like attention, not having an avatar is like not having a face/personality. a troll would want an in your face/offensive avatar methinks.

DISCLAIMER- the above do not apply to the technically challenged unable to upload

on the other hand i've seen post [including one liners] that were gems of wisdom perhaps the category of Sacred-Fool would apply to these

Let's keep the discussion generic, folks.

Discussion of individual members is not allowed.

TIA

I am thinking of changing my avatar.

I just want to fit in....

I have 545 posts, 2 have been removed, they are both in this thread, mentioning a certain member with a John Lithgow avatar.
He has an AVATAR, which is on post topic. I see what's going on. It's not about members without Avatars, it's about specific members you particularly protect. Remove this post too to solidify my point and expose your "friend", that's fine, tells a story. ON TOPIC POST here.

I still don't know why people care about the debunkers. You know that isn't the best form of disinfo right? Anyone with kids knows that reverse psychology is the only way to go.

reply to post by LadySkadi


All the people I've pissed off over the years and I'm not on the list...

Bit disappointed really

reply to post by JibbyJedi


You got it wrong.

You are singling out specific members.

BIG difference to what the OP is trying to say.

there are two main reasons why this is ....


1) their very new to the site

and 2) their just to lazy to upload a avatar....

Originally posted by alysha.angel
there are two main reasons why this is ....


1) their very new to the site

and 2) their just to lazy to upload a avatar....

I debunk this.

And I have an avatar.

Originally posted by Advantage

Originally posted by alysha.angel
there are two main reasons why this is ....


1) their very new to the site

and 2) their just to lazy to upload a avatar....

I debunk this.

And I have an avatar.

girl you know what i mean....