Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to C

Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court
89.5% of German respondents do not believe the official story of 9/11.

www.globalresearch.ca...

I bet my reputation that the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit throws the case out.

Do you all really believe that our corrupt government will allow this kind of information to be heard or to get out to the public? It will never happen.

I can bet that the Obama administration will put pressure on the Circuit Court Judge and force them to throw out the case, claiming it is a National Security Risk. April 5th is just around the corner I will be watching but I already know the outcome before it is heard.

If this case is not allowed to be heard this will confirm to me that the legal system is just as corrupt as our government and they are also helping these treasonous officials in covering up their false flag.

If I thought for one minute I was wrong I wouldn’t have wasted my time in making a complete fool out of myself. This case will never be allowed to be heard in any court of law. It is to damaging and the evidence will prove our government and their reports are lies.
If this case was to be tried the outcome will be devastating to the Bush and Obama administration. The American people will demand accountability if top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop wins her case.

What are your thoughts?

Originally posted by impressme
If I thought for one minute I was wrong I wouldn’t have wasted my time in making a complete fool out of myself.

You are wrong, who is the "career army officer" and what rank do they hold?

You never even bothered to do a search, this has been posted before!

reply to post by dereks

You are wrong, who is the "career army officer" and what rank do they hold?

You never even bothered to do a search, this has been posted before!

This is not about research this is about a court case you did not read the given sources as most of you debunkers never do as you just demonstrated it.

It doesn’t matter if April G is a common house wife, it is the evidence that counts not what you are.

Originally posted by dereks

Originally posted by impressme
If I thought for one minute I was wrong I wouldn’t have wasted my time in making a complete fool out of myself.

You are wrong, who is the "career army officer" and what rank do they hold?

You never even bothered to do a search, this has been posted before!

Does it really matter and did you even read the link in the 2 minutes it took you to post?

As usual, you add NOTHING to the debate..
Must be one of the lower paid ones..

Originally posted by impressme
This is not about research

You have once again shown you have huge trouble reading and comprehending posts, where did I mention research?

And how can the court case be about April, as she is NOT a career army officer?

IMHO
the lack of jurisprudence is a dead give away.
when the taliban asked for proof ( and we will hand over OBL)
what did they get?

whatever it was...
it was NOT proof

"No independent court has applied legal procedures to review the available evidence on who was responsible for the attacks."

-from the OP link
since jurisprudence is one of the cornerstones of an honest society
bs walks

reply to post by dereks

You are wrong, who is the "career army officer" and what rank do they hold?

The fact is you have a huge trouble reading and comprehending given source, how dose that work for you? Stick to the topic.

well its about time anyway. why dont all these people with money start suing the pants off these criminals? i hear of plenty of actors and artists that want to be philanthropists so heres your chance! sue em! i would if i had the money

OBAMA
is the highest payout to bankers per contribution of any president
if you expect "right" from "bought"
well
heh heh
YOU will get what YOU paid for
more gitmo
only
for patriots

PS the rebels in Libya are Al CIA DUH
obama might do right by them

reply to post by Danbones


just because your a rebel doesnt mean you rebel against the right thing

There is no such rank as Top Secret Military Specialist.

An infant would not get or need a security clearance.

I understand some people questioning what really happened and want to see some people held accountable, I really do. But the headline says career army officer. There isn't one, there possibly is a specialist who is just an e4. Thats an automatic rank that one recieves in about 2 years in the military. Theres nothing career about that rank.

It also says the infant recieved a security clearance. Does anyone actually believe an infant would recieve a security clearance? I mean really, an infant cant even talk or write, what is he/she going to tell?

I understand the need for questioning and holding those responsible accountable, but this story is obviously not real. Even the headline isn't true. If it is then who is the officer and why is the story about a specialist? Why lie about an infant recieving a security clearance?

Since those two questions are about the article I think they are relevant and deserve an answer.

lol if you lose hope your not a threat cuz you wont fight

Watch and see what I am talking about the court will throw this case out on April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m. there will never be an opening statement. Due to National Security reasons, we cannot listen to this case, is what I expect to hear.

Originally posted by impressme
Watch and see what I am talking about the court will throw this case out on April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m

It will be thrown out as there is no substance to it! Remember the judge said "He said that the allegations are frivolous and based on fantasy and delusion"

reply to post by Becoming

I understand the need for questioning and holding those responsible accountable, but this story is obviously not real. Even the headline isn't true. If it is then who is the officer and why is the story about a specialist? Why lie about an infant recieving a security clearance?

I see your goal here is to discredit the plaintive.

This article is about the:

On April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut, the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.

Is this not true?

Originally posted by impressme
Watch and see what I am talking about the court will throw this case out on April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m. there will never be an opening statement. Due to National Security reasons, we cannot listen to this case, is what I expect to hear.

You're right.

Didn't this individual have to I don't know what it's called; ask for permission to bring up allegations to be heard given the ranking officials---some kind of diplomatic immunity? I didn't know I could slur with a keyboard

This person will be an example to anyone else wanting to prosecute a "diplomatic Official." The Judge will give her a wicked little tongue-lashing, then like Santa- he'll put his boot in her face and push her on down the slide...

providing she makes it to court.

reply to post by dereks

It will be thrown out as there is no substance to it! Remember the judge said "He said that the allegations are frivolous and based on fantasy and delusion"

And that just made your day didn’t it?

The fact is, it is not being heard by the same Judge and in a different court. Perhaps you believe the families who lost their love ones on 911 do not deserve real closers for their unanswered questions about 911.

The fact is the OS that you obsessively defend, is based on fantasy and delusion.

Originally posted by impressme
The fact is, it is not being heard by the same Judge and in a different court.

That does not change the fact the claim is based on fantasy and delusion, just like all truthers silly claims.

What is the flavour of the month now for truthers?
mini nukes?
beam weapons?
holographic aircraft?
controlled demolition
paint on nanoo nanoo thermite?
hushaboom explosives
missiles not planes
no planes
radio controlled planes

All very silly claims made by the truth movement