It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PlanetXGuy
Hi caf:
Originally posted by caf1550i honestly still want someone to tell me WHY wasn't civilization destroyed time and time again when this thing was suppose to pass us because if your crack pot theories are correct this isn't the first time it would have passed earth when there were humans on it.
The dwarf star orbits the Sun once every 3600 years, but this particular year this 'event' includes a summer perigee (9/11/2011) and subsequent alignment (9/26/2011), when Earth and dwarf star are only .396 AU apart. If this event took place six months earlier or later, the Earth would be on the far side of the sun and 1.614 AU away from the dwarf star and no pole shift could possibly take place. Everyone assumes the Earth is in the same position to suffer the same catastrophic terraforming events every 3600 years and that is simply not true. Then you assume the world will end in 2011 with even with Earth at the wrong place at the wrong time, but that is also not true. People are being warned so you can prepare (link) through threat assessment, contingency planning and execution of those survival strategies. My descriptions include the worst-case scenario including a geological pole shift, which I hope does not happen; but I can also see how that kind of event is in the cards should this dwarf star be MASSIVE and directly between Sun and Earth at the September 26, 2011 conjunction.
Originally posted by caf1550ive asked this question and Planet X-guy told me to ask a question about the OP but he never debunked what i asked he just cited BS youtube videos that have no merit for anything scientific
First of all, this OP is posted here to solicit advocating and opposing 'supported arguments' based upon the evidence. I am looking for link-filled rebuttals and counterproposals explaining why Greenland had sunrise two days early and why Earth experienced aquifers shifts and Earth axis shifts and major Quakes in Chile and Japan on February 27, 2010 and March 11, 2011 other than our planet passing through the gravity trough connecting our Sun to an approaching DWARF STAR. Does caf have anything like that? The fact that I can propose a theory does not make me any expert on this topic. In fact, before February 1, 2011 I never heard of any dwarf star and could not care less about 2012 and any of this stuff at all. I was led to this investigation by the discovery of this ELEnin Comet that seems to have more disinformation out there than information.
Originally posted by caf1550i could make a youtube video saying that purple people eaters are going to invade us in 2012 or late 2011 and if i made sure it made sense and showed some BS stuff like the so-called "pictures" from the SPT then i could make it make sense
If all caf can do is whine and cry like the too-many trolls, shills and idiots around here, then I will skip by your posts too. You guys should realize that other Boards do not even allow me to post links to this ATS Board, because this place has a terrible reputation even among admins of other conspiracy sites. Youtube is just another medium through which people exchange ideas that has become an alternative News resource for many people running away from the corrupt major media outlets. The fact that a news story appears on youtube or anywhere else does not automatically mean true of false. This is an ongoing investigation and we are simply looking for the truth about this ELEnin Comet or an inbound dwarf star that appears to be affecting our entire solar system, the Sun and Earth.
Originally posted by caf15501. THE SPT doesn't take pictures because its a RADIO TELESCOPE why can't you get that through your thick skulls?
Gather your evidence to support a 2011/2012 theory and post that in this ATS Forum, so others can come behind and agree or disagree and cry about your thick skull. Maybe you will want to offer a reply and maybe not. With ten other Boards to visit, God knows I have read enough from you.
Originally posted by PlanetXGuy
Gather your evidence to support a 2011/2012 theory and post that in this ATS Forum, so others can come behind and agree or disagree and cry about your thick skull. Maybe you will want to offer a reply and maybe not. With ten other Boards to visit, God knows I have read enough from you.
Originally posted by Signals
E L E N I N =
E xtinction
L evel
E vent
N ibiru
I s
N ear
Originally posted by NyxOneDo explain why Halley didn't obliterate us.
Please tell why Hale-Bopp didn't annihilate us. Say why McNaught didn't outright destroy us. Do explain why the planets are not being torn out of their orbits, as that is something a brown dwarf would do.
Originally posted by NyxOneDo explain why you keep ignoring past examples of earthquakes just as strong or even stronger than the recent examples, and why you keep ignoring the fact that the Ring of Fire is extremely volatile.
Originally posted by NyxOneElenin has also 'aligned' with us before. Don't see any disasters there.
Originally posted by NyxOneAnd on the subject of disasters, do explain why the planetary alignment in 2000 didn't wipe out all life as we know it.
Originally posted by NyxOneI know you'll answer none of these questions because you're faced with someone who can actually argue.
First of all, this OP is posted here to solicit advocating and opposing 'supported arguments' based upon the evidence. I am looking for link-filled rebuttals and counterproposals explaining why Greenland had sunrise two days early...
First, let’s get rid of all the crackpot theories. Earth’s rotational axis has not changed. Astronomers use telescopes every night and measure the positions of stars down to tenths of an arc second (or finer) resolution every night. If something had happened like that, everyone around here would be totally whigged out about now, yet calm prevails at observatories around the world. This is not related to the bird deaths, 2012 non-sense, magnetic pole shifting, etc.
The idea that is getting the most play and traction is that global warming is to blame...
However there are other explanations. Accuweather proposed an unusual concentration of methane in the atmosphere may have changed the index of refraction of the atmosphere at let the Sun be visible a couple of days early....
Much more likely is an atmospheric phenomena. A certain rare but understood shape of ice crystal (called a pyramidilly-terminated hexagonal prism for those following along at home) can produce a halo with a radius of 4 degrees. This halo would extend a little above the horizon giving the illusion of a sunrise.
Some scientists suggest that the sun rose early due to global warming, namely, Greenland's melting ice caps
Not a global phenomenon
While they disagreed on the cause of the town's early sunrise, experts did reach one consensus: This was an isolated event, not a sign of earlier spring around the Northern Hemisphere.
"In a nutshell, there can't be a change in the true sunrise, because that would require the Earth-Sun orbital parameters to change," said John Walsh, a professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Fairbanks is located about 1 degree of latitude south of the Arctic Circle, far enough south that it does not completely lose its sun in winter, and this year the sun has followed its typical pattern in Alaska, he said.
"No changes here," he said. "We would have heard about it."
Scientists claim to have discovered more evidence of global warming after the sun rose two days early in Greenland, apparently because melting glaciers have lowered the horizon.
1) Scientists are hypothesizing that glacier levels located nearby have dropped and allowed to the sun to be visible sooner.
2) Another hypothesis is that there is an unusual concentration of methane gas in the atmosphere. This would have caused sunlight to bend in a way that made the sun visible to the city two days early. This bending of light is particularly important when the sun is low on the horizon (ie. sunrise or sunset). The sun barely rises in Ilulissat for a few minutes currently, so it is obviously very low on the horizon.
It could just be an illusion, according to some scientists who believe the sun’s rays simply had a stronger bend than usual and thus made it appear to have risen earlier. Whatever happened, experts tell LiveScience it was an isolated event, not a sign of early spring for the entire hemisphere: “In a nutshell, there can't be a change in the true sunrise, because that would require the Earth-Sun orbital parameters to change,” says one professor.
...and why Earth experienced aquifers shifts and Earth axis shifts...
You guys should realize that other Boards do not even allow me to post links to this ATS Board, because this place has a terrible reputation even among admins of other conspiracy sites.
Originally posted by randyfulreply to post by PlanetXGuy
nice job your theory of passing through the gravitational pull makes perfect sense I would do the star thing and all but i am new haven't figured out all that yet more interested in peoples ideas
Try not to feed the trolls/shills/crybabies waving their arms around to create any distraction possible to throw you off track and just follow the evidence.
Originally posted by NyxOne
Originally posted by Signals
E L E N I N =
E xtinction
L evel
E vent
N ibiru
I s
N ear
Extra Large Extreme New Improved Nachos.
I can make completely irrelevant acronyms.
Learn how comets are named.edit on 3-4-2011 by NyxOne because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PlanetXGuy
Hi Randy:
Originally posted by randyfulreply to post by PlanetXGuy
nice job your theory of passing through the gravitational pull makes perfect sense I would do the star thing and all but i am new haven't figured out all that yet more interested in peoples ideas
The Dwarf Star Event Timeline has been modified (link) to include a Saturn/ELEnin/Sun alignment on July 7, 2011 where we might see evidence of ELEnin passing through the Saturn/Sun gravity trough (USMB post). I encourage everyone to run their own investigation to separate information from the mountain of disinformation that is out there. I am no astronomer and only a truth investigator searching for what is really going on here and your assistance is greatly appreciated. Try not to feed the trolls/shills/crybabies waving their arms around to create any distraction possible to throw you off track and just follow the evidence.
Originally posted by Signals
Originally posted by NyxOne
Originally posted by Signals
E L E N I N =
E xtinction
L evel
E vent
N ibiru
I s
N ear
Extra Large Extreme New Improved Nachos.
I can make completely irrelevant acronyms.
Learn how comets are named.edit on 3-4-2011 by NyxOne because: (no reason given)
Show me how the one I presented is irrelevant...
Originally posted by randyful
reply to post by NyxOne
I refer you to my earlier post about the lying public we know we are not told the whole truth on many events the problem is how do we get to the truth argueing amongst ourselves wont get us there we need to grow balls and argue with those in the know we all might get some real evidence and answers that way
With ten other Boards to visit, God knows I have read enough from you.