It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Scientific method refers to a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge.[1] To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning
Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, identifiable features distinguish scientific inquiry from other methods of obtaining knowledge. Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design experimental studies to test these hypotheses. These steps must be repeatable
Originally posted by Ghandi
I am not interested in proving it, I already know I will not be able to. That is why its called a theory.
And I have already stated that I am speculating. But you have not swayed either side, so you are more useless then the speculation itself.
Crazy They aren't OUR laws of physics, they are THE laws of physics.
Originally posted by autowrench
How can you say this?
Have you been to where Nibiru lies in space, and scientifically tested the laws of physics there?
going by Earth's laws of physics, and no one knows what these laws are, or how they may work in other sectors in the Universe.
The theory postulated by the OP is sound, but it is only a theory, after all
Originally posted by Ghandi
So your entire argument is that I have stated a hypothesis and not a theory.
Then I agree, by definition a hypothesis would fit better for the general population, however there are those that could call this a theory, should they choose to believe the facts presented and do not require additional information for they have already read enough that the "holes" can be overlooked in some cases.
This thread was made for "out of the box" thinkers.