Remote Viewing -never worked ,never will on Ats (and everywhere else on the WEB)

So i read a lot of remote viewing experiments during the last 2 years. And it never worked out. In a place like this there has to be at least one guy who is able to do that. There seems to be no one so lets be simple : it does not work. It does not exist. There is not one guy on this planet who can do anything else then just guessing and be lucky in some cases.
Why are u even trying if u know that u are just guessing.

reply to post by kauskau


Um, not sure where you have been studying this information, but there are actual tests that were done and documented that it does work. IE Government testing, and I believe even Edgar Cayce.

So are we in the internet, or on the internet.

See, thats the big question!

reply to post by ypperst


i was not in school when we learned that

reply to post by chiefsmom


so why did it never work here on ats? (did they hire all people that can do it? of course not..if its possible there got to be more people that can do that. Here are a lot of people..but did it work only once here?)

I recently came across a fascinating case where subjects were able to describe supposed artificial structures on Mars through remote viewing.

Here's a link to the study & below is a video summarising the results

I totally agree with you. Major Ed Dames has been talking smack for 15 years on C2C and ain't a damn thing ever came true. This killshot BS he has been saying is just getting old.

Remember when he got Art all hyped up about crying babies?



Babies cry every day.

Originally posted by Fazza!
I recently came across a fascinating case where subjects were able to describe a supposed artificial base on Mars through remote viewing.

Here's a link to the study carried out & below is a video summarising the results - thought you might find it interesting

edit on 25/3/2011 by Fazza! because: (no reason given)

Isn't this the same Courtney Brown that said there was a companion to comet Hale-Bopp? And then all those Religious fools killed themselves over it?

reply to post by Fazza!

I recently came across a fascinating case where subjects were able to describe a supposed artificial base on Mars through remote viewing.

I can make up a bunch of stuff on mars, oops, i meant remote view stuff on mars, myself. There are rare cases of remote viewing apparently working, I believe the Iran hostage crisis was a notable one.

Originally posted by kauskau
So i read a lot of remote viewing experiments during the last 2 years. And it never worked out. In a place like this there has to be at least one guy who is able to do that. There seems to be no one so lets be simple : it does not work. It does not exist. There is not one guy on this planet who can do anything else then just guessing and be lucky in some cases.
Why are u even trying if u know that u are just guessing.

edit on 25-3-2011 by kauskau because: (no reason given)

Well Mr Know-it-all & read-a-lot
How about doing SOME research on Ingo Swann, Harold Puthoff & SRI.

I wanted to link up some good articles about them here, but you seem to know it all already

reply to post by kauskau

 

There is not one guy on this planet who can do anything else then just guessing and be lucky in some cases.
Why are u even trying if u know that u are just guessing.

These RV experiments are just a bit of fun. Relax.

And sorry but we don't know enough about our universe to say something is impossible and/or can't happen.

reply to post by letmeDANz


my question is not if u can find people who say: We made experiments that worked...

my question is: why is no one HERE capable of doing that? This is a big community. So as there are certainly people here with all kinds of talents...why it never worked on ATS?

Going by your thread title alone:

Of course it's not gonna work on the web. It's a bunch of amateurs trying to be something they are not.

Prove to me that you have dreams. I'll be waiting for your proof. Just because your dim-witted view of science does not allow for it, does not mean it's not real. Science can only prove .00000000000000001% of all there is in this universe.

I should start a thread with the title: Black Holes-don't exist, never will on ATS (and everywhere else on the WEB)
Sounds silly doesn't it? Yet not one single shred of evidence proves it.

reply to post by Rising Against



of course we dont know enough about the universe. But we can know enough about our planet.

Internet should make it possible to give us "proof"! Remote viewing would be the most easy thing to proof. But this seem not to happen.

There are people that make videos and blogs about all kinds of talents. But why are there no remote viewers doint little shows, videos, blogs ..etc..

Humans always want to show what they can. And wonders spread like a virus on the internet. But i never saw more than "scientific studies" about nameless people. So when someone is good in farting he shows the whole world on youtube but if he is a remote viewer he is scared to show it?

reply to post by CastleMadeOfSand


what are u talking about?


This topic is about something which will not swallow our whole existence. Its not about something in our head. Its about a simple question and a simple answer: can u see what is in this and that position in my room etc.... Answer: Yes: this or that.

Don´t make it more complicated than it is. Its easy to proof if it exits.

"wormholes.."

reply to post by kauskau

but if he is a remote viewer he is scared to show it?

I suggest you look up the name Ingo Swann.

Probably the most famous RV'er ever. IMO, he more than proves It's possible.

reply to post by Rising Against


i will.

Originally posted by kauskau
reply to post by Rising Against

 

i will.

Here's a thread I authored a while ago as well: Project Stargate. It, again IMO, more than shows RV is possible (It also had millions of American Dollars put into It's research).

Here's an interesting link of one of his RV sessions also: Ingo Swann - Remote Viewing Jupiter

reply to post by kauskau


I have been correct once on here. So your wrong about everything so far

reply to post by THEDUDE86




Link?

(u were lucky)

I am only wrong if u can be correct again.