It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TREASONFX
Still makes no sense to send a fighter jet on a 3000mile round trip to libya and back to UK when the same targets could of been took out by jets in the area
Originally posted by stumason
but in terms of last nights bombardment, it would have taken
them too long to forward deploy then attack.
Originally posted by Irish Matador
reply to post by stumason
No English bias here so you can put that in the bottom drawer as its gets very tiring. I am commenting on the Libyan situation and NOTHING else.
The English goverment have been the ones pushing the need for attacks from day one. I think you are being very short sighted as to the real situation.
Originally posted by Irish Matador
Maybe you should click the link in my post rather than watch Cameron giving his so full on "british speech".
The power of the media is very scary!!
In 2008 Britain approved arms sales to Libya worth some $18 million and $13.5 million in the first quarter of 2009.
Prime Minister Tony Blair, accompanied by the CEO of MBDA, a European missile manufacturer in which Britain's BAE Systems has a 37.5 percent stake, made a high-profile visit to meet Gadhafi in May 2007.
Read more: www.upi.com...
In Britain, the Campaign Against the Arms Trade reports that "the UK Government had approved the export of goods including tear gas and crowd control ammunition and sniper rifles to Bahrain and Libya". The arms-promotion wing of the UK government counts Libya as a "priority market", and says "high-level political interventions" have supported UK weapons sales there. Last November, over half of the exhibitors at the Libyan Defence & Security Exhibition (LibDex) were UK companies.
Link
My biggest concern is the people. When the initial 'anti-qaddafi' rebels start seeing the ones they care about, the neutral bystanders & other fellow 'anti-qaddafi' rebels blown to pieces... Once that realization sets in.... Will the rebels turn against the coalition?
Right now the rebels are thinking its good that they're being helped out and that the bombings by the coalition will end very soon. However, I have a bad feeling that the bombings are only going to continue and the body count is only going to grow.
Thats the realization I'm speaking of. When the rebels voices once again won't be heard, this time their voices will fall on deaf ears among coalition forces.
My question is: What will these initial rebels be called once they turn against the coalition & start standing up for themselves? Will they be called 'terrorists', 'insurgents' or even worse: 'Qaddafi supporters'?
I'm all for getting rid of Qaddafi and letting the people of Libya work it out. But this might be Iraq all over again. Time will tell...
Originally posted by stumason
Also, it is rather brave of him to do this. Surely not all of those 1 million are die-hard supporters. Surely he runs the risk of arming the very people he is fighting against?
Originally posted by mydarkpassenger
I mention Italy because it's a Nato country. I'm not very familiar UK fighter loadouts, but I'd think because of Nato considerations, a lot of Nato member nations would have ammo and missiles that could be mounted on each others planes