It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by caf1550
reply to post by Unity_99
Computer simulations by Quintana, Adamas, Lissauer and Chambers (The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 660, p. 807, 2007) show that planets can form within 2 AU from the primary when the minimum separation of two stars is 10 AU. That's not enough to form a Jupiter that will herd water-carrying bodies to the inner planets, but at least most planets in this case will have nearly circular orbits. Planets farther out will have too eccentric orbits or their orbits will be perturbed by the other star and will probably be expelled. Out of 200 extrasolar planets or so discovered so far 33 are known to orbit components of binaries or triple stars, but the separations of the stars are larger than 100 AU. At those distances, a solar type star will have no influence on the temperature of a planet closer to the primary. Three planets have been discovered in binaries with separations less than 20 AU. This does not mean that closer binaries have no planets, but discovering them with available techniques is difficult. By the way, a recent investigation by Eggenberger, Udry, Mazeh, Segal and Mayor (Astronomy and Astrophyics, Vol. 466, p. 1179, 2007) failed to confirm the existence of a Jupiter-like planet around HD 188753 A.
if there is a binary star system and the primary star is more massive then the secondary star all planets that would form would form around the primary star if they formed around the secondary star they would be expelled from the solar system because there orbits are so eccentric
If one of the stars is far enough or have much less mass than the other, planets will form around the more massive star, called the primary star, and will have nearly circular orbits. This is important to prevent the planet from becoming too hot or too cold at different times of the year
www.madsci.org...
i don't get it whenever a comet is about to pass us people say it "wormwood" or "nibiru" why can't it just be a comet why does the passing of a comet always spell disaster to some people
whne both halleys comet and hale-bopp passed again people were saying that it is the supposed "wormwood" or the supposed "nibiru"
"wormwood" is from the bible....the bible defenitley one of the most believeable books out there
"nibiru" thank you Nancy Leiber for telling us to kill our pets way to go sweetheart oh and also when she was proved wrong she just simply chnaged her date to guess what 2012
its a comet people....not the end of the world....deal with this fact
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ghost375
and assuming Nibiru is in Elenin's position,
That would put this hoax planet inside of the orbit of Jupiter. Why can't we see it? BECAUSE IT IS A HOAX.
Originally posted by Sky watcher
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ghost375
and assuming Nibiru is in Elenin's position,
That would put this hoax planet inside of the orbit of Jupiter. Why can't we see it? BECAUSE IT IS A HOAX.
Because a Brown Dwarf Star is dark and will not reflect very much light at all, Its made of mostly rust AKA Iron Oxide. Check the position with an infra-red lens and you will spot it, no comet.
Soon people will be spotting it with regular night vision optics.
Do some fact checking before you spout off at the yapper please because correcting you is really getting old.
Originally posted by Sky watcher
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ghost375
and assuming Nibiru is in Elenin's position,
That would put this hoax planet inside of the orbit of Jupiter. Why can't we see it? BECAUSE IT IS A HOAX.
Because a Brown Dwarf Star is dark and will not reflect very much light at all, Its made of mostly rust AKA Iron Oxide. Check the position with an infra-red lens and you will spot it, no comet.
Soon people will be spotting it with regular night vision optics.
Do some fact checking before you spout off at the yapper please because correcting you is really getting old.
Originally posted by NyxOne
Originally posted by Sky watcher
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ghost375
and assuming Nibiru is in Elenin's position,
That would put this hoax planet inside of the orbit of Jupiter. Why can't we see it? BECAUSE IT IS A HOAX.
Because a Brown Dwarf Star is dark and will not reflect very much light at all, Its made of mostly rust AKA Iron Oxide. Check the position with an infra-red lens and you will spot it, no comet.
Soon people will be spotting it with regular night vision optics.
Do some fact checking before you spout off at the yapper please because correcting you is really getting old.
Bull and #.
Brown dwarfs have the same composition as Jupiter. Therefore, even if it had a non-existent albedo, it would still be around a magnitude of 2, which is clearly visible to the naked eye,
Oh, and this would have happened. In the 90s.
www.youtube.com...
Where's all the reports of planets being torn from their orbits, hm?
But hey, I'm a guy who respects common sense.
Elenin is also around magnitude 14, and completely invisible to the naked eye. So, no, no dinky camera would spot it.edit on 6-4-2011 by NyxOne because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Khazaq
Originally posted by NyxOne
Originally posted by Sky watcher
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ghost375
and assuming Nibiru is in Elenin's position,
That would put this hoax planet inside of the orbit of Jupiter. Why can't we see it? BECAUSE IT IS A HOAX.
Because a Brown Dwarf Star is dark and will not reflect very much light at all, Its made of mostly rust AKA Iron Oxide. Check the position with an infra-red lens and you will spot it, no comet.
Soon people will be spotting it with regular night vision optics.
Do some fact checking before you spout off at the yapper please because correcting you is really getting old.
Bull and #.
Brown dwarfs have the same composition as Jupiter. Therefore, even if it had a non-existent albedo, it would still be around a magnitude of 2, which is clearly visible to the naked eye,
Oh, and this would have happened. In the 90s.
www.youtube.com...
Where's all the reports of planets being torn from their orbits, hm?
But hey, I'm a guy who respects common sense.
Elenin is also around magnitude 14, and completely invisible to the naked eye. So, no, no dinky camera would spot it.edit on 6-4-2011 by NyxOne because: (no reason given)
How do we know the reports and sightings are not being suppressed? As in, "Shut up and we'll give you a spot in an underground bunker"?
Because a Brown Dwarf Star is dark and will not reflect very much light at all, Its made of mostly rust AKA Iron Oxide. Check the position with an infra-red lens and you will spot it, no comet.
The atmospheres contain primarily gases, including gaseous iron and silicate. At hotter temperatures-3,140 degrees Fahrenheit (2,000 degrees Kelvin)-typical of younger brown dwarfs, the iron remains in its gaseous phase. Over time as the glowing body cools, the iron condenses to form iron-rich clouds and droplets of liquid-iron rain.
Soon people will be spotting it with regular night vision optics.
Do some fact checking before you spout off at the yapper please because correcting you is really getting old.
Originally posted by NyxOne
Something that would have the exact same luminosity as Jupiter, if it existed, is being 'suppressed'?
Something that would be tearing planets out of orbits, if it existed, is being 'suppressed'?
Okay. Keep living in that strange little world of yours.
Originally posted by Khazaq
Originally posted by NyxOne
Something that would have the exact same luminosity as Jupiter, if it existed, is being 'suppressed'?
Something that would be tearing planets out of orbits, if it existed, is being 'suppressed'?
Okay. Keep living in that strange little world of yours.
Wouldn't have the same luminosity as Jupiter. A brown dwarf does not reflect as much light as a gas giant. And it's perfectly possible for a brown dwarf to be roughly the size of Jupiter while still having a lot more mass.
How do we know there are not other unknown bodies in our system exerting gravitational influence on the planets. Scientists have been theorizing about Nemesis and/or Tyche for awhile now. Perhaps there is something near or around our system which offsets the gravitational influence of the approaching brown dwarf star so that it only drastically effects planets when it is directly aligned with the individual planet and the sun?
How do we know that planets would be ripped out of their orbits? I think you're being over-dramatic. The gravitational pull of a small brown dwarf is obviously much weaker than that of our sun.edit on 7-4-2011 by Khazaq because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Khazaq
All you naysayers can lie to us or lie to yourselves or remain in denial for as long as you like. But the children of God know the truth. We know what's coming.
Originally posted by Khazaq
All you naysayers can lie to us or lie to yourselves or remain in denial for as long as you like. But the children of God know the truth. We know what's coming.
Originally posted by guessing
Originally posted by Khazaq
All you naysayers can lie to us or lie to yourselves or remain in denial for as long as you like. But the children of God know the truth. We know what's coming.
how do you know the truth, if you indeed do, please
pass it around to those who seek it...
I am a child of god as is every human.. yet i am only guessing....