More earthquakes

reply to post by PuterMan


go back a little further than 365 days, and you could add chile to that list

that makes it

japan - check (9.0) earth in alignment with elenin

new zealand - check (7.2) sun in alignment with elenin

chile - check (8.8) earth in alignment with elenin

and finally, arkansas - not checked yet, lets wait till next alignment.

reply to post by PuterMan


not sure on your figures there as you have missed off the important MAG figures, none of yours show any
but I see what you mean when you say seems normal, can you show any figures for the ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA. because I still think thats where we are going to see some bigger quakes in the next few weeks

reply to post by kermithermit111

Good point, can you check or show any figures for the ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA.
I think thats where we are going to see some bigger quakes in the next few days or weeks.
dont know why but this place seems to have been standing out alot to me, I know its only having small Quakes at the moment but I get the feeling something is getting bigger there. I dont even know why this place keeps nigling at my thoughts but you never know with these hunches

take a look at this recent image of the earthquakes for the last day/week
earthquake.usgs.gov...
can you see the pattern building, look straight line from west africa through to japan and up towards north america
now go back to in between japan and africa and follow the route south east across through north australia to south america area
look where all the larger quakes are hitting, to me looks like a pattern is definately forming
and I cant work out what it is thats bugging me about these quakes
does anyone know if all these lines have any volcanoes along them apart from the obvious japan one

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by psyclops777

 

I don't know if this helps anyone or not but I have just spent some time doing cumulative graphs (the ones I often display here on ATS) for every area I can think off.

I lost count but it was over 60 graphs so i won't upload them!!!!!

Basically what I am saying is that despite what the popular theory may be, all is pretty much normal except those three areas.

edit on 19/3/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)

Puterman
Thanks to you and TA for all the feedback and info over the past week or so. I think alot of speculation is thrown out there without much info backing up the claims or predictions. It may seem normal but if you don't follow the EQ activity like myself, it might seem unusual. Thanks for keeping it in the right perspective.

reply to post by pale5218


what claims or predictions are you referring to?

even as PM said, there are some places with odd activity.

i thank him for his and TA's research as well, but i don't think they're the only ones here with the "correct perspective"

Originally posted by kermithermit111
reply to post by pale5218

 

what claims or predictions are you referring to?

even as PM said, there are some places with odd activity.

i thank him for his and TM's research as well, but i don't think they're the only ones here with the "correct perspective"

I took this oportunity to thank PM for his input. There have been numerous predicitons over the past week about where a major EQ was going to happen, on many threads. It was not my intention of putting down anything or anyone on this thread about the current activity. His perspective is the one I have been seeing over the past week, along with TA. If there are others with the same perspective, well I'll just have to thank them too, when I see it. Didn't mean to leave anyone out.

It would appear now that north america around the California area is starting to see small EQ activity again

is anyone on who can confirm this, it looks like only small ones around 2.8 - 3.9

but all the same nice to know if this data is accurate

just found new link to put quakes in perspective
www.iris.edu...

ty

south of new zealand 4.6 mag. hmm that interesting
not seen one here recently, not since the biggy of christchurch any ways , hope its not impacting them
earthquake.usgs.gov...

reply to post by psyclops777


The magnitudes are in the list. The 4th column. This is not a USGS listing it is a CSV of USGS data. Count the commas!!!

reply to post by psyclops777

south of new zealand 4.6 mag. hmm that interesting

No, not interesting particularly as you will see below. I have 1206 earthquakes listed for New Zealand in the last 30 days.

Allow me to explain. USGS do not list anything under mag 4.5 that is not in the US. In addition to that, many USGS values for magnitudes are lower than the counterparts in the country of origin.

reply to post by psyclops777


If you want links for earthquake sites, volcanoes, seismograms, GPS etc look at the first link in my signature.

In addition to all the global sites you will find many more localised ones as well.

Edit to add: You may find this very visual tool of interest. Scroll to the bottom of the linked page.

qvsdata.wordpress.com...

It is called Earthquake 3D. It is free for the basic version.

reply to post by psyclops777


Yes that is not problem. These are both cumulative values of earthquake counts for the past 365 days

First the Aleutians


As you can see there is a little 'kink' in January but that has settled down now.

Next Alaska
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/bd7868d664f5.jpg[/atsimg]

Straight as a die!!

Earth's growing pains.
In the Atlantic
5.3 03/19/2011 Ascension Island Region
4.8 03/16/2011 northern mid-atlantic ridge
5.4 03/17/2011 south sandwich island
1.6 03/18/2011 New Hampshire
2.5 03/19/2011 Northern Alabama

Originally posted by kdog1982
Earth's growing pains.
In the Atlantic
5.3 03/19/2011 Ascension Island Region
4.8 03/16/2011 northern mid-atlantic ridge
5.4 03/17/2011 south sandwich island
1.6 03/18/2011 New Hampshire
2.5 03/19/2011 Northern Alabama

I can provide more info for these quake,I'm just giving the short version.

Originally posted by kermithermit111
reply to post by PuterMan

 

go back a little further than 365 days, and you could add chile to that list

that makes it

japan - check (9.0) earth in alignment with elenin

new zealand - check (7.2) sun in alignment with elenin

chile - check (8.8) earth in alignment with elenin

and finally, arkansas - not checked yet, lets wait till next alignment.

With the best will in the world even the most recent so called alignment on the 15th March which was supposed to precipitate disaster and did not. The reason is of course because Elenin is so small by comparison to Earth that even if she wiggled right by at .02 AU there would be no gravitational effect discernible.

Originally posted by PuterMan

Originally posted by kermithermit111
reply to post by PuterMan

 

go back a little further than 365 days, and you could add chile to that list

that makes it

japan - check (9.0) earth in alignment with elenin

new zealand - check (7.2) sun in alignment with elenin

chile - check (8.8) earth in alignment with elenin

and finally, arkansas - not checked yet, lets wait till next alignment.

With the best will in the world even the most recent so called alignment on the 15th March which was supposed to precipitate disaster and did not. The reason is of course because Elenin is so small by comparison to Earth that even if she wiggled right by at .02 AU there would be no gravitational effect discernible.

glad you said that Puter,.
it has been rumored that Elenin was bigger than earth,.
and it has been compared to ............ Nibiru

What the hell is going on??? Earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanoes, Libya war, supermoon?

Our poor planet ):

reply to post by PuterMan


when did i say anything about march 15th?

and are you completely closed minded to the possibility that "comet" elenin has a bigger mass than published so far?

Originally posted by kermithermit111
reply to post by PuterMan

 

when did i say anything about march 15th?

and are you completely closed minded to the possibility that "comet" elenin has a bigger mass than published so far?

Actually I am probably amongst the more open-minded people on ATS which is the very reason why on my thread about Elenin I have been happy to host all ranges of discussion of the comet and various different postulations.

From a purely practical aspect if the comet has a mass thousands of times greater than is currently supposed then there would have been perturbations of orbit along the way tracked so far since Elenin is know to have passed close by other bodies with no effect upon the orbits of either. That alone would indicate that whilst we may not know the EXACT size, the mass is not sufficient to have an effect upon anything on Earth at these so called 'conjunctions'

Whilst you may not have mentioned the date March 15th specifically you talked about the 'conjunction' of Elenin in relation to various earthquakes and March the 15th is one such conjunction.

None of those or any future 'conjucntion' is likely to have any effect upon earthquake frequency on planet Earth. That is not being closed-minded, that is being rational.