French warplane fires on Libya

Originally posted by disfugured
reply to post by XxRagingxPandaxX

 

That makes no sense! The US still elect tyrants! So why invade another nation and call it justified because you deem Libya's tyrant less tyrannical than that of your own?

Our tyrant was england. Libya's tyrant is MORE tyrannical than ours, The rebels want a new start and a democracy. And i'm glad the U.S. and other western powers are for that.

reply to post by ramuh


that is just too true

star for you there

reply to post by XxRagingxPandaxX


I don't think so. You have a new Tyrant on average.. once every four to eight years. Put forth by an even larger Tyrant organization called the FED. Behind the curtain, they select a group of tyrants you get to vote for once every election. Your forefathers warned about it hundreds of times yet, your people still fall for the same trick each and every election to this very day. Same goes for the country I reside in.. it's just done slightly different. All the NATO forces will do is put a puppet government in like they do to every country they cause an uprising to.

reply to post by disfugured


Thought I plant a link to icbjr1979's thread here on America firing missiles, just happened now:

icbj's thread to America firing missiles

There are links to it further down

reply to post by thisisnotaname


Sorry thisisnotaname I wanted to thank you for posting the youtube link, then everybody here started talking at the same time, and forgot all about it, now I was going through all my tabs and came across the one where I started to thank you.

So here is your thank you for the link to the youtube video post on the subject Finally

yw

reply to post by Fenix777


Just found this article on this too:

Coalition launches attack..

I don't know which part to quote, much of it is shocking and thought provoking.

reply to post by thisisnotaname


Wow! I am so glad I'm not there at the moment, thanks for the vid update. I don't understand their title though, who got shot by who? It sounds like Libya shot down one of the French? Is that correct?

This is bad, this is really bad. I don't like this not one little bit, I got a bad feeling about this. There's something very off about this, but as usual, I feel we don't have all the information, and therefore can only work with half the information. For example the SA president said that they support the intervention, but, there's something wrong with that too, why would he suddenly support an intervention, where as before he was against it?

Don't get me wrong, it's just that I think war is a bad bad thing, there are no winners in it, only losses, what I am questioning are the motives. I mean, 5 countries ganged up on Gadhafi when the president of Zimbabwe Mugabe, has done the same to his people, and worse in some instances, and they did nothing? What about the DRC in fact, let's just look at just about the whole African country. That's why I am questioning the motives. Ok, let's forget Zim and the rest, let's just look at all the other Middle East revolts going on lately, that's more recent, why not intervene there? But 5 Countries gang up on Gadhafi in Libya? It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. They say it's to help the people force Gadhafi out, so they gain nothing by this? They just fired 110 missiles in and around Tripoli, and they gain nothing out of it, it's just to help the people? Riiiiight, and I'm the pope.