It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by Kingbreaker
We've got some sociopaths in here, don't we?
Your idea of justice is outdated and inadequate. We don't do that stuff anymore because that is the behavior of animals.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by Liquesence
I know more British white youths engage with that kind of behaviour than youth members of ethnic minorities, certainly in my town. Most of them will be voting BNP in a couple of years... ironic isnt it?
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by jstanthrno1
It didn't work, because people were hung etc regularly... If it worked, there would have been no more criminals, and they would have never had to try something else.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by blueorder
And I am assuming ,that you are going to post up some proof of that? What holds true for the cities, does not hold true for all of the nation. Demographics vary dependant on location, and crime statistics vary in terms of the perpetrators from one place to another also. There is NO statistic I have ever seen which says that gang rape, or rape of any kind is partaken of by any massive degree, by blacks or whites or brown or yellow.
The TRUTH is that human beings are flawed and sick sometimes. It matters not either way what colour a person is, because it is what a person has been through that makes the majority of thier psyche, not what racial characteristics they carried from thier ancestors.
'
Because interracial rape is now overwhelmingly black on white, it has become difficult to do research on it or to find relevant statistics. The FBI keeps very detailed national records on crime, but the way it presents rape data obscures the racial element rather than clarifies it. Dr. William Wilbanks, a criminologist at Florida International University, had to sift carefully through the data to find that in 1988 there were 9,406 cases of black-on-white rape and fewer than ten cases of white-on-black rape. Another researcher concludes that in 1989, blacks were three or four times more likely to commit rape than whites, and that black men raped white women thirty times as often as white men raped black women. Interracial crime figures are even worse than they sound. Since there are more than six times as many whites as blacks in America, it means that any given black person is vastly more likely to commit a crime against a white than vice versa.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
reply to post by ReRun
I will point out that that is a white racist website that the statistics are aggregated on.
The studies themselves look like they are done by reputable sources, but having taken statistics, I am well aware that how those figures are arrived at is very important in determining how relevant they are, how unbiased, etc. It may be that they are fairly represented, but to be sure of that we would need to go back to the source studies and examine the methodology.
Secondly, most rapes and gang rapes by far are committed by men. How do you feel about us just dispensing with the racial comments and pointing out that it is the chest beating tribalism of men and their nasty animal nature that is responsible for this? Do you feel it is fair that the actions of some men get spread outward onto all of them?