It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amadeus
IESOUS ARMS HIS DISCIPLES WITH REAL SWORDS: read all about it.
Luke 22:30-40 about Iesous ordering his disciples to sell their outer tunics on a cold night and buy swords with the cash. Matthew and Mark and John mention the ear cutting, but not how the disciples got swords in the first place... Why do you think "Iesous" was crucified for armed sedition in the first place? Do you think nice mamby pamby little Rebbes telling harmless parables start riots in Temples?
Obviously the term is symbolic in Luke and parallels other figures of ancient literature "sweating blood" see Luke 22:44
12 LEGIONS OF ANGELS in MATTHEW's GREEK GOSPEL
See Matt 26:53 : Have you never read this passage before?
If you've never read these text portions in your bible, maybe you need to go out and buy a better translation??
[edit on 25-10-2004 by Amadeus]
Originally posted by Seraphim_Serpente
Not even Priests & Scholars know for sure.
[edit on 26-10-2004 by Seraphim_Serpente]
Originally posted by Amadeus
Hi Saint4God:
Either way, it is clear that the idea of the Virgin Birth did not exist prior to around AD 90 after Jerusalem fell to the Romans,
lSomething by the way Paul would have had no trouble with if it meant bringing in more believers to the faith, by whichever way necessary ("to a Jew I became a Jew to a Goy I became a Goy etc.)
There may have been other motives too, but these are two of the main ones it seems to me...the first REACTIVE and the second one PROACTIVE...
There are OT manuscripts dated BC that tell of the virgin birth. And Paul was a Jew. Jews had certain things they did and didn't do as part of tradition. Paul knew what they were so he is saying when he is witnessing to jews he would be very careful not to offend them so that he could best present the gospel. When he was with the gentiles he could use different, yet proper ways to tell them.
I hate to be critical, but Amadeus said in this post that is "seems" to him. That says a mouthful. But I also hate untruths.
Originally posted by Amadeus
Midrashic tendencies in Matthew's gospel makes the writer play a little fast and loose with facts. He even has Iesous riding into Jerusalem ON TWO ANIMALS to fulfil a mistranslation in his version prophecy (Zechariah 9:9-12) (Matthew's translation is from a late Aramaic Targum: Lowly, riding on a DONKEY... AND THE FOAL OF A DONKEY)
Originally posted by Amadeus
Why did Matthew and Luke both go to so much trouble to trace Iesous lineage back to David (like a good Messiah) with their "boring-begats" through JOSEPH if Mary was supposed to have been "physically" impregnated by [the "holy spirit" of] "God"...and not her betrothed Joseph?
Originally posted by Amadeus
Looks like the final editors of the book in the 2nd or even in the 3rd century had to make what material was in "Matthew" and "Luke" fit the prevailing Roman Catholic belief in a Virginal Conception----the texts simply make no sense as they stand (e.g. "as was supposed" the father of Iesous etc.)
The Church also had other people in the early 2nd century loudly complaining about this (the phrase"..and pay no attention to all these endless Genealogies" is placed into the mouth of "Paul" in the Epistles to Timothy (whoever actually wrote those, it still meant that contradictory genealogies were floating around trying to "prove" Iesous' descent through David in order to make him a viable candidate for the "Messiah").
Originally posted by Amadeus
(and how many Christians do you know these days that have the guts to face this problem head on?)
Originally posted by saint4God
Besides, how does someone who is completely man perform such miracles?
Originally posted by Seraphim_Serpente
Greek into English.
But then again - We are ALL the Children of God - are we not?
Let me ask you a question Dbrandt - do you believe that if you follow the Path that Christ laid out - if you partake of Communion in Mass - that you actually become a PART of CHRIST - i.e. a CHRIST-ian?
[edit on 30-10-2004 by Seraphim_Serpente]
Who is this man called Jesus Christ?
Originally posted by Amadeus
Emmanuel is a WAR CHANT... not a title for the Messiah, originally, even though the Jews of the 1st century sometimes mis applied it that way.
Of course. What better way to manipulate the masses by causing them to question what they are told? This is an age old trick. Create the worst possible character and scenarios that can be dreamed up for those who do not follow your beliefs. Think about how ludicrous is this claim, and how it continues today in all aspects of politics, which is all it is. We have had 4,000 years of history of the Jews forever being assailed, conquered, wondering in the wilderness, famine, pestilence, back to Egypt, saved from Egypt, back to Egypt several times more. Their having invoked the wrath of God in the flood, the tower of Babel, the numerous wars, the destruction of their temple and their homeland. Seth replacing Cain looking for righteousness and failing; Noah granted the continuation of progeny nevertheless; Abraham forsaking his son by his concubine for legitimacy of parentage; David killing a woman's husband for his want of her and still remaining the heir apparent to this day; Solomon, that wise man engaging in licentious acts, and on and on and on. Each story expects us to believe that for 3,760 years the Jews despite all of the hardship, perversion and destruction they too brought to others, are still God's chosen people in the end.
Originally posted by Seraphim_Serpente
Quote: "Jesus informs us that those who do not believe in Him are of their Father - Satan."
The same holds true in Christianity, and more so. It invokes a carnage far worse than any other proscribed religion. It survives on fear, in the vestiges of one named Lucifer, and the very thought that if you do not believe, you have been consumed by that angel of hell.
Beliefs & Attitudes like this are probably why Jews & Moslems HATE Christians So Much! That being said - I actually agree with you! There is no
"Love of God" in Judaism & Islam - only Fear & Wrath. You better do what God says or you will be Punished - Dammed to Hell & what not.
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
All nicely fit into a doctrine to show how Jesus had the ability to make unbelievers and evil men good. I have no doubt that those men existed, but they were not as being represented here.
.
Originally posted by Seraphim_Serpente
People must have Faith of their own Free Will - they cannot be FORCED to believe anything!!! Inquisition Tactics do not work & are Ethically Repugnant!
Originally posted by dbrandt
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
All nicely fit into a doctrine to show how Jesus had the ability to make unbelievers and evil men good. I have no doubt that those men existed, but they were not as being represented here.
.
Through christ the vilest sinner can be saved. Paul admits he was a murderer and thought of himself as the least of any. He actually did meet Jesus on the road to Damascus. Now my eyes have never seen Him literally, yet I believe. You don't understand how God can change a life.