It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Essan
What do you think all the talk about Geoengineering governance issue are about?
I'm sure they would like to do what you're suggesting but currently it's not allowed.
They are allowed to inject into the lower atmosphere though.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Essan
What do you think all the talk about Geoengineering governance issue are about?
I'm sure they would like to do what you're suggesting but currently it's not allowed.
They are allowed to inject into the lower atmosphere though.
Then try checking it with flightaware.com... to try and determine if the plane is flying a scheduled route to it's destination. Then you can try to view the chemtrail cloud using some weather satellite websites
Dear Ms. Miller:
1.0 Per your three (3) samples submitted to the writer (Project No.SMS 514); attached please find the Analytical Results Summary for samples number (s) 514-1, 514-2 and 514-3 This summary also includes the proper and completed Chain of Custody.
1.1 There is also a copy of your original sample labels which have been "G" 'd in with the above samples.
2.0 If you look at the "Results" of each one of the "Parameters" ; there is consistancy here. This would indicate a very controlled delivery (dispersion) of Chemtrails by aircraft in your area.
2.1 The "Results" would also indicate that the contaminants would have had to be delivered in large amounts (pounds per min.) and in concentrated form.
2.2 In addition to the above; we would not expect to find the above "Parameters" under normal circumstances (regardless of quantity) in your area.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
This is an article that shows there are more unusually high amounts of aluminum and barium showing up in tests of rainwater samples.
www.nineteenthirteen.org...
Dear Ms. Miller:
1.0 Per your three (3) samples submitted to the writer (Project No.SMS 514); attached please find the Analytical Results Summary for samples number (s) 514-1, 514-2 and 514-3 This summary also includes the proper and completed Chain of Custody.
1.1 There is also a copy of your original sample labels which have been "G" 'd in with the above samples.
2.0 If you look at the "Results" of each one of the "Parameters" ; there is consistancy here. This would indicate a very controlled delivery (dispersion) of Chemtrails by aircraft in your area.
2.1 The "Results" would also indicate that the contaminants would have had to be delivered in large amounts (pounds per min.) and in concentrated form.
2.2 In addition to the above; we would not expect to find the above "Parameters" under normal circumstances (regardless of quantity) in your area.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by firepilot
You can find the lab reports here.
www.chemtrails911.com...
www.rense.com...
arizonaskywatch.com...
californiaskywatch.com...
In a one-week study, the authors of this report conducted a technical review and evaluation of proposed climate engineering concepts that might serve as a rapid palliative response to such climate emergency scenarios. Because of their potential to induce a prompt (
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by firepilot
You can find the lab reports here.
www.chemtrails911.com...
californiaskywatch.com...
arizonaskywatch.com...
www.rense.com...
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
Atmospheric Aerosol Injection
In a one-week study...
Originally posted by Essan
And I might add to my previous post, what has any of this to do with stratospheric engineering?
It's like arguing that beetles are mating with elephants and attempting to prove it by showing evidence that sparrows mate with sparrows.
deliberate disinofrmation or what?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by MathiasAndrew
I just have to wonder who is reflexively starring these ridiculous posts???
It appears you don't even READ what you post, over and over again. (Or, you just cannot comprehend them? Is this the case?)
Since you copied nearly the ENTIRE body of text from your source (NOT a good idea!), it is all there for everyone else to read....but, focusing on just THIS is a clue:
In a one-week study...
See that word there? "study". *study!!*
Quite laughable, you writing about "truth" and "setting free"....how nonsensical, considering the actual information contained in the STUDY!!
Have you taken my advice, yet, and gone to Tucson, Arizona, to visit the boneyard?? You know, where you were so certain (from more bogus claims, and YouTube "sources") of the huge "chem"-planes base?? Remember?
That LIE about Evergreen International, and Marana, AZ. ....and Pinal Airpark?
Or, have you just moved on, after realizing your mistake? Yet, continuing with more incorrect posts?? IS this so hard to understand?
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
No visitors are allowed into the Evergreen Maintenance facility, you should know that. Why would you lie and pretend the public can visit it?
Have you ever tried to visit it? Take my advice, you better call ahead of time.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Essan
First of all I did not decline to engage in that discussion. As I previously had told you at the time I was already involved with too many discussions about that topic already.
Next you know quite well that the troposphere and stratosphere do not have exact fixed altitudes. They constanly vary.
reply to post by Essan
Bearing in mind also that no-one has a clue what is you believe or why you believe it.