It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by edog11
Discouraging/preventing/punishing corruption and illegal conduct is supposed to be the US government's own job but since said government is too corrupt to perform this task, men like Manning are feeling obliged to take over the task and to try to make a difference by giving us the people the truth so that we can demand reforms.
Originally posted by dalan.
I honestly hope their are riots to free Manning.
Their needs to be.
I have no freedom to take. I have all my freedom. I have an education. I have a very high paying job. I own a flat. I own two cars. I can drink alcohol on the street. I can smoke anywhere I like. My bars and clubs are open until 7am. I can buy a prostitute if I so please.
It is unlikely that there will be riots to free Manning especially as he will most probably be sentenced to jail time.
Would you participate in a riot and risk your personal safety, likely with no effect on the sentence, to make a point?
Where do you expect such riots will occur?
Originally posted by RustyShakleford92
reply to post by dalan.
Want to tell me what my true freedom is then? What am I missing out on? What is freedom? Freedom is different to everyone.
The only two things where I feel my freedoms are violated is the fact that drugs are illegal, and that I need a visa to go to many places, which is a pain in the butt. But besides that, I have no complaints.
Originally posted by RustyShakleford92
reply to post by dalan.
As I agree. And in which case the only way my freedoms are being held above me right now is that drugs are illegal, and which doesn't really upset me at the moment because of the healthy lifestyle I choose to follow.
Everyone's perception of freedom is different.
Originally posted by Misoir
Originally posted by edog11
Doesn't the Oath of Allegiance state "to protect the USA from enemies foreign and domestic"?
Yes it does. Now are we supposed to enter a game where it is left up to individual interpretation to decide who is or is not a foreign or domestic enemy? Please inform me of what legal position you hold to make such a decision?
Took a huge cache of classified and top secret documents and released them.
What he did was illegal and traitorous. He deserves every punishment reserved for traitors in my opinion, including and up to death. How do we know what other secrets he divulged and how many people he put at risk? I think I understand what he thought he was attempting to accomplish but it does not make him a hero by any means. This is of course coming from an American's perspective and not that of American enemies.
Originally posted by phatpackage
Originally posted by RustyShakleford92
reply to post by edog11
Mr. Manning would already be dead if he pulled this stunt in any other country. What he did was illegal. You do something that is illegal, you pay the consequences. Doesn't matter if you agree with the politics behind it, legal is legal, and illegal is illegal.
This is exactly right, he did it. Assange and wikileaks, well that's a different issue. They did not steal the data they just published it big difference!. Manning was in a position of trust and breached that trust. He probably even took an oath or signed something to say he would not do it, but he did it anyway. Wikileaks did not agree or sign to anything, therefore they should not be touched over this.