Cornell University reveals Planet X

Heres one for the Planet X haters out there



Persistent Evidence Oof a Jovian Mass Solar Companion in the Oort Cloud

We present an updated dynamical and statistical analysis of outer Oort cloud cometary evidence suggesting the sun has a wide-binary Jovian mass companion. The results support a conjecture that there exists a companion of mass ~ 1-4 M_Jup orbiting in the innermost region of the outer Oort cloud. Our most restrictive prediction is that the orientation angles of the orbit normal in galactic coordinates are centered on the galactic longitude of the ascending node Omega = 319 degree and the galactic inclination i = 103 degree (or the opposite direction) with an uncertainty in the normal direction subtending ~ 2% of the sky. A Bayesian statistical analysis suggests that the probability of the companion hypothesis is comparable to or greater than the probability of the null hypothesis of a statistical fluke. Such a companion could also have produced the detached Kuiper Belt object Sedna. The putative companion could be easily detected by the recently launched Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE).

search.arxiv.org:8081...

found here

______beforeitsnews/story/446/339/Planet_X_Revealed_by_Cornell_University.html

Have fun no biting or scratching please

And another

search.arxiv.org:8081...

Giant Nemesis candidate HD 107914 / HIP 60503 for the perforation of Oort cloud
Authors: Igor Yu. Potemine

Abstract: So far, GJ 710 is the only known star supposed to pass through outskirts of the solar system within 1 ly. We have reexamined the SIMBAD database for additional stellar candidates (from highest ratios of squared parallax to total proper motion) and compared them with new HIP2 parallaxes and known radial velocities. At the moment, the best nominee is double star HD 107914 in the constellation Centaurus at $\approx$ 78.3 pc from the Sun whose principal component is a white (A-type) giant. It does not seem to appear neither in general catalogues of radial velocities available at SIMBAD nor in authoritative Garcia-Sanchez et al. papers on stellar encounters with the solar system. Awaiting for the value $v_r$ of its radial velocity, uknown to the author, we have calculated limits of $|v_r|$ necessary to this star to pass within 1 ly and 1 pc from the Sun in linear approximation. A very accurate value of its total proper motion is also extremely important. In the case of $v_r=-100$ km/s and most "advantageous" HIP2 data, HD 107914 could pass as near as 8380 AU from the Sun in an almost direct collision course with the inner part of the solar system! Inversely, if $v_r$ had a great positive value, then HIP 60503 could be the creator of peculiar trajectories of detached trans-Neptunian objects like Sedna.

search.arxiv.org:8081...

Nemesis Reconsidered
Authors: Adrian L. Melott (University of Kansas), Richard K. Bambach (Smithsonian Institution Museum of Natural History)
Abstract: The hypothesis of a companion object (Nemesis) orbiting the Sun was motivated by the claim of a terrestrial extinction periodicity, thought to be mediated by comet showers. The orbit of a distant companion to the Sun is expected to be perturbed by the Galactic tidal field and encounters with passing stars, which will induce variation in the period. We examine the evidence for the previously proposed periodicity, using two modern, greatly improved paleontological datasets of fossil biodiversity. We find that there is a narrow peak at 27 My in the cross-spectrum of extinction intensity time series between these independent datasets. This periodicity extends over a time period nearly twice that for which it was originally noted. An excess of extinction events are associated with this periodicity at 99% confidence. In this sense we confirm the originally noted feature in the time series for extinction. However, we find that it displays extremely regular timing for about 0.5 Gy. The regularity of the timing compared with earlier calculations of orbital perturbation would seem to exclude the Nemesis hypothesis as a causal factor.

This is no different than the UFO phenomenon.
It really doesn't matter how much evidence you throw out there,
there will ALWAYS be those who will go down kicking and screaming till the bitter end
because they are simply not ready for their world view to come crashing down around them.

It is becoming abundantly clear that there is something out there and people higher up on the food chain are aware of it
and prepared for it.

I sincerely hope I'm wrong but I don't think I am.

Originally posted by Screwed
This is no different than the UFO phenomenon.
It really doesn't matter how much evidence you throw out there,
there will ALWAYS be those who will go down kicking and screaming till the bitter end
because they are simply not ready for their world view to come crashing down around them.

It is becoming abundantly clear that there is something out there and people higher up on the food chain are aware of it
and prepared for it.

I sincerely hope I'm wrong but I don't think I am.

I know man, I strongly dislike how this all works out. No matter how much evidence I point out to close-minded people who think they're open-minded, I get bashed for it and flamed for it. I keep telling them to Wake Up and they're all whiny about it saying that I'm wrong, UFOs don't even exist, and that we've never been visited by ETs before. SO MUCH evidence and we still get bashed for it. It's a shame, people being stuck in their own little world and are unconsciously scared of waking up to the coffee and smelling the reality of this world we live in.

It's a shame that the Elite know about everything and we don't. It is so greedy and unjust. I plan on surviving any future cataclysms up ahead so I'm glad we've got ATS.

well hot dog! when's it coming by? how big is the planet? is it suitable for life?

do they have any more info of it? or is it just a big rock thats coming by?

reply to post by GeeDee


Your article is from April 2010 and has already been discussed..
If a body 4 x the size of Jupiter was in our solar system I think we would see it..

not alot of people dispute that thwere could be planet bodies that havnt yet been discovered what people deny is "planet x" wich is supposedley some planet that has an orbit wich brings it either hitting earth or coming close enough to cause disasters, that is not supported in these articles.

[color=deepskyblue]Doesn't anyone know how to use ex content tags? Good grief.

While there may be evidence, there is still no hard core proof. ATSer's are not going to take it seriously until NASA confirms it.

The results support a conjecture that there exists a companion of mass ~ 1-4 M_Jup orbiting in the innermost region of the outer Oort cloud.

[color=deepskyblue]Definition of Conjecture:

1. Inference or judgment based on inconclusive or incomplete evidence; guesswork.

[color=deepskyblue]
So, sorry to rain on your parade, OP. The article itself admits that its not really evidence at all.

Well, thankfully we only have just under two more years to bring an end to all of this madness.
If this dark star/planet doesn't swing by and cause all kinds of havok then people like me will be .......WRONG!
Ohhhh the horror.
But,
I will not be.
It is coming.
I have prepared.
If you have not then I would suggest you do.
If I am wrong then I will have a # load of ammo and food just sitting around
and alot of egg on my face.
But, If I am right..........

When I looked up the "Oort Cloud" Wikipedia says it's hypothesized. So does this mean there isn't even proof of this mysterious dark comet sphere of destruction? Why should I even look further into this stuff? ....but I do because I agree that something is up in the world that some people are aware of.

When are you all going to get it through your heads, Planet X is really a state of mind ...

I watched a video yesterday on G 1.9, which presented it as though it was recent news. However, after searching the web, it was old information. Apparently, Spain was the country to announce it. So, I really don't know.

On an aside issue, the person making the presentation made a strong case as to why most observatories would not report it, due to the fact that they are all taking government funding. Could be in the clause that anything significant, they would have to run by the government first, or at least Janet Napolitano.

This is already being talked about here:
abovetopsecret.com...

It may be a new planet, or it may not be. Even the scientists who have calculated its supposed size and orbit are not sure it actually exists.

...And if it does exist, its orbit keeps it very far away from us at all times. So, if some of you think it is Nibiru -- it's not. It's simply another supposed "Planet X".

Originally posted by alyoshablue
...I watched a video yesterday on G 1.9, which presented it as though it was recent news. However, after searching the web, it was old information. Apparently, Spain was the country to announce it. So, I really don't know.

G1.9 has been proven to be a supernova 25,000 light years away (that's 1/4 of the way across our galaxy), so it is NOT a planet or brown dwarf or any other object that is anywhere near our solar system. The Spanish scientists are mistaken.

Information on G1.9 by the Chandra X-Ray observatory:
chandra.harvard.edu...

like the grunts found in vietnam
when there is somthing there to make you look up...
look down
the next step is a stake pit.

when officialdom puts out these "can't be solved riddles" backed on both sides by experts
you can bet there is something under the radar
maybe even under your ribs

reply to post by daryllyn


You're a bit harsh there I think. Sure, it may be conjecture, but it's conjecture supported by results, so says the article. All hypotheses are conjecture until they have evidence supporting them. This evidence may not be conclusive, and it's far from proof, but it is evidence.

It's actual science, the planet (if it exists) is nowhere near earth ande not visible (next to the setting or rising sun, behind chemtrails or anywhere else) without significant magnification, and would not have been known to hte Babylonians, Mayans or anyone else more than 10 years ago - all of which screws up every conspiracy theory about it!

Of course the search for a large outer-solar system body through science is quite old - and the fact that a body may be found to exist now does not mean that people like Harrington or Lowell were correct - their observations weer based on irregularities in the orbits of the outer planets - particularly Neptune, and those have been explained and/or discounted by subsequent better measurements.

I think what gets on my nerves is the fact lots of people on ATS KNOW for a fact it doesnt exist,
if anyone saw Human Alien getting savaged on here the other day youd know what im talking about,
in actual fact they dont know if it does or it doesnt, it just makes them feel superior when they are so adamant it doesnt.
Noone on this thread is actually saying this hypothesised planet swings into an orbit between mars and jupiter or the moon and mars or wherever, scientists ARE talking about it possibly existing yet the ATS so called experts obviously know more than the scientists.
My belief is that Sitchin got it only partly right and that there is a planet out there that sends comets into the solar system every few thousand years, sometimes lots of them that cause massive destruction like those on the surface of mars and sometimes it doesnt depending on the amount of objects dispersed at the time.
If im wrong im wrong
but no one KNOWS it for sure.
Thank you all for your sensible comments either FOR or AGAINST this idea.

reply to post by TheStev

[color=deepskyblue]
Deny ignorance is the motto of ATS, no? Surely you are not new around here..

I don't think I was being harsh at all by pointing out that Cornell University doesn't actually reveal "Planet X", it only reveals evidence supporting a hypothesis. The title of the thread is misleading.

I never said that it doesn't exist. No one knows that for sure. Do I think there is a good chance that some unknown body is out there waiting to be discovered? Yes. Do I think that maybe this "evidence" might be leading up to a huge discovery? Yes.

But for now it is what it is. Conjecture, speculation, hypothesis.

reply to post by daryllyn


Well, I was responding to this part of your post:

"that its not really evidence at all"

But now you seem to be saying that it is evidence, so I retract my comments. I agree that the title of this thread is misleading.

I have been around ATS for a while, but if the majority of ATSers need NASA confirmation of something before taking it as fact, then it might be time for me to move on!