It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by snowspirit
Harper can't do anything like that without the OK of the opposition parties, and there are 3 of them. Plus the Queen.
If it turned out that he did sign something without the rest of our government knowing, it would be illegal, and an election would be called. Immediately.
Sort've like Mulroney did with the FTA, after his campaign based on the promise of ignoring the FTA?
They pushed the FTA on Canadians through manipulating the reality of the situation, as per Washington's orders. There was a large populist action against it which resulted in an election. The Canadian people voted against Mulroney and the FTA... then Mulroney pushed it through anyway because of his control over the senate at the time.
Then Chretien came in on the promise of taking down the FTA in its infancy. Two weeks as PM and he changed his tune. Now if that is not treason, then it is surely not democracy.
While Harper signs the Fortress American Agreement with Obama, Canadian food and housing prices jump like crazy. His solution is more connection with the US economy. That was also one of the US's solutions to annexing Canada for almost two centuries.
Gee, score three for our government, the very people we elect to protect our sovereignty
(First two being "military and military industry interoperability" in the 50s and the FTA/NAFTA 20 years ago)
What a nightmare this will become, and it has all been planned for decades. The treason here, goes far beyond just Harper.
Originally posted by Aeons
A nation is composed of people. A company is composed of people. A country has a directive to govern and administrate a nation. A business has a legal obligation to produce profits. A business operates with and in the environment of its resources and employees.
Originally posted by Aeons
I am unconcerned about the concept of the NAU. Sorry. It fails to make my blood boil.
Trade and such will happen. Having a say in it, that I find preferable to the alternatives. And having my elected representatives doing so is one way I can do that.
Originally posted by Fox Molder
And then Canada wonders why Quebec wants out !!!!!
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by Fox Molder
And then Canada wonders why Quebec wants out !!!!!
Quebec wants out because french canadians want quebec to be 100% french
Quebec wanting out is 100% all about language
Originally posted by g146541
reply to post by eArth33lr
Cool i am all for this!
Canada will be inducted by the US, this leads me to believe that Cannucks will be afforded all of the rights and priveledges of a US citizen. The right to bear arms included, welcome to the US, now go buy a gun please.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by Fox Molder
And then Canada wonders why Quebec wants out !!!!!
Quebec wants out because french canadians want quebec to be 100% french
Quebec wanting out is 100% all about language
Originally posted by g146541
reply to post by eArth33lr
Cool i am all for this!
Canada will be inducted by the US, this leads me to believe that Cannucks will be afforded all of the rights and priveledges of a US citizen. The right to bear arms included, welcome to the US, now go buy a gun please.