It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tarifa37
Originally posted by gortex
This is an interesting video , most probably CGI .....but very well done , lots of little details .
Nice blend with the cloud
The objects discharged travel down the appendage on the right of the " craft "
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/ce2f2ee7c840.jpg[/atsimg]
Gut feeling say's CGI but it's the best one I've seen for a while .
The TRUCK looks very cgi fake to me let alone the UFO.
Originally posted by BobAthome
Originally posted by Inca_Roads
I think the sound of the energy build-up/discharge is the most telling aspect of the video. To my ears, the mid- to high-pitched "whoosh" is not in the correct sound envelope, meaning that sound originating from that far away from the microphone of the recording device is subject to certain spatial qualities: distortion, reverberation/echo, distance dropoff, etc. This sound has the wrong "soundspace" for something originating in the atmosphere that distance from the mic. Recall the sound of a clap of thunder in the distance. This sound bears none of those qualities. It sounds far too close and clean, like a sound effect added in post, and of a different auditory "environment" than the other sounds in the video. The visuals are pretty neat, but I think they failed to take the spatial qualities of sound into consideration while fussing with the pretty pictures.
Yes and now start about how the voice's dont really match up.
Originally posted by AnnunakiRageTheChosenPeop
If this is a hoax then it's exactly what Von Braun said would happen because this is obviously no a stand alone video hoax. The dripping orb from the ship is an image/scene that is being constantly repeated in all these videos.
So either it's the ground work for a hoaxed alien invasion to usher in nwo.
Or just an elabortr coordinated hoax.
Or it's real.
None of these are positive.
Originally posted by goatfish
Or it's just a meme that people are repeating in their CG videos. Just like an artist copies things they like from another artist.
Originally posted by Nomad451
You know, I think this video is the final proof that I needed to seriously look into my natural ability to instantly tell when an image is C.G.I.... I should look into doing animation or something.
When I first seen the video, I could literally instantly tell with my own eyes that the "UFO" was not in the sky, and not only that but that it was also a poorly rendered CGI image.
It just LOOKS fake... Re-watch it and focus on the visual quality of the "UFO" compared to the crispness and sharp quality of the cloud it is next to.. The "UFO" looks blurry, the shading looks terrible, and and clearly isn't existing as a solid object in the sky. It almost looks cartoonish.
Go film an airplane flying by a cloud and you'll see the difference between a real object and a CGI one and you'll know what I mean.
It boggles my mind that the majority can't instantly tell either. I guess their insatiable lust for every light and every obvious fake video to be totally real 100% definitive proof of Extraterrestrial activity must blind them to an obvious fake.
Don't get me wrong I seriously believe we are being visited by a non-human intelligence but 99% of all existing video today of things in the sky are fakes and misinterpretations.
There are very very select few videos that fall under the classification of truly "unidentified".... And even then who's to say that we are looking at something "extraterrestrial"?
It's the Wilhelm scream ...
Originally posted by misterhype
reply to post by Merlin Lawndart
i declare CGI because of what happens around the 27 second mark. it looks like it's emerging from the cloud but then it appears to reset within it and emerge officially at about 29 or 30.