It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by Annee
Yeah with a man’s child.
Originally posted by geekyone
reply to post by Annee
I am a woman!
It makes no difference.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by Fox Molder
I am not a liberal, in fact I support the suppression of human rights to benefit society.
The symbiont should be granted the same rights as all men, as the symbiont is self aware, has a soul, a heartbeat and can survive out with the womb stop calling the child the “symbiont”. You are trying to dehumanise the child to justify the murder of the child.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by Fox Molder
Any woman who is using a sperm bank or artificial sperm (a new one to me admittedly) is obviously wanting a child and would not have the child aborted unless it became apparent that the mother might die as a result of the pregnancy.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by Fox Molder
I know this might sound a bit ignorant considering I have admitted to knowing about this topic of synthetic sperm and ovaries, but I disagree with it. sounds too much like man playing God, and I don’t see a need for it.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by kevinunknown
1. Genocide
the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group
You are incorrect about genocide. Words mean things.
2. If you are against abortion, don't get one. Other women's medical condition and choices are NONE of your business.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
The rape argument I think is irrelevant, it’s very rare for a raped woman to become pregnant and even if she dose why should her innocent child have to be murdered. A child is innocent regardless of how he or she is conceived and there is no pressure on the mother to raise the child.
I mean you can all fluff this up all you like, make me out to be some kind of monster for saying that a raped woman should have the child of her rapist. But you are all defending Abortion and using the rape argument to justify your views that if a woman chooses to she can kill her child anytime in the first 24 weeks of her pregnancy.
Let’s take the rape out of the argument, say some 23 year old girl goes out and has casual sex as a result of this she becomes pregnant, the birth of this child is drastically going to change her life. So she thinks about this for 10 weeks and then goes for a abortion because this child is going to be such a inconvenience. That is probably the reality of 98% of all abortions, its murder for connivance do you all defend that.
The “What if its rape” argument is just a way for the evil people who defend abortion to make the righteous amongst us who defend a Childs right to life appear to be a evil as they are. I am not condoning rape, but you are using the act of rape to condone the murder of children. That makes you the monster not me.