It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hauling the kid out in cuffs is a little on the extreme side in my humble opinion, but I can see where a pic of a gun going off and words "teacher's must die" might be cause for serious concern. If no action at all is taken, then the kid turns around and pulls a Columbine, then everybody would be going nuts on the authorities as well. This was a situation that had no easy answers imho.
Originally posted by crimvelvet
reply to post by DimensionalDetective
Hauling the kid out in cuffs is a little on the extreme side in my humble opinion, but I can see where a pic of a gun going off and words "teacher's must die" might be cause for serious concern. If no action at all is taken, then the kid turns around and pulls a Columbine, then everybody would be going nuts on the authorities as well. This was a situation that had no easy answers imho.
The correct way to handle it is for the parents, school and perhaps the authorities to sit down and TALK! The kid did not kill or harm anyone.
Second he is already under professional care AGAIN the authorities/schools should have TALKED to the one person who might have had a clue as to the correct way to handle this - the DOCTOR.
SHEESH,
Kids have anger and feelings of hostility all the time, are we going to arrest every single kid or person who says, "I am so angry I could kill you" ????
That is all this is, the same type of expression only in pictures by a child who had no other way to express his anger harmlessly.
Originally posted by wayno
If there ever was an argument for cutting back spending on excessive security and control, this is it.
Crim, Hi, are you privy to more than anyone else on the net?
Originally posted by crimvelvet
reply to post by something wicked
Crim, Hi, are you privy to more than anyone else on the net?
No, but I work with lots of different little kids in this age range every week. I deal with over 2000 different little kids a year and I have to keep control of those kids in a potentially dangerous situation.
There is NOTHING you can tell me that will convince me a young child should be dragged from his home in hand cuffs in the dead of night. That the government has THE RIGHT to traumatize a child in this manner when no law was broken.
Do not allow the child to go back to school - sure.
Require psychiatric examination by a different state appointed doctor -sure
Traumatize the child and parents when a psychiatric problem is already KNOWN to exist - HELL NO!
I have had a frantic neighbor, new to the neighborhood, ask me to take her to school to pick up her child who was behaving a Heck of a lot worse than this kid - setting fire to her desk, to be exact. I then took her and the child to her psychiatrist. Why the heck wasn't the same method applied here?edit on 23-2-2011 by crimvelvet because: fumble fingers
I repeat, do you have any other evidence about this story, yes or no? You don't do you? You are reacting to a story without having the full facts, are you not?
hey told her they were arresting him and then handcuffed him and hauled him away in a patrol car. His mother says she begged police to let her drive her son to the police department and to let her stay with him through the booking process but they refused.
They put him in a cell, took his mug shot and fingerprinted him. He says he thought he was going to jail and would never be able to go home again.
According to the police report, "Tim" explained he made the drawing to release anger and would never hurt teachers or anyone. At first school officials did not want to press charges, but changed their mind when police called them later that night. A juvenile assessment report shows he's never been in legal trouble before and is at low risk to reoffend.
He's charged with a third degree misdemeanor, interfering with staff and students at an educational facility. The system says it's doing what's in the best interest of the child. But Tim's therapist says handcuffing an 11-year-old and putting him in a cell over something like this is "quite an overreaction" and does much more harm than good. www.kdvr.com...
...Finished with the drawing, he was about to throw it out, when it was seen by his teacher. The boy was sent to the principal's office, but the school was aware of his condition and that appeared to be the end of it, his parents said....
A police report indicates "Tim" admitted to drawing the picture, but insisted he would never hurt anyone, especially a teacher. He had never been in any kind of legal trouble before.
He was charged with interfering with staff and students at an educational facility, a third degree misdemeanor.
"It's bizarre to me that they would behave this way," Dr. Patrick Bacon, the boy's therapist....
www.nydailynews.com...
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Were you the kid who drew wieners on everything?
Originally posted by crimvelvet
reply to post by something wicked
I repeat, do you have any other evidence about this story, yes or no? You don't do you? You are reacting to a story without having the full facts, are you not?
HERE ARE THE FACTS: