It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Maybe this will help, but I don't think it has enough detail.
Originally posted by defiler
A height data map or topology map from that place(on the moon) would be be very nice, then we will know for sure if its uphill or downhill.
Looking at the original image, I don't think they look like cylinders, is as simple as that.
Originally posted by Silverlok
since you are a moderator I would respectfully request a reply to your observation on "cylinders" in this thread.
Because it's a digital and simplified representation of myself, like what I write on ATS.
Also I am extremely curious WHY you chose that particular avatar?
It doesn't look different from other groups of rocks. I think it was a larger rock that rolled down hill (and not up hill, like some people apparently thought) and stopped against a group of smaller rocks that were at the end of the slope.
I am not against a natural origin but please explain to me HOW this object is like natural rock to you ?
Originally posted by Versa
If the anomaly was some sort of vehicle/rover thing wouldn't if of squashed the rocks that I've indicated with an arrow into the ground?
Originally posted by Pimander
Do we know when the rocks landed there? We don't even know what the object(s) are yet do we? Or have I missed something (long thread)?
Originally posted by Versa
they would of made at least some sort of crater where the track is or disturbed the tracks somehow, which they don't appear to have done...
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Versa
they would of made at least some sort of crater where the track is or disturbed the tracks somehow, which they don't appear to have done...
one of the main things the no Apollo believers use as 'proof' is no crater under the landers
Originally posted by zorgon
Rocks don't fall from the sky and 'land' gently on the surface... at least not that I have seen...
and rocks the size of a house do not role up inclines like the one in the Lunar Orbiter shot..
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Versa
they would of made at least some sort of crater where the track is or disturbed the tracks somehow, which they don't appear to have done...
one of the main things the no Apollo believers use as 'proof' is no crater under the landers
Originally posted by ArMaP
The brighter areas are the sides of the rille that are facing the Sun, wouldn't that make those areas as being the lower ones (seeing that you used the "negative" image) while the the areas in the shadow would appear as higher areas?
Originally posted by defiler
The displacement map uses an algorithm that shows the whites as high ground and the grays or blacks as low ground.
Could you do that you a known area so we can see if it works?
Thanks in advance.
Originally posted by Pimander
Originally posted by zorgon one of the main things the no Apollo believers use as 'proof' is no crater under the landers
Not fair. You have to explain to Versa why that is a red herring rather than just laugh at him you big sword bearing bully