It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by roguetechie
I love all the people in this thread talking about stuff that is SO OUT OF THEIR DEPTH it's quite frankly amusing.
For those of you shooting your mouth off about what stuxnet can or can't do... maybe a good first step would be looking up what a PLC is and realizing they are in everything from milling machines to dairy farm equipment to auto factories to power plants and infrastructure of ALL KINDS!
Next you ought to maybe look into how easy those siemens codes are to get through social engineering.
Next you ought to... Actually Never Mind. Because y'all still really just plain don't get it and make all us CT types look and sound really stupid when you open your mouths and insert your digital feet.
I'd love to see one of these threads that doesn't go down the tubes of internet braggadacio and ill educated speculation JUST ONCE.
Topiary, an online activist affiliated with the 4-chan-spawned internet coalition, claimed on Twitter to have gained possession of the malware. He said: "Anonymous is now in possession of Stuxnet – problem, officer?"
Later, another Twitter account affiliated with Anonymous posted links to what purported to be a partial decompile of Stuxnet.
Snorre Fagerland, a senior threat researcher at Norman, writes in a Twitter update: "Anonymous only have Stuxnet binaries and disassembly. Not the original source."
Originally posted by roguetechie
I love all the people in this thread talking about stuff that is SO OUT OF THEIR DEPTH .......
y'all.....
Originally posted by purplemer
Originally posted by kwakakev
Something does not sound right here at all. Why would Anon target Iran with Stuxnet when Iran has already been hit with it? The Anon that surfaced on the cablegate release was standing for the people and after the large multinational companies. This stinks of a false flag, hoax or some other diversion to me. I guess that is one thing with the name Anon as it could be anyone, mainly someone who does not want to be known. The enemies of Iran are already well known.edit on 14-2-2011 by kwakakev because: spelling 'of'
you read it wrong anon never targerted iran. however they now have a copy of the code that was used to attack iran.
kx