It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
Planets dont have elliptical orbits like comets. It would be nice to know the length in earth years of its orbit around the sun (esp if 3500-3600 yrs). I guess it doesnt matter what it is called (based on it's orbit) if it is planetary size (and gravity) and it shows up near our orbit, then we're in for a wild ride (pole shift, attendant winds and tsunamis, and temporary stoppage of the earth's rotation, etc).edit on 14-2-2011 by CosmicCitizen because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by QuantumDisciple
reply to post by daveyboy1991
Look up "long period comets" to get a little insight on how the Sun can have a gravitational effect on objects at great distance.
Speaking of which, Halley's Comet goes almost out to Pluto and gets back here in 74-79 years. 3500 year orbit from the Oort Cloud is not unreasonable...
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by QuantumDisciple
I'm talking about a Chinese "word". Your the one who's jumping to conclusions about the Chinese.
Originally posted by arollingstone
This planet does not even correspond at all with the details that Sitchin provided. Plus the only source cited by the OP was the Daily Mail - this is one of the least credible sources in Britain.
Originally posted by andradez
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
Planets dont have elliptical orbits like comets. It would be nice to know the length in earth years of its orbit around the sun (esp if 3500-3600 yrs). I guess it doesnt matter what it is called (based on it's orbit) if it is planetary size (and gravity) and it shows up near our orbit, then we're in for a wild ride (pole shift, attendant winds and tsunamis, and temporary stoppage of the earth's rotation, etc).edit on 14-2-2011 by CosmicCitizen because: (no reason given)
Hello to All, I am new and english is not my primary language so forgive me any errors.
I know my source may not be reliable but according to Ramatis, The Planet called Nibiru, Planet X , etc..., does not belong to the solar system.
Its orbit takes 12.000 years and it goes around a brown dwarf that is not yet discovered and this brown dwarf is aproximately 3 light years away.
The speed of the earth going around the sun is roughly 107.000 Km per hour.
The escape velocity for solar system must be above 70 Km per second depending on where you are, but the planet Ramatis talks about is
going incredibly fast, its speed is above 300 Km per second and its perpendicular orbit reaches 3 or more light years. When this planet approaches the solar system it speeds up even more. That is why Mr. Harrington (deceased astronomer who first detected the planet) said The planet had traveled 43 billion miles in just 8 years.
Ramatis also said that cientists would be uncertain about the nature of the celestial body, thinking it is a comet or gas planet, because commom belief states that a planet cannot exist outside a solar system which is wrong.
Ramatis also said the Magnetic Field of the planet is enormous and will start affecting even more all the planets when it reaches the Kuiper Belt.
Ramatis also said the Magnetic Field of the planet is enormous and will start affecting even more all the planets when it reaches the Kuiper Belt.
Originally posted by QuantumDisciple
reply to post by CLPrime
Do all planets orbit the Sun at the same velocity? How did you get that figure?
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
FFS.. some of you are really desperate to hear ANYTHING about Nibiru/Planet X/Whatever, it seems like you're waiting for the end of the world. To the point of relating anything to Nibiru.
A new star found? 100% proof it is Nibiru! A comet is flying through our system? Nibiru for sure!
Anyways, about the article..
A planet "thousands of times further from the Sun than Earth", as the article states, is not a planet that could possibly orbit around the Sun. Our Sun's gravitational pull simply doesn't reach that far.
This is our Solar System:
Look at the distance between Earth and the Sun.. now multiply that by a thousand (possibly thousands). Surely that isn't anywhere around the Sun's gravitational pull.
edit on 14-2-2011 by IsraeliGuy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by daveyboy1991
The daily mail is one of the only newspapers that is credible. Alongside with the independant and guardian. You just gotta look at papers such as the sun and the daily star... THey have no reason to lie
Originally posted by QuantumDisciple
reply to post by CLPrime
Well there you have it. Sounds like Nibiru can go in the Hoax bin. Should have known better when the Sumarian's best description of Uranus was "Mas Seeg" or "Much Green."
Originally posted by DreamerOracle
It's not only Suns that have gravity....in fact it could be part of a "thread" Dark Matter.
Dark matter has Mass (Gravity) therefor it is logical that being part of a thread planets and stars may be held in regions of space where the pull from a star is none existent or in the low end of the scale(Brown Dwarf).
So orbiting our sun.....No orbiting Our solar system as its part of our thread.....yes.
Originally posted by arollingstone
LOL! I really hope this is a sarcastic comment, though it's hard to tell! The Guardian is in another league mate. The Daily Mail is a broadsheet tabloid, they do not report news or reliable information - they report nonsense. They have many, many agendas - most of these revolve around creating fear over Gypsies, Muslims, Murders, etc. whilst focusing on celebrity gossip. Therefore, they have many reasons to lie - they do not have any responsibility to print the truth or facts and rarely do. Please do not mislead anyone into believing otherwise. This is literally one of the least credible sources of information in the UK after the Sun.
Proof: en.wikipedia.org...
edit on 14-2-2011 by arollingstone because: (no reason given)edit on 14-2-2011 by arollingstone because: reducing quotes