It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by polarwarrior
Originally posted by kroms33
I want to stay on topic here, it is a very interesting thread. My problem is this, much of an awakening wouldn't be reported in news outlets... it would sound too tabloid.
That's a good point. The influx of new energies surrounding cycles transitions would mainly effect people from within, for most people an awakening is something private that they don't go screaming from rooftops.
But, energy changes causing mass awakening will change collective behavior and percolate into physical world changes/events.
If you attempted to gauge how it was going by lets say 3rd eye perception of the matrix fields, then if you were awakening while observing then your own increasing perception as your pineal gains more functioning may skew your ability to make comparisons with the past. So the only way to really know would be to be stagnant in your own growth and perception so as to not skew the observation by changes occurring in your own microcosm.
So we can use physical events instead, often reported in news media(although be careful of msm doesn't try to skew perception either) to gauge how the transition is effecting the husk that is the physical world then gauge how influx is effecting the interrelated energy streams, all is interconnected so all will show change but for some its easier to see than others. Also some people cant use extra sensory types of perception and they shouldn't be left in the dark.
Also, trying to estimate how things are going by how many people claim to awakening on a truth seekers website or how a few peoples individual experiences on such a site are going can be very inaccurate. There are almost 7 billion of us here.
There are other projects out there such a princeton's GCP attempting to measure such changes. I'm not in any way at all saying "don't try to watch it all in meditation", as that is a very good way too see things changing, but understand that its also the hardest to get accuracy for an unenlightened being, esspecially when they are awakening.
edit on 13-2-2011 by polarwarrior because: (no reason given)edit on 13-2-2011 by polarwarrior because: (no reason given)
If the Pope had anything to do with it... we probably have the wrong date no matter what.
Originally posted by SonOfTheLawOfOne
You're basing this thread on Calleman's (and possibly Lungold's) interpretation of the Mayan Calendar... what you are saying is that this is the final stage that takes us to the end of the 5th Sun. There is much debate on whether this date is correct or not (October 28th, 2011), even though Calleman makes a good argument, the Mayans themselves still stand by the 12/23/2012 date.
If you go by the 2012 date, we have not finished the cycle of Ethics yet, which is still playing itself out as we speak, as observed by the Egyptian and Tunisian ousting of corruption - ie a change in consciousness that is ridding unethical behavior. This will continue according to the 2012 date. The Ethics cycle would end 260 days before December 23, 2012 which would take us to around April 7th, 2012. That could be the actual date we move into the new Galactic cycle of consciousness.
What you have to consider is that when we began the Gregorian calendar, the Pope at the time had just come into possession of the Mayan codices and calendars, and found that they were far more accurate than the Jovian calendars. This is why the 2012 date is the one that has become more popular is because it precisely aligns with the expected moment that the Mayan calendar arrives at the end of the 5th Sun cycle, which is supposed to also be on the winter equinox. There is also an expected alignment with the galactic center in the viewable horizon, which does not occur on 10/28/2011 and therefore, does not have any significance to the Mayans, whom worshiped the center of the galaxy.
This is why I would not put too much stock into Calleman's date... even he says "if I'm right" in his texts, over and over again. I don't see how his date has any significance in the same way as I just mentioned compared to 2012. I also don't believe we have finished the Ethics cycle, and that we are still firmly planted in it watching it unfold.
While I don't disagree with the idea of this thread, I think that you may be over reaching a bit by saying the new cycle starts now because there is still no certainty on the 10/28/2011 date that Calleman predicts.
I'm sticking with 12/23/2012 and will watch to see what happens after April 2012, which is when things are supposed to change in a major way.
S&F for the effort.
~Namaste
Originally posted by Truther101
reply to post by Xcalibur254
Following the first underworld, we have th second which begins 820 million years ago. Calleman correlates this to the emergence of complex life. First off, one would think the emergence of life in general would be more important, but let's ignore that for now. The date Calleman gives does not match up with the emergence of complex life. The Cambrian explosion did not occur until 530 million years ago.
820 Mya is the END OF DAY 7 & 1st CYCLE, BEGGINNING OF DAY 1, 2nd CYCLE. He states that the first live cell evolved DURING Day 7 of 1st cycle(ends at 820 Mya). According to modern science, 1.0-2.1 billion years ago is when Prokaryote evolved to Eukaryote.
Eukaryote
5 billion years ago during Day 5 of the 1st Cycle Life emerged from the oceans to the shores. but during Day 6(about 4.2 Billion years ago), disasters wiped out 97 percent of life.
Timeline
The next Underworld comes at 41 million years ago, with the emergence of "monkeys". Presently the oldest monkey we have found comes from 35 million years ago, and we have apes going back to the early Tertiary period.
During the last Million years of the last day of the 2nd(Mammalian) cycle is when the first monkeys began to appear going into the 3rd (Familial) Cycle.
Primates
However, one would think that the emergence of mammals in general or the death of non-avian dinosaurs would be more important, but once again these don't fit in with Calleman's theory.
Correction. The 2nd Cycle is called the "MAMMALIAN CYCLE" in which During Day 5 is when the first MAMMALS emerge. 220-215 Mya(Mesozoic Era). (PLEASE NOTE: Calleman states that every 5th day of each cycle is the day when one of the most greatest enlightenments occur) Also in which during Day 7 of the 2nd Cycle is when the death of the Non-avian Dinosaurs occured.
Let's move on to the next at 2,050,000 years ago. This is correlated to humans. That's all Calleman gives us is the vague term humans. Even with a very general term, Calleman is still wrong. The oldest hominid is 7 million years old, Australopithecus is 3-4 millions years old, the genus Homo is 2.5 million years old,
The hominids and Australopithecus are still classified as primates/monkeys/Apes etc. arose during the last day of the Familial Consciouness cycle.
Australopithecus
Calleman refers "humans" to "Homo-sapiens" in which emerged during the first day of the 4th(Tribal) cycle. 2 Mya.
Homo-Genus
and speech emerges in 100500 B.C.
The origins of speech still to this day is under debate.
Origin of Language
You also skipped one of the most important cycles, the 5th Cultural Consciousness cycle. in which agriculture and reasoning developed and Hunter-gatherers emerged
Hunter-Gatherer
4th Millennium BC
The next, June 16th, 3115 BC is supposed to mark the beginning of writing. There is no clear cut date that separates proto-writing (which had existed for a long time before writing) and writing. It was a gradual process and one cannot point to a specific date where they were clearly different.
Correction. The 6th Cycle(National, 3115BC) is supposed to mark the beginning of the when the first nation arrises, AKA ANCIENT EGYPT founded by King Menes
Ancient Egypt
Ironically, during the first years of the 5th Day(I WILL REPEAT: Calleman states that every 5th day of each cycle is the day when one of the most greatest enlightenments occur) Is when the fall of Rome occurs.
Following this Calleman places the start of industrialism in 1755. He gives absolutely no reason as for why this is so. He doesn't point out any specific innovations or anything, he just simply states it is so.
Correction. He states that the industrial revolution begins in Europe. In which you can find in the link below all the innovations that occured in Europe at the time.
Industrial Revolution-Britain
Finally we come to the 8th Underworld starting on January 5, 1999. This is supposed to mark the start of the IT Revolution, however anyone who was alive before this date knows that the IT Revolution started before 1999. If it hadn't the Y2K bug wouldn't have been such a big deal.
Y2KCorrection. He does not state that the IT revolution occurs in 1999. He SPECIFICALLY states that during the first years of Day 7 of the 7th Cycle is when www.com emerges AKA the IT Revolution.
In which the begginning of the 8th Cycle (Ethics) 1999, is when the Y2K frenzy occured. And Y2K was BIG. There were actual companies that were made to specifically back up all their data on paper.
So, there you have it. Not once is Calleman able to connect the start of his Underworlds to actual events. He has to rely on vagaries and random events to get his theory to fit. When you're dealing with history any date you choose is bound to be close to some date of importance. Yet, when one looks at Calleman's theory in depth one must ask why these dates don't correspond to the most important events that lead to human evolution and why many of his claims are so vague.
So there YOU have it, obviously your so in depth in debunking his theory as false, when in reality you skip all thats important and try to point out every inch of imperfection in his theory when i just proved that his dates do correspond to very important events.
And let me add that most events that have occurred before the discovery of Ancient Egypt are still under debate. From the origins of writing, to the destruction of non avian dinosaurs.
. With the research i have performed, Calleman's dates prove to be on point. Seriously, all i am trying to do with this thread is put to light and open up peoples minds to different ideas, possibilities, and knowledge due to the hard times that are to come,
Originally posted by Truther101
reply to post by TheIrvy
Its kind of ironic how the last day starts in November and the prophet Baba Vanga predicted WW3 to begin in November!! Baba Vanga: World War 3 - less then 1 month to go
Originally posted by ZiggyMojo
It's always he said she said. Nobody, in my opinion, can be taken as being more credible than anyone else. Unless there is solid evidence or proof, nothing can really be verified as truth. So I guess we'll just have to wait until that date. Thank you for letting us know that something might happen, if it doesn't I won't be surprised. If it does, I still won't be surprised.
Originally posted by Tollon
reply to post by Truther101
Too bad I can't take you seriously when you in the same thread state that the Baba Vanga prophecy should in some way prove your point:
Originally posted by Truther101
reply to post by TheIrvy
Its kind of ironic how the last day starts in November and the prophet Baba Vanga predicted WW3 to begin in November!! Baba Vanga: World War 3 - less then 1 month to go
Originally posted by TheIrvy
Closer than that, this past year we've been living through the 6th night, but that's coming to an end at the start of November, when the 7th day will begin, a day of rest before the start of the 9th stage. Interestingly, this coincides with a dip in both the timewave curve and the webbot's graph.
That prophecy was obviously wrong.
What I think will happen here is that you try to link every event that occurs worldwide to support your theory (which is basically Calleman's theory anyway).
And to round this up I will quote yet another poster from your previous thread that said it pretty well:
Originally posted by ZiggyMojo
It's always he said she said. Nobody, in my opinion, can be taken as being more credible than anyone else. Unless there is solid evidence or proof, nothing can really be verified as truth. So I guess we'll just have to wait until that date. Thank you for letting us know that something might happen, if it doesn't I won't be surprised. If it does, I still won't be surprised.
So, please go ahead and present all "proof" you have here. Very little of it is hard fact and thus we can only wait and see how it turns out to end up.
Cheers for letting us all know what you think but I can't say I will follow this thread to the end.
I'll just wait and see...
Originally posted by Truther101
The purpose of this thread is to track events that occur on, around and during the next 260 days that lead up to October 28, 2011, in which we complete the Universal Consciousness cycle, in which would assist with and will definitely lead up to the "approving" or "disapproving" of this theory.
Originally posted by TM62
What about the 13 heavens? Does anyone know anything about these Gods and Goddesses, there are 13 and each oversees one of the 13 cycles (7days and 6 nights). So do these directly influence daily events with that day?
More descriptively the Mayan Long Count calendar consists of 13 Baktuns, and each Baktun has corresponded to a Heaven. Maybe these Gods and Goddesses will play an important part influencing our events.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/3a83c71f9a1a.gif[/atsimg]
Caan is divided into thirteen levels, represented graphically by a pyramid with six steps located in the east, six in the west and a seventh step acting as a pinnacle in the center of the cosmos. The thirteen levels are governed by Oxlahuntiku gods, also considered as a single god. Not all their full names and glyphs known. What has been possible to decipher is that these celestial gods interrelate closely with the inhabitants of the earth as with the gods of the underworld.