It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cosmic.Artifact
Hitler wasn't the anti-Christ... he was "an" anti-Christ.
Originally posted by Cosmic.Artifact
reply to post by hawaii50th
yeah I have not read much of that part of the book of wisdom but when I did read it, it sounded to me like what I stated... an Ideology just as is on the rise and has been steady since Darwin... anyone who denounces the Law of God and creates new Laws which others believe (like Hitler did) is an anti-Christ (hence it is ok to kill). I think of it as real-time, a living book and not any particular point in the future when this is going to happen to all humankind at the same time, but to individuals in their own time.
from what I have read of the Book I have read alone like a mystery novel... other opinions cloud its message until one get's it.
edit on 2/13/2011 by Cosmic.Artifact because: off topic rambling about Moses
Originally posted by hawaii50th
Originally posted by mrphilosophias
reply to post by Noncompatible
How is that you have come to possess two truths now, when before you implied that the only truth, is that there is no truth. Yet now you are implying that there are many more truths than just this one. So what is truth? Are their non-truths? Can I suggest that two contradictory notions are true in the same sense and at the same time? Is there an objective reality or a Most Perfect perspective of the Universe? I think that you have not taken the time to challenge yourself to ask more questions and think more critically about the premises which you so boldly proclaim as truth, or you may realize too late that what you believed was truth, was really quite the opposite.
Jesus is the Way, the Life, and the Truth, no man comes to the Father but through Him. Praise, glory, honor and thanksgiving belong to the Lamb of God, who was slain as the Perfect Atoning sacrifice for the sins of the world: He is risen!
In Love and Service,
Matthew
edit on 13-2-2011 by mrphilosophias because: (no reason given)
To mrphilosophias, you hit the nail right on the head.
Originally posted by Noncompatible
Originally posted by hawaii50th
Originally posted by mrphilosophias
reply to post by Noncompatible
How is that you have come to possess two truths now, when before you implied that the only truth, is that there is no truth. Yet now you are implying that there are many more truths than just this one. So what is truth? Are their non-truths? Can I suggest that two contradictory notions are true in the same sense and at the same time? Is there an objective reality or a Most Perfect perspective of the Universe? I think that you have not taken the time to challenge yourself to ask more questions and think more critically about the premises which you so boldly proclaim as truth, or you may realize too late that what you believed was truth, was really quite the opposite.
Jesus is the Way, the Life, and the Truth, no man comes to the Father but through Him. Praise, glory, honor and thanksgiving belong to the Lamb of God, who was slain as the Perfect Atoning sacrifice for the sins of the world: He is risen!
In Love and Service,
Matthew
edit on 13-2-2011 by mrphilosophias because: (no reason given)
To mrphilosophias, you hit the nail right on the head.
Yes he has indeed. You have a belief in a "truth". I do not, that is my "truth". Others disagree with both "truths".
I can only conclude from this that the only truth is..there is no truth beside the meaning we attach to it.
Believe as you will, that does not make it truth.
And round and round we go.
edit on 13-2-2011 by Noncompatible because: (no reason given)edit on 13-2-2011 by Noncompatible because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Cosmic.Artifact
reply to post by hawaii50th
that's interesting too, never got too deep into the end times stuff yet... I will look into it though I read the KJV when I do.
I have heard it said that the seas mean the multitudes of people ?
I do understand where Patmos was though and I believe it to be a "state of mind" rather than a specific place... and it was very lonely like a deserted island.
Revelations is a bit weird... I like the most the Gospels where Jesus like the Jedi totally slain the competition
Originally posted by hawaii50th
Yes you are correct in your assumption that the seas are the multitudes and sometimes there are other meanings, it all depends on the context of what is being referred to. Another reference to people is, sands of the sea, in this case offspring.
As for Patmos, it is a small Greek island in the Aegean Sea, where John the apostle was exiled. The Revelation of Jesus Christ was given to him on this island,
In September 2008, the municipality of Patmos refused landing to a group of undocumented refugees from Afghanistan and Iraq. On the weekend of September 19, 2008, about 133 refugees were rescued. About half of the refugees were infants and minors. The refugees were taken to Patmos, the nearest municipality, for processing and care. The administration refused them permission to land. Eventually they were sent to the island of Leros where they were processed and given humanitarian aid. Local authorities justified their action by contrasting it to alleged practices elsewhere in the EU: "Malta sinks their boats and Italy lets them drown", local leaders claimed.
Originally posted by hawaii50th
How can a nonbeliever believe in a Christian truth? Unless that nonbeliever comes to believe and have faith in the One that has the truth. It is impossible to find the truth for the nonbeliever.
Originally posted by Noncompatible
Originally posted by hawaii50th
How can a nonbeliever believe in a Christian truth? Unless that nonbeliever comes to believe and have faith in the One that has the truth. It is impossible to find the truth for the nonbeliever.
Hence proving there is nothing but "truth" as an interpretation. As it is impossible to verify your "truth" without belief.
And why is a christian truth superior to a non-christian one?
Because you say so ?
Because you believe it ?
The only truth is there is no truth...only facts, fiction and reality.
The notion of "mine is the only truth" is the real evil in the world, not an antichrist but an anti-tolerance and an unwillingness to unstrap the yoke of ignorance and really think.
Religion is a key contributor to this fact, most all religions not just yours. That and what appears to be an innate desire for everyone to believe they are right and anyone who disagrees does not know the "truth".
My "truth" differs from yours, fine. I am happy to share my "truth". So it seems are you, however I simply feel you're mistaken. You believe, it would seem, I'm damned unless I "find your truth".
Big difference and distinctly anti-tolerant.edit on 13-2-2011 by Noncompatible because: (no reason given)
to really think about what ? a new truth new laws and new philosophies ? what is your truth...
Originally posted by Noncompatible
The notion of "mine is the only truth" is the real evil in the world, not an antichrist but an anti-tolerance and an unwillingness to unstrap the yoke of ignorance and really think.
ah the truth is so fleeting... why not try with a smaller religious sect then instead of the largest ? Jediism only has about half million followers via census but you are still not doing a very good job convincing this lowly Jedi.
Religion is a key contributor to this fact, most all religions not just yours. That and what appears to be an innate desire for everyone to believe they are right and anyone who disagrees does not know the "truth"
then what is your truth ? can you rewrite history for us in a nutshell without theism existing ? I am really curious to see where this fantasy leads.... maybe you can write a book or make a movie.
My "truth" differs from yours, fine. I am happy to share my "truth". So it seems are you, however I simply feel you're mistaken. You believe, it would seem, I'm damned unless I "find your truth"
Originally posted by hawaii50th
Did I say you are damned, that's your assessment about yourself not mine.
As for religion, it is man made, Christianity is not man made religion, it is the Word of God, and that Word of God became flesh. God's Word has no flaws, where as man made religion does. There is no way possible for a nonbeliever to get this, and that's because in order to understand a person must open his or her heart to The Lord for His understanding to manifest, it's like a third eye to the soul and mind that opens and begins to see and understand.
I make no judgment on you and what you choose or what you believe in. You challenge me and I will defend the Word of the Lord. I just stand for the truth in the Word of the Lord, and that's because I have gone through a lot and experienced a lot in my walk. I have a long way to go, I will never claim to be perfect, there is no one on this earth that is, there was only One that was perfect, and He ascended up to heaven and one day He will return.
Thus while absolute truths may be hard to come by, and difficult to agree upon, some amount of truths are generally required for a properly functioning society. Whether these truths are absolute or universal is a matter that has been and will likely continue to be debated.
An absolute truth, sometimes called a universal truth, is an unalterable and permanent fact. The concept of absolute truths - what they are and whether they exist - has been debated among many different groups of people. Philosophers have waded in the muck of defining absolute truth for millennia. For example, Plato believed that absolute truth existed, but that truth on earth was merely a shadow of great forms of absolute truth existing in the universe. Alternatively, many believe in relative truths, where facts may vary depending on the circumstances.
t’s difficult to disprove the concept of absolute truth, since saying that there are no absolute truths - that it is absolutely true that no absolute truth exists - is itself an absolute truth.
In logic, or the consideration of valid arguments, a proposition is said to have universality if it can be conceived as being true in all possible contexts without creating a contradiction. Some philosophers have referred to such propositions as universalizable. Truth is considered to be universal if it is valid in all times and places. In this case, it is seen as eternal or as absolute. The relativist conception denies the existence of some or all universal truths, particularly ethical ones (through moral relativism). Mathematics is a field in which those truths discovered, in relation to the field of mathematics, are typically considerered of universal scope. Usage of the word truth has various domains of application, relativism does not necessarily apply to all of them. This is not to say that universality is limited to mathematics for there exists a large number of people who apply the standard to philosophy, theology and beyond.
Slavish devotion to the "one true path" is still the greatest form of evil in existence. As always that is my personal truth.
Originally posted by rusethorcain
reply to post by Noncompatible
Slavish devotion to the "one true path" is still the greatest form of evil in existence. As always that is my personal truth.
And I disagree with your "truth" since I know there are FAR worse and more pervasive, destructive forms of evil than slavish devotion to one true path.
The worst evil I might argue is schizophrenic and cannot maintain consistency in emotion or devotion.
Evil for evil's own sake. Causing pain to enjoy the suffering of others is a greater evil in my book and it is a real and pervasive problem. To dismiss the existence of actual evil claiming some dogma has inflicted more damage is merely self righteous indignation. Putting a bag over truths head and allowing real evil to escape.
That is my personal truth.
Originally posted by Noncompatible
Originally posted by hawaii50th
Did I say you are damned, that's your assessment about yourself not mine.
As for religion, it is man made, Christianity is not man made religion, it is the Word of God, and that Word of God became flesh. God's Word has no flaws, where as man made religion does. There is no way possible for a nonbeliever to get this, and that's because in order to understand a person must open his or her heart to The Lord for His understanding to manifest, it's like a third eye to the soul and mind that opens and begins to see and understand.
I make no judgment on you and what you choose or what you believe in. You challenge me and I will defend the Word of the Lord. I just stand for the truth in the Word of the Lord, and that's because I have gone through a lot and experienced a lot in my walk. I have a long way to go, I will never claim to be perfect, there is no one on this earth that is, there was only One that was perfect, and He ascended up to heaven and one day He will return.
So in a nutshell. I must believe in your truth to know the truth. And though you do not judge me, you will defend your truth against me if I question or doubt it.
Sounds about right.
Evil in the name of good seems not to impinge on your awareness
It appears good and evil are simply matters of perspective also.
The original topic being the "antichrist" makes this even more apparent since it displays mans willingness to apportion blame anywhere and everywhere rather than accept we are responsible for our own mess.
Originally posted by Noncompatible
Originally posted by rusethorcain
reply to post by Noncompatible
Slavish devotion to the "one true path" is still the greatest form of evil in existence. As always that is my personal truth.
And I disagree with your "truth" since I know there are FAR worse and more pervasive, destructive forms of evil than slavish devotion to one true path.
The worst evil I might argue is schizophrenic and cannot maintain consistency in emotion or devotion.
Evil for evil's own sake. Causing pain to enjoy the suffering of others is a greater evil in my book and it is a real and pervasive problem. To dismiss the existence of actual evil claiming some dogma has inflicted more damage is merely self righteous indignation. Putting a bag over truths head and allowing real evil to escape.
That is my personal truth.
Evil in the name of good seems not to impinge on your awareness. It is the bane of mankind that providing one knows "the truth" and is righteous then one apparently can relabel evil as "for the greater good" at best and at worst blame it on a supernatural entity.
It appears good and evil are simply matters of perspective also.
The original topic being the "antichrist" makes this even more apparent since it displays mans willingness to apportion blame anywhere and everywhere rather than accept we are responsible for our own mess.