It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zroth
The west kills the innocent in the name of progress and freedom. The empire has killed more than helped in every war and has no right to judge any other nation.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by zroth
The west kills the innocent in the name of progress and freedom. The empire has killed more than helped in every war and has no right to judge any other nation.
Yet, you, as an individual, feel that you have the right to judge a country.
If you can judge a country, why can't other countries judge as well? You are so against western culture, yet everything you have is brought about by western culture.
Hypocritical, much?
judge
noun, verb, judged, judg·ing. –noun
1. a public officer authorized to hear and decide cases in a court of law; a magistrate charged with the administration of justice.
2. a person appointed to decide in any competition, contest, or matter at issue; authorized arbiter:
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by zroth
What facts? Opinions, and biased ones at that, perhaps, but no facts.
But hey, bash away! America the evil, greedy greed-head place, the terrible country
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by zroth
Neato-keen captain!
I guess we can't judge any other country. We should just bomb the snot out of any country that tries to attack us. I mean, that'll take much of the guess-work out of it. Keep foreign relations simple enough. Let's not try to change some of their more barbaric practices.
Just shewt 'em!
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
Here is why muslims don't deserve - or rather are incapable of democracy! - Islam is a savage, brutal, backward, inhuman and thoroughly evil ideology worse by far than nazism, or communism -that is why brutal corrupt dictators are needed to keep them in line.
By now any sane human being of 21st century should realize that the religion of Islam is the main source of Islamic terrorism happening today around the world. But sadly, majority of gullible people (Muslim and non-Muslims) tend to ask questions: Does the Islam have anything to do with Terrorism? More precisely—does the Qur’an anyway responsible for Islamic terrorism, or Islamic suicide bombings? Some hypocritical western educated so called moderate Muslims now started to blame Hadiths (only) for Islamic terrorism/suicide bombings etc. and they are hypocritically claiming that Quran is totally innocent of this crime.
These neo-islamists also claim that for all these Islamic suicide bombings and Islamic terrorism—it is the Sunnah (Ahadiths or traditions left by the Prophet Muhammad) which should be blamed, and not the Holy Quran. In this faulty or erroneous line of thinking they got their illusionary vision that, if hadiths could be dump then Islam will be very peaceful and innocent. This essay of mine has been dedicated to refute their (neo-islamists) dishonest claim about the source of Islamic terrorism.
Originally posted by Apollumi
reply to post by beezzer
We were formed (the US) as a republic, for a reason. Obviously democracy allows idiots to rule because the majority of people simply do not think. Now, go stare in a mirror please...
To people that are casual and don't know squat yet rant, I spent time in Egypt. Me, the person posting this message spent time there. Something that took me by surprise was the people I had met. They were not beheading their neighbors and passing casual judgment. They were the "kindest" people I have ever met in my life. Gentle, giving, loving to one another. I also met some of their military and carried on a few conversations with them.
Okay, dun that. Hee-yuk!
Not sure of your point. Does the president define the tenor of a country? Nope. If that were the case, we'd have been kicked out of every country we have ever been in. I think America is defined by it's people. What most in the media and in power try to ignore.
The majority of Arab dictators have been enemies of the West. The US never supported Al Assad of Syria, either father or son, nor Mohmar Gadhafi of Lybia, and yet they are brutal dictators. The West needs to understand that there is something intrinsic in Islamic culture that creates animosity with the West and it has nothing to do with what the West does or does not do. Every Muslim leader who aspires to gain popularity will be guaranteed it if he gives a speech calling America the “Great Satan.” Ahmadinejad’s popularity skyrocketed in Egypt after insulting the American president on American soil in his speech in New York. It is a litmus test in the Arab world that a truly loyal Muslim leader must automatically be an enemy of the West.
This is not a coincidence. Sharia (Islamic) law obliges the Muslim head of state to do violent jihad against non-Muslim countries and never truly befriend them or treat them as equals. Muslim leaders often hide their friendship with the West, and it is time for us and for the Arab world to openly ask: why? Why is it that befriending Western nations will brand them as “puppets of the US,” the one description no Arab leader can survive? To avoid the devastating title of “US puppet” Muslim leaders go to great lengths to appear harsh and critical of the West when, in fact, they really want co-existence. They end up having the well-known two faces of the typical Muslim leader: a friendly one to the West in private, and a critical one in public. That game must be exposed for what it is and it must end.